Effects of society and culture on parents’ ratings of children’s mental health problems in 45 societies
- 84 Downloads
To improve international needs assessment for child mental health services, it is necessary to employ standardized assessment methods that can be easily administered and scored, can be interpreted by practitioners and researchers with various kinds of training, and that perform similarly across many societies. To this end, we tested the effects of both society and culture on parents’ ratings of children’s problems. We used hierarchical linear modeling as well as analyses of variance to analyze parents’ Child Behavior Checklist ratings of 72,493 6- to 16-year-olds from 45 societies. The 45 societies were nested within 10 culture clusters based on the Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) taxonomy. Societal differences accounted for 3.8–10.7% of variance in various kinds of problems, while differences between culture clusters (e.g., Anglo vs. Confucian) accounted for 0.1–10.0%. By contrast, differences associated with parents’ ratings of individual children accounted for 85.5–93.3% of variance. Averaged across 17 problem scales, society plus culture cluster accounted for about 10% of the variance in parents’ ratings of children’s problems, whereas individual differences and other possible variables accounted for about 90%. These findings indicate that parents’ standardized ratings can be used to assess effects associated with individual differences in child and adolescent psychopathology, over and above differences associated with societies and culture clusters.
KeywordsInternational epidemiology Individual differences in child psychopathology Cross-cultural CBCL
Dr. Althoff receives grant or research support from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH082116), the National Institute of Health Center of Biomedical Research Excellence award (P20GM103644), and the Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation. This research was also supported by the non-profit University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.
Compliance with ethical standards
No animals were used in this research. All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
The first, third, and fourth authors receive salary and/or other compensation from the non-profit University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, which publishes the instrument used in this research. The second author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
- 1.House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M et al (2004) Culture leadership and organizations: the GLOBE Study of 62 societies. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 3.Rescorla L, Ivanova MY, Achenbach TM et al (2012) International epidemiology of child and adolescent psychopathology II: integration and applications of dimensional findings from 44 societies. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 51:1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2012.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2001) Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. University of Vermont Research Center for Children Youth and Families, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
- 8.Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences. Sage Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
- 9.Triandis HC (1995) Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
- 12.Achenbach TM (2014) DSM-oriented guide for the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA). University of Vermont Research Center for Children Youth and Families, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
- 13.Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS, Cheong YF et al (2011) HLM 7: linear and nonlinear modeling. Scientific Software International Inc, LincolnwoodGoogle Scholar
- 14.Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 26:211–252Google Scholar
- 15.Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 16.World Bank (2015) Purchasing power parities and the real size of world economies. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- 17.Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2007) Multicultural understanding of child and adolescent psychopathology: implications for mental health assessment. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 19.Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2007) Multicultural supplement to the manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. University of Vermont Research Center for Children Youth and Families, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar