The impact of detention on the social–emotional wellbeing of children seeking asylum: a comparison with community-based children
- 1.1k Downloads
Accumulating literature demonstrates that immigration detention is harmful to children. However, there is a scarcity of scientifically rigorous and reliable data about the health of children held in detention facilities. The aim of the study was to compare a community-based population of recently arrived refugee children flown into Australia, not detained, resettled in a non-urban area, with a population of children who arrived by boat seeking asylum, detained since arrival. The parent-version of the strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) of children aged 4–15 years was compared in children living in the community with those held in detention. We compared 86 children who had a parent-completed SDQ performed, 38 (44%) in the community group and 48 (56%) in the detention group. The community sample had been living in Australia for 325 days, with no time in detention. The detention sample had been living in detention for a mean of 221 days. The mean age was similar for the community and detention sample at 8.4 years (P = 0.18). In the total sample, children in the detention group had significantly higher SDQ total difficulties scores than children in the community group (P < 0.0001). There was no difference between age groups (P = 0.82). The children in the detention group had, on average, an SDQ total difficulties score that was 12 points higher than children in the community group. Four of the five SDQ subscale scores indicated greater disturbance amongst children in detention (< 0.0001) compared to children living in the community. The detention group had significantly higher scores (P < 0.001) for all except Pro-social scores as compared to Australian norms for the 4–6 and 7–15 years age group. This study presents a rare opportunity to compare the wellbeing of displaced children who were detained following arrival in Australia with those settled in the Australian community since arrival. The community children’s scores approximated data from the general Australian childhood population. Children held in detention had significantly more social, emotional and behavioural difficulties than children living in the community, and at levels resembling a clinical cohort. Despite the small sample size, data restrictions and other limitations of the data, statistical significance in differences between the community and detention children is marked and arguably demonstrates the negative impact of post-arrival detention in children who are presumed to have similar levels of pre-arrival adversity. If the objective is to optimise the health and wellbeing of children seeking asylum, removal of post-arrival detention is one of the most powerful interventions available to host countries.
KeywordsRefugee Asylum seeker Children Detention Social–emotional wellbeing Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ)
The authors acknowledge participating families and children involved in the community study, Refugee Health Nurses Jenny Lane, Colleen Allen and Lisa Atkins, and Statistician Jenny Peat. The analysis of the detention sample is possible because the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) collected the primary data from families seeking asylum and detained on Christmas Island. This was subsequently released under Freedom of Information legislation (FOI). Any errors or omissions are the sole responsibility of the authors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article and have no conflict of interest.
The community study was funded by Financial Markets Foundation for Children (AUD$158 000 July 2009–June 2011). The funders had no involvement in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.
The research involving the community sample in this study and the comparison with the detention sample was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee Northern Hospitals Network, South Eastern Sydney (SES) Illawarra Area Health Service/SES Local Health District (HREC Ref No 09/163). The research involving the detention sample in this study was assessed by the South Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/15/LPOOL/556), which was satisfied with provisions to protect the rights of participants. All participants gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.
- 1.UNHRC (2017) United Nation Refugee Agency. Figures at a glance http://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html. Accessed 17 May 2017
- 5.Warfa N, Curtis S, Watters C, Carswell K, Ingleby D, Bhui K (2012) Migration experiences, employment status and psychological distress among Somali immigrants: a mixed-method international study. BMC Public Health 12:749. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-749 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Royal Australasian College of Physicians (2017) https://www.racp.edu.au/advocacy/policy-and-advocacy-priorities/refugee-and-asylum-seeker-health. Accessed 17 May 2017
- 20.Paxton G, Tosif S, Graham H, Smith A, Reveley C, Standish J, McCloskey K, Ferguson G, Isaacs D, Gunasekera H, Marais B, Britton P, Khatami A, Zwi K, Raman S, Elliot E, Levitt D, Francis J, Bauert P, Morris P, Whybourne A, Cherian S, Mutch R, Forbes D, Rutherford D, Packer S (2015) Perspective: the forgotten children: national inquiry into children in immigration detention (2014). J Paediatr Child Health 51(4):365–368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Graf M, Wermuth P, Hafeli D, Weisert A, Reagu S, Pfluger M, Taylor P, Dittmann V, Jones R (2013) Prevalence of mental disorders among detained asylum seekers in deportation arrest in Switzerland and validation of the Brief Jail Mental Health Screen BJMHS. Int J Law Psychiatry 36(3–4):201–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Steel Z, Silove D (2000) The mental health implications of detaining asylum seekers. MJA 175(11–12):596–599Google Scholar
- 38.Australian Human Rights Commission (2015) The forgotten children: national inquiry into children in immigration detention 2014. ISBN 978-1-921449-56-7Google Scholar
- 41.Achenbach TM, Becker A, Döpfner M, Heiervang E, Roessner V, Steinhausen HC, Rothenberger A (2008) Multicultural assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology with ASEBA and SDQ instruments: research findings, applications, and future directions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 49(3):251–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43.Youthinmind (2017) Strengths and difficulties questionnaire: normative SDQ data from Australia. http://www.sdqinfo.com/norms/AusNorm.html. Accessed 17 May 2017
- 45.Sawyer MG, Arney FM, Baghurst PA, Clark JJ, Graetz BW, Kosky RJ, Nurcombe B, Patton GC, Prior MR, Raphael B, Rey JM, Whaites LC, Zubrick SR (2001) The mental health of young people in Australia: key findings from the child and adolescent component of the national survey of mental health and well-being. Aust New Z J Psychiatry 35(6):806–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Australian Human Rights Commission (2014) Handout for hearing: National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention 2014. https://www.humanrights.gov.au/our-work/asylum-seekers-and-refugees/national-inquiry-children-immigration-detention-2014/handout. Accessed 12 May 2017
- 58.Murray L, Halligan SL, Cooper PJ (2010) Effects of postnatal depression on mother–infant interactions, and child development. In: Wachs T, Bremner G (eds) Handbook of infant development. Wiley-Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
- 62.Mathai J, Jespersen S, Bourne A, Donegan T, Akinbiyi A, Gray K (2008) Use of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in identifying emotional and behavioural problems in children of parents with a mental illness in Australia. Aust E J Adv Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.5172/jamh.7.3.200 Google Scholar
- 66.Zwi K, Kalowski J, Parmeter J, Woodland L (2017) The impact of health perceptions and beliefs on access to care for migrants and refugees. J Cult Divers 24(3):63–72Google Scholar
- 70.Booth A (2016) Health workers exempt from immigration detention secrecy provisions, SBS News. http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2016/10/20/government-lifts-gag-doctors-over-speaking-out-asylum-seeker-treatment. Accessed 12 May 2017