Advertisement

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

, Volume 26, Issue 11, pp 1377–1386 | Cite as

Psychopathology and friendship in children and adolescents: disentangling the role of co-occurring symptom domains with serial mediation models

  • Arthur Gus ManfroEmail author
  • Pedro M. Pan
  • Ary Gadelha
  • Marcelo Fleck
  • Maria C. do Rosário
  • Hugo Cogo-Moreira
  • Rodrigo Affonseca-Bressan
  • Jair Mari
  • Euripedes C. Miguel
  • Luis A. Rohde
  • Giovanni A. Salum
Original Contribution

Abstract

The consolidation of social friendship groups is a vital part of human development. The objective of this study is to understand the direct and indirect influences of three major symptomatic domains—emotional, hyperkinetic, and conduct—on friendship. Specifically, we aim to study if the associations of one domain with friendship may be mediated by co-occurring symptoms from another domain. A total of 2512 subjects aged 6–14 years participated in this study. Friendship was evaluated by the Development and Well-Being Assessment’s friendship section. We evaluated two main constructs as outcomes: (1) social isolation and (2) friendship latent construct. Emotional, hyperkinetic, and conduct symptomatic domains were evaluated with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). All SDQ domains were positively associated with social isolation and negatively associated with friendship latent construct in univariate analysis. However, serial mediation models showed that the association between conduct domains with social isolation was mediated by emotion and hyperkinetic domains. Moreover, the associations between emotional and hyperkinetic domains with friendship latent construct in non-isolated children were mediated by the conduct domain. Emotion and hyperkinetic domains were directly and indirectly associated with social isolation, whereas conduct was directly and indirectly associated with overall friendship in non-isolated children. Results suggest that interventions aimed to improve social life in childhood and adolescence may have stronger effects if directed towards the treatment of emotion and hyperkinetic symptoms in socially isolated children and directed towards the treatment of conduct symptoms in children with fragile social connections.

Keywords

Friendship Psychopathology Mediation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Arthur Manfro, Giovanni Salum, Jair Mari, Rodrigo Bressan, Hugo Cogo, and Euripedes Constantino Miguel declare no potential conflicts of interest. Ary Gadelha and Pedro Pan have received continuous medical education support from Astra Zeneca, Eli-Lilly, and Janssen-Cilag. Luis Augusto Rohde has been a member of the speakers’ bureau/advisory board and/or acted as a consultant for Eli-Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis and Shire in the last 3 years. He receives authorship royalties from Oxford Press and ArtMed. He has also received travel awards from Shire for his participation in the 2014 APA and 2015 WFADHD meetings. The ADHD and Juvenile Bipolar Disorder Outpatient Programs chaired by him received unrestricted educational and research support from the following pharmaceutical companies in the last 3 years: Eli-Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, and Shire.

References

  1. 1.
    Pinker S, Foster M (2014) How the mind works. MP3 Una edition. Brilliance AudioGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mundt MP, Zakletskaia LI (2014) That’s what friends are for: adolescent peer social status, health-related quality of life and healthcare costs. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 12(2):191–201. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0084-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    PLoS Medicine Editors (2010) Social relationships are key to health, and to health policy. PLoS Med 7(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000334
  4. 4.
    Wrzus C, Hänel M, Wagner J, Neyer FJ (2013) Social network changes and life events across the life span: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 139(1):53–80. doi: 10.1037/a0028601 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cardoos SL, Hinshaw SP (2011) Friendship as protection from peer victimization for girls with and without ADHD. J Abnorm Child Psychol 39(7):1035–1045. doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9517-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Driscoll C, Heary C, Hennessy E, McKeague L (2015) Adolescents’ beliefs about the fairness of exclusion of peers with mental health problems. J Adolesc 42:59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.03.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Silke C, Swords L, Heary C (2016) The development of an empirical model of mental health stigma in adolescents. Psychiatry Res. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.05.033 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gardner DM, Gerdes AC (2015) A review of peer relationships and friendships in youth with ADHD. J Atten Disord 19(10):844–855. doi: 10.1177/1087054713501552 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Normand S, Schneider BH, Lee MD, Maisonneuve M-F, Chupetlovska-Anastasova A, Kuehn SM, Robaey P (2013) Continuities and changes in the friendships of children with and without ADHD: a longitudinal, observational study. J Abnorm Child Psychol 41(7):1161–1175. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9753-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bunford N, Evans SW, Becker SP, Langberg JM (2015) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and social skills in youth: a moderated mediation model of emotion dysregulation and depression. J Abnorm Child Psychol 43(2):283–296. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9909-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marton I, Wiener J, Rogers M, Moore C (2015) Friendship characteristics of children with ADHD. J Atten Disord 19(10):872–881. doi: 10.1177/1087054712458971 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bunford N, Brandt N, Golden K, Dykstra J, Owens JS, Suhr JA (2015) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms mediate the association between neuropsychological and social impairment among children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 43:133–147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Borsboom D, Cramer AOJ, Schmittmann VD, Epskamp S, Waldorp LJ (2011) The small world of psychopathology. PLoS One 6(11):e27407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027407 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Caspi A, Houts RM, Belsky DW, Goldman-Mellor SJ, Harrington H, Israel S, Meier MH et al (2014) The P factor: one general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clin Psychol Sci J Assoc Psychol Sci 2(2):119–137. doi: 10.1177/2167702613497473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Muthén BO, Muhtén LK, Asparouhov T (2016) Regression and mediation analysis using Mplus. Muhtén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Salum GA, Gadelha A, Pan PM, Moriyama TS, Graeff-Martins AS, Tamanaha AC, Alvarenga P et al (2015) High risk cohort study for psychiatric disorders in childhood: rationale, design, methods and preliminary results. Int J Method Psychiatric Res 24(1):58–73. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fleitlich-Bilyk B, Goodman R (2004) Prevalence of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders in Southeast Brazil. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 43(6):727–734. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000120021.14101.ca CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goodman A, Goodman R (2012) Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire scores and mental health in looked after children. Br J Psychiatry J Ment Sci 200(5):426–427. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.104380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H (2000) Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry J Ment Sci 177:534–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mieloo CL, Bevaart F, Donker MCH, van Oort FVA, Raat H, Jansen W (2014) Validation of the SDQ in a multi-ethnic population of young children. Eur J Pub Health 24(1):26–32. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rothenberger A, Becker A, Erhart M, Wille N, Ravens-Sieberer U, BELLA study group (2008) Psychometric properties of the parent strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: results of the BELLA study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 17(Suppl 1):99–105. doi: 10.1007/s00787-008-1011-2
  22. 22.
    Muris P, Meesters C, van den Berg F (2003) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)–further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of dutch children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 12(1):1–8. doi: 10.1007/s00787-003-0298-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Malmberg M, Rydell A-M, Smedje H (2003) Validity of the Swedish Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Swe). Nord J Psychiatry 57(5):357–363. doi: 10.1080/08039480310002697 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vostanis P (2006) Strengths and difficulties questionnaire: research and clinical applications. Curr Opin Psychiatry 19(4):367–372. doi: 10.1097/01.yco.0000228755.72366.05 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA, Ivanova MY (2012) International epidemiology of child and adolescent psychopathology I: diagnoses, dimensions, and conceptual issues. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 51(12):1261–1272. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.09.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Silva TBF, Osório FL, Loureiro SR (2015) SDQ: discriminative validity and diagnostic potential. Front Psychol 6:811. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00811 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hu LT, Bentler PM, Kano Y (1992) Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychol Bull 112(2):351–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cook KF, Kallen MA, Amtmann D (2009) Having a fit: impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT’s unidimensionality assumption. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Aspect Treatment Care Rehabil 18(4):447–460. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9464-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rosseel Y (2012). lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 48(2):1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
  31. 31.
    Mackinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J (2004) Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivar Behav Res 39(1):99. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mooney CZ, Duval RD, Duvall R (1993) A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. SAGE, BootstrappingGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nolan SA, Flynn C, Garber J (2003) Prospective relations between rejection and depression in young adolescents. J Pers Soc Psychol 85(4):745–755. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.745 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hoza B (2007) Peer functioning in children with ADHD. J Pediatr Psychol 32(6):655–663. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Barkley RA (1997) Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychol Bull 121(1):65–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Blachman DR, Hinshaw SP (2002) Patterns of friendship among girls with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol 30(6):625–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Harvey EA, Breaux RP, Lugo-Candelas CI (2016) Early development of comorbidity between symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 125(2):154–167. doi: 10.1037/abn0000090 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Whalen CK, Jamner LD, Henker B, Delfino RJ, Lozano JM (2002) The ADHD spectrum and everyday life: experience sampling of adolescent moods, activities, smoking, and drinking. Child Dev 73(1):209–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur Gus Manfro
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Pedro M. Pan
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ary Gadelha
    • 2
    • 3
  • Marcelo Fleck
    • 4
  • Maria C. do Rosário
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hugo Cogo-Moreira
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rodrigo Affonseca-Bressan
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jair Mari
    • 2
    • 3
  • Euripedes C. Miguel
    • 2
    • 5
  • Luis A. Rohde
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
  • Giovanni A. Salum
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Section on Negative Affect and Social Processes, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto AlegreUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.National Institute of Developmental Psychiatry for Children and Adolescents (INCT-CNPq)São PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryUniversidade Federal de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  4. 4.Department of PsychiatryUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  5. 5.Department and Institute of PsychiatryUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations