European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 319–326 | Cite as

Associations between overweight, peer problems, and mental health in 12–13-year-old Norwegian children

  • Ingebjørg Hestetun
  • Martin Veel Svendsen
  • Inger Margaret Oellingrath
Original Contribution

Abstract

Overweight and mental health problems represent two major challenges related to child and adolescent health. More knowledge of a possible relationship between the two problems and the influence of peer problems on the mental health of overweight children is needed. It has previously been hypothesized that peer problems may be an underlying factor in the association between overweight and mental health problems. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the associations between overweight, peer problems, and indications of mental health problems in a sample of 12–13-year-old Norwegian schoolchildren. Children aged 12–13 years were recruited from the seventh grade of primary schools in Telemark County, Norway. Parents gave information about mental health and peer problems by completing the extended version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Height and weight were objectively measured. Complete data were obtained for 744 children. Fisher’s exact probability test and multiple logistic regressions were used. Most children had normal good mental health. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that overweight children were more likely to have indications of psychiatric disorders (adjusted OR: 1.8, CI: 1.0–3.2) and peer problems (adjusted OR: 2.6, CI: 1.6–4.2) than normal-weight children, when adjusted for relevant background variables. When adjusted for peer problems, the association between overweight and indications of any psychiatric disorder was no longer significant. The results support the hypothesis that peer problems may be an important underlying factor for mental health problems in overweight children.

Keywords

Overweight Peer problems Mental health Psychiatric disorder Children Adolescents 

Introduction

Overweight and mental health problems in children and adolescents are two major health challenges in Norway, as well as in other western countries [1]. Being overweight in childhood may have adverse consequences on physical morbidity in adulthood and result in premature mortality. Furthermore, common mental disorders seen in adulthood often emerge first in childhood and adolescence. Approximately half of all lifetime mental disorders start by the mid-teens [2]. This highlights the importance of early prevention and intervention.

A substantial increase in overweight has been observed in Norwegian school children over the last 30 years [3, 4]. Furthermore, it is estimated that 15–20 % of all Norwegian children and adolescents have reduced functioning due to symptoms of mental disorders, and approximately half of them will have such severe symptoms that they will meet the requirements for a psychiatric diagnosis [5]. One study found that 7 % of 8–10-year-old Norwegian children met the criteria of any DSM-IV psychiatric disorder [6]. The incidence increases with age, and is higher among adolescents [5].

In adult population studies, an association between psychopathology and obesity is often found [7]. However, results from population-based studies of children and adolescents are conflicting [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. Overweight and obese children have been shown to be at higher risk of poor psychological health in general [18, 20] internalizing and externalizing mental health problems [11], behavior problems [8] and of meeting the criteria for an ADHD diagnosis [22]. Other studies, however, do not confirm such associations between overweight and mental health problems, or find the associations dependent of sociodemographic variables, lifestyle factors, or body-weight perceptions [9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21].

The association between overweight and mental health problems is more often found in clinical groups of children than in population studies [23, 24, 25]. Elevated levels of psychopathology have also been reported among treatment-seeking obese Norwegian children and adolescents, when compared with a matched community sample [26]. In a recently published review, Russell-Mayhew et al. [27] discuss and summarize the conflicting evidence in this field. They conclude that little is known about the relationship between mental health and childhood obesity, although there appears to be some consensus that obesity is a potential risk factor for psychological and emotional well-being in children and adolescents.

Weight-based stigmatization and negative attitudes to overweight children and adolescents are well documented [28]. In a recently published comprehensive review, Puhl and King [29] further concluded that weight-based victimization may have serious consequences for the emotional, social, academic, and physical well-being of adolescents. Difficulties in peer relations are often observed among overweight children and adolescents. Overweight adolescents are more likely to be socially isolated [13, 30, 31], less accepted by peers [31], and experience victimization by peers more often than normal-weight adolescents [32, 33, 34]. They also report more difficulties in making friends [35]. Peer problems, as a possible result of the social stigma attached to overweight, have been hypothesized to be an important underlying factor for mental health problems in overweight children and adolescents [27, 32]. More studies would be useful to explore the role of peer problems as a possible mediating variable [36] in the association between overweight and mental health problems.

To summarize, current results from studies exploring the possible relationship between overweight and poor mental health in the general population of children and adolescents are inconsistent. Weight-based stigmatization and other peer problems are often observed among overweight young people. It has previously been hypothesized that peer problem is an underlying factor in the association between overweight and mental health problems. The purpose of the present study was to:
  1. 1.

    Investigate the associations between overweight problems, peer problems, and indications of mental health problems in a sample of 12–13-year-old Norwegian school children.

     
  2. 2.

    Test the hypothesis that an association between overweight and mental health problems is mediated by peer problems.

     

Methods

Study design and sample

The present data were obtained from a study of primary school pupils in Telemark County, Norway. Data collection took place in the spring of 2010, when the children were in primary school grade 7 (age 12–13). The detailed data collection methods have been described previously [37, 38, 39]. All 104 primary schools in Telemark County were invited to participate in the study. In total, written parental consent for inclusion in the study was received for 1,095 out of 1,503 invited children (73 %), representing about half of the county’s seventh grade pupils. Data on mental health and peer problems were obtained for 871 pupils. Complete data, including weight and height measurements, were obtained for 744 children.

The research was conducted in accordance with the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Regional Committee for Ethics in Medical Research and the Norwegian Data Inspectorate. Informed written consent was obtained from the parents of all participating children.

Measures

Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire

The children’s mental health problems, peer relation problems, and social competence were measured using the parental version of the extended Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) [37, 40]. The SDQ is a 25 item screening questionnaire for assessing mental health problems in children and adolescents aged 4–16 years. Four subscales, each with five items, cover emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity, and peer problems. The emotional symptoms scale covers problems such as having many worries or fears, and complaints of headaches. The conduct problem scale covers problems such as having a hot temper, fighting, lying or cheating. The hyperactivity scale covers symptoms such as being overactive, impulsive and easily distracted. Peer problems include whether the child tends to play alone, has friends, is generally liked by other children, gets on better with adults than other children, and is picked on or bullied by other children. A fifth subscale, also with five items, covers prosocial behavior, and asks whether the child is considerate of other people’s feelings, helpful and kind to younger children. The latter is a measure of the child’s ability to act prosocially, independent of the difficulties measured by the other subscales.

The extended SDQ includes an impact supplement, a scale that rates the extent to which the respondent thinks that the child’s problems have an impact on daily functioning. In our study, parents gave information on the SDQ, including the impact scale. Information from SDQ subscales and the SDQ impact supplement was combined according to a scoring algorithm given by Goodman et al. [41]. The algorithm makes separate predictions for indications of conduct-oppositional disorders, hyperactivity–inattention disorders and anxiety-depressive disorders, denominated in the following as “conduct disorders,” “hyperactivity,” and “emotional disorders,” respectively. These three subscales are combined to generate an overall prediction of indications of “any psychiatric disorder.” In the present study, we use “mental health problems” as an overall term to denominate the indications of all psychiatric disorders explained by the algorithm. The peer problems scale and prosocial behavior scale were not included in the scale predicting indications of any psychiatric disorder.

We combined the “possible” and “likely” categories into “possible/likely” and all comparisons were made between the “unlikely” group and the “possible/likely” group. The algorithm requires at least two informants (for example, parent and teacher) to meet the criteria of “likely” on the hyperactivity–inattention scale. As only information from parents (reporting together) was available, an adjustment was made to allow for the category “possible/likely” with one informant when the information gave a score within the defined “possible/likely” category range.

BMI categories

The weight and height of the children were measured in private by public health nurses at each school. The health nurses, using their professional judgment, decided how much of the measurement information was given to the child. The children were weighed wearing light clothing (i.e., trousers, T-shirt, socks), using calibrated, electronic scales measuring in 100 g increments. The BMI (kg/m2) of each child was calculated on the basis of the measurements. Child BMI categories were calculated using international obesity task force (IOTF) cutoff points (underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese), based on growth curves and BMIs of 17, 25 and 30 kg/m2 at age 18 [42, 43]. Because of small numbers, we included underweight children in the normal-weight group and obese children in the overweight group.

Other variables

In addition to providing information about the mental health of their child, the parents answered questions about their own educational level and family income.

Parental educational levels were divided into three categories: “primary and lower secondary education” (10 years or less), “upper secondary education” (3–4 years of secondary education), and “university or university college.”

Family income was also divided into three categories: “both parents <Norwegian kroner (NOK) 300,000,” “one parent ≥NOK 300,000,” and “both parents ≥NOK 300,000.” (NOK 300,000 = EUR 40,849 as on 12 December 2012).

Statistical analysis

The bivariate associations between BMI categories, mental health problems, peer problems and social behavior problems were tested using Fisher’s exact test.

We used multiple logistic regression analysis to examine the association between BMI categories (independent variable), peer problems, and indications of any psychiatric disorder (dependent variables). Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for risk of having indications of any psychiatric disorder and peer problems. The potential confounding background variables available for the multiple regression models were: maternal education, paternal education, family income, and child gender. We applied forward conditional selection and included variables significantly associated with the risk of having any psychiatric disorder or peer problems in the respective models (1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, and 3). Model 3 was also adjusted for peer problems.

For all tests, a significance level of p < 0.05 was applied. The questionnaires were scanned by Eyes and Hands (Readsoft Forms, Helsingborg, Sweden). Statistical analyses were performed using programs available in SPSS for Windows (version 19.0).

Results

The results are based on the 744 children for whom complete parental reported data on mental health information and objectively measured height and weight were obtained. Of the participants, 52 % were girls and 48 % were boys. Some 49 % of mothers and 36 % of fathers were registered in the highest education category “university or university college,” 34 % of mothers and 42 % of fathers fell into the category “upper secondary education,” and 12 % of mothers and 12 % of fathers fell into the lowest education category, “primary/lower secondary education.” In total, 86 % of the parents were registered in the two highest categories of family income. Seventeen percent of the children were categorized as overweight (14 % overweight, 3 % obese).

According to the parent-completed SDQ reports, most children had good mental health (Table 1). In total, 9 % of the children had symptoms of sufficient extent and severity to indicate that a psychiatric disorder was possible or likely. Most prevalent were symptoms of hyperactivity and conduct disorders, while symptoms of emotional disorders were less frequent. Furthermore, 13 % of the children had peer problems, while 4 % had prosocial behavior problems (Table 1).
Table 1

Mental health problems, peer problems, and prosocial behavior problems of 12–13-year-old children according to the extended SDQ (n = 744)

Mental health problems, peer problems, and prosocial behavior problems

n

%

Indications of any psychiatric disordera

 Unlikely

676

91

 Possible/likely

68

9

Indications of emotional disordersa

 Unlikely

730

98

 Possible/likely

14

2

Indications of conduct disordersa

 Unlikely

716

96

 Possible/likely

28

4

Indications of hyperactivity disordersa

 Unlikely

705

95

 Possible/likely

39

5

Peer problems

 Unlikely

649

87

 Possible/likely

95

13

Prosocial behavior problems

 Unlikely

717

96

 Possible/likely

27

4

aAdjusted for impact on functioning

Significant bivariate associations were observed between overweight and peer problems, and between overweight and indications of “any psychiatric disorder” (Table 2). However, no significant associations between overweight and the underlying subscales (emotional disorders, conduct disorders, or hyperactivity) were observed. No significant association was observed between overweight and prosocial behavior problems (Table 2). A significant association between peer problems and indications of “any psychiatric disorder” with OR = 4.6 (2.7, 8.1) was observed.
Table 2

Prevalence of mental health problems, peer problems, and prosocial behavior problems by BMI categories (n = 744)

BMI categories

n (%)

n (%) of Parents reporting possible or likely disorders/problems

Indications of any psychiatric disorder

Indications of emotional disorders

Indications of conduct disorders

Indications of hyperactivity disorders

Peer problems

Prosocial behavior problems

Normal weight

620 (83)

50 (8)

12 (2)

21 (3)

29 (5)

65 (10)

23 (4)

Overweight

124 (17)

18 (15)

2 (2)

7 (6)

10 (8)

30 (24)

4 (3)

p valuea

 

0.039

1.0

0.296

0.125

<0.001

1.0

SDQ scale adjusted for impact on functioning

aFisher’s exact test (two-sided), a significance level of p < 0.05 was used

Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that overweight children were more likely to have indications of “any psychiatric disorder” and peer problems than normal-weight children (Table 3, models 1a and 1b). The associations were observed independently of available background variables (Table 3, models 2a and 2b). When adjusting for peer problems, the association between overweight and indications of “any psychiatric disorder” was no longer significant (Table 3, model 3), supporting the hypothesis that peer problems mediate an association between overweight and mental health problems. Multiple regression analysis using continuous SDQ subscales without impact questions (where appropriate) did not give substantially different results.
Table 3

Associations between BMI categories and peer problems, and between BMI categories and indications of any psychiatric disorder (n = 744)

Variables

Total (n = 744)

Peer problems

Indications of any psychiatric disorder

BMI categories

Model 1a OR crude (95 % CI)

Model 2a OR adjusteda (95 % CI)

Model 1b OR crude (95 % CI)

Model 2b OR adjustedb (95 % CI)

Model 3 OR adjustedc (95 % CI)

Normal weight

620

1

1

1

1

1

Overweight

124

2.7 (1.7–4.4)

2.6 (1.6–4.2)

1.9 (1.1–3.4)

1.8 (1.0–3.2)d

1.4 (0.8–2.6)

Odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). A significance level of p < 0.05 was applied for associated background variables

Missing data are not included in analyses

aAdjusted for significantly associated background variables (paternal education)

bAdjusted for significantly associated background variables (maternal education)

cAdjusted for significantly associated background variables (maternal education) and peer problems

dValues rounded from 1.006 to 3.244, p = 0.048

Discussion

In the present study, we observed that overweight children were more likely to have peer problems and mental health problems than normal-weight children. We found a significant association between overweight and mental health problems dependent on the presence of peer problems, supporting our hypothesis that the relation between overweight and mental health might be explained by peer problems as a mediating variable. All associations were observed independently of available background variables.

Other studies have used different assessments of mental health problems and peer relations, making direct comparison with our results difficult. However, some similarities can be observed. Our results are in line with several previous studies from Europe, Canada and the US in which overweight children and adolescents have been found to experience problematic peer relations or been subject to peer victimization. Overweight children have been found more likely to be socially isolated [30], and described as more socially withdrawn and found less attractive than others by their peers [31]. In addition, parents of overweight adolescents more often reported that their youngster was withdrawn or did not get along with others than did other parents [13]. Several studies addressing social relations have found overweight children and adolescents more often subject to peer victimization than children of normal weight [13, 32, 33, 34]. Overweight has been reported by peers to be a primary reason for youngsters being victimized and teased in a mean way [32]. One study reported that overweight youngsters were more likely to be cruel or mean to others [13]. Obese and overweight adolescents more often reported difficulties making new friends than normal-weight children, and they also more often believed that others made negative comments about them [35].

Results from previous population studies addressing the relationship between overweight/obesity and mental health problems of children and adolescents are inconsistent. However, obesity is often perceived to be a potential risk factor for the psychological and emotional well-being of children and adolescents [27]. The association we found between overweight and indications of psychiatric disorders is consistent with this notion, and supports previous studies in which an association between overweight and poor mental health has been reported. In contrast to other studies [8, 11, 22], we were not able to identify any significant associations between overweight and indications of more specific psychiatric disorders. The absence of significant associations between overweight and indications of emotional disorders, conduct disorders, and hyperactivity disorders may be due to the relatively low number of adolescents with such problems, which increases the probability of not detecting true associations that are present (type II errors). Further, mental health problems are known to increase during adolescence [2, 5]. Our participants are relatively young. The associations often found in the adult population [7] may, therefore, appear at a later age.

Several studies have questioned a casual or predictive relationship between overweight and mental health problems in the general adolescent population [27]. Problematic peer relations are often found to be associated with psychological problems among children and adolescents [44] and a general association between peer problems and indications of any psychiatric disorder was also observed in our study. Peer problems have been hypothesized to be an important underlying factor for mental health problems in overweight children [27, 32]. The overweight adolescent will often have own concerns about weight and shape, and experience weight-based teasing and stigmatization by others. This substantiate the notion that peer problems may be a particularly important factor in the association between childhood overweight and mental health problems [27]. Our findings support this, as the association between overweight and mental health problems was no longer found to be significant when peer problems were taken into consideration. This, along with the strong association found between peer problems and indications of any psychiatric disorder, supports the hypothesis that peer problems are a mediator in the association between overweight and mental health problems.

Strengths and limitations

Strengths of the present study are the relatively large number of informants, the acceptable response rate, and the use of objectively measured weight and height to calculate BMI. Another strength is the availability of information about sociodemographic variables considered relevant for BMI status and mental health variability. The use of the extended SDQ for measuring indications of psychiatric disorders should also be considered strength of this study. The inclusion of the impact scale increases the validity of the SDQ as a measure of mental health problems compared with instruments that only ask about symptoms [45]. The SDQ has been widely used in Norwegian community studies [37, 46].

The study also has limitations that should be recognized. One limitation is the lack of cross-informant comparisons, which is recommended when using the SDQ [47]. The algorithm used was primarily developed for use with multiple informants—parents, teachers, and adolescents—but has also been used with parents as the only informants [48, 49]. With one informant, parental ratings have previously been found to be a more reliable predictor of clinical status than children’s self-reports [50]. Using British norms may have resulted in some underestimation of problems, as Norwegian studies generally report lower symptom scale means than British studies [46]. These limitations mainly concern potential underestimation of SDQ difficulties scores, which in turn may have caused a weakening of the associations studied.

It is important to recognize that the SDQ peer problems subscale is a general scale that measures different aspects of peer relationships. One question specifically addresses peer victimization, but the scale also includes questions related to social withdrawal and whether the child is generally liked by other children. The broad nature of the scale limits the ability to study specific aspects of peer problems in detail. However, for our purpose, a scale covering several aspects of peer problems was preferable. Further studies are needed to provide detailed knowledge of how different aspects of peer problems may influence the mental health of overweight children.

In our study, obesity and overweight were defined as one category. The study did not include enough obese children to investigate obesity separately. However, we find it likely that the associations observed would be even stronger in obese children. We used age- and sex-adjusted BMI, which is a crude measure of overweight. Only data on height and weight were collected and available for the analysis and for our purpose, we considered BMI to be an acceptable measure of overweight.

One possible limitation of the results is bias due to non responders. We included only participants with complete data on BMI categories and mental health variables in the analyses. Because those with missing data on these variables did not differ substantially from the remaining informants with regard to background variables, we consider this problem to be limited. Data collection was limited to one Norwegian county, and the participating parents had a somewhat higher educational level and total family income than the county’s population in general. The results are therefore not necessarily representative of the national population. Although the analyses were adjusted for several possible confounders, other biological and environmental factors not taken into account here may have attenuated the associations observed between overweight, peer problems, and indications of mental health problems.

The study’s cross-sectional design eliminates the possibility of identifying causal relationships. Furthermore, the associations found may be bidirectional, implying that mental health problems or peer problems may promote comfort eating and weight gain. Adolescents who feel sad and depressed because of weight-based victimization might increase food consumption as a self-soothing behavior [51, 52]. To clarify the direction of the associations observed, longitudinal studies are needed. As we plan to repeat the data collection after 3 years, we hope to present longitudinal data to clarify the direction of the associations observed.

Implications

An understanding of mental health problems among children and adolescents is important in targeting public health activities and clinical practice. Our findings support the hypothesis that peer problems may play an important role for the mental health of overweight children. To reduce mental health problems among overweight children and adolescents, negative attitudes and stereotypes toward overweight children should be addressed. Further longitudinal studies are needed to provide detailed knowledge of how different aspects of peer problems are related to mental health problems among overweight and obese children, and to clarify the direction of the associations observed. The results highlight the importance of reducing stigmatization of this vulnerable group.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Telemark University College, Telemark Hospital, the Research Council of Norway, and the Public Health Programme for Telemark. The authors appreciate the cooperation of the children and their parents, the faculty and staff of the Telemark County primary and lower secondary schools, and the public health nurses who participated in this study.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Samdal O, Leversen I, Torsheim T, Manger MS, Brunborg GS, Wold B (2009) The health behaviour in School-Aged Children: WHO Collaborative Cross-National Study (HBSC). In Norwegian. Bergen: Research Centre for Health Promotion, University of Bergen. http://hdl.handle.net/1956/3734
  2. 2.
    Kessler RC, Amminger GP, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Lee S, Ustun TB (2007) Age of onset of mental disorders: a review of recent literature. Curr Opin Psychiatry 20(4):359–364. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e32816ebc8c CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andersen LF, Lillegaard IT, Overby N, Lytle L, Klepp KI, Johansson L (2005) Overweight and obesity among Norwegian schoolchildren: changes from 1993 to 2000. Scand J Public Health 33(2):99–106. doi:10.1080/140349404100410019172 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Juliusson PB, Eide GE, Roelants M, Waaler PE, Hauspie R, Bjerknes R (2010) Overweight and obesity in Norwegian children: prevalence and socio-demographic risk factors. Acta Paediatr 99(6):900–905. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01730.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Mental disorders in children and adolescents in Norway. http://www.fhi.no/artikler?id=84062. Accessed November 27, 2012
  6. 6.
    Heiervang E, Stormark KM, Lundervold AJ, Heimann M, Goodman R, Posserud MB, Ullebo AK, Plessen KJ, Bjelland I, Lie SA, Gillberg C (2007) Psychiatric disorders in Norwegian 8- to 10-year-olds: an epidemiological survey of prevalence, risk factors, and service use. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 46(4):438–447. doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e31803062bf CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taylor VH, Forhan M, Vigod SN, McIntyre RS, Morrison KM (2013) The impact of obesity on quality of life. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 27(2):139–146. doi:10.1016/j.beem.2013.04.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lumeng JC, Gannon K, Cabral HJ, Frank DA, Zuckerman B (2003) Association between clinically meaningful behavior problems and overweight in children. Pediatrics 112(5):1138–1145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Swallen KC, Reither EN, Haas SA, Meier AM (2005) Overweight, obesity, and health-related quality of life among adolescents: the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Pediatrics 115(2):340–347. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-0678 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Viner RM, Haines MM, Taylor SJ, Head J, Booy R, Stansfeld S (2006) Body mass, weight control behaviours, weight perception and emotional well being in a multiethnic sample of early adolescents. Int J Obes (Lond) 30(10):1514–1521. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gibson LY, Byrne SM, Blair E, Davis EA, Jacoby P, Zubrick SR (2008) Clustering of psychosocial symptoms in overweight children. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 42(2):118–125. doi:10.1080/00048670701787560 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jansen W, van de Looij-Jansen PM, de Wilde EJ, Brug J (2008) Feeling fat rather than being fat may be associated with psychological well-being in young Dutch adolescents. J Adolesc Health 42(2):128–136. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.07.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Be Lue R, Francis LA, Colaco B (2009) Mental health problems and overweight in a nationally representative sample of adolescents: effects of race and ethnicity. Pediatrics 123(2):697–702. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-0687 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drukker M, Wojciechowski F, Feron FJ, Mengelers R, Van Os J (2009) A community study of psychosocial functioning and weight in young children and adolescents. Int J Pediatr Obes 4(2):91–97. doi:10.1080/17477160802395442 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ali MM, Fang H, Rizzo JA (2010) Body weight, self-perception and mental health outcomes among adolescents. J Ment Health Policy Econ 13(2):53–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garthus-Niegel S, Hagtvet KA, Vollrath ME (2010) A prospective study of weight development and behavior problems in toddlers: the Norwegian mother and child cohort study. BMC Public Health 10:626. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-626 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pitrou I, Shojaei T, Wazana A, Gilbert F, Kovess-Masfety V (2010) Child overweight, associated psychopathology, and social functioning: a French school-based survey in 6- to 11-year-old children. Obesity (Silver Spring) 18(4):809–817. doi:10.1038/oby.2009.278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Wijnen LG, Boluijt PR, Hoeven-Mulder HB, Bemelmans WJ, Wendel-Vos GC (2010) Weight status, psychological health, suicidal thoughts, and suicide attempts in Dutch adolescents: results from the 2003 E-MOVO project. Obesity (Silver Spring) 18(5):1059–1061. doi:10.1038/oby.2009.334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wake M, Canterford L, Patton GC, Hesketh K, Hardy P, Williams J, Waters E, Carlin JB (2010) Comorbidities of overweight/obesity experienced in adolescence: longitudinal study. Arch Dis Child 95(3):162–168. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.147439 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haboush A, Phebus T, Tanata Ashby D, Zaikina-Montgomery H, Kindig K (2011) Still unhealthy 2009: building community research to identify risk factors and health outcomes in childhood obesity. J Community Health 36(1):111–120. doi:10.1007/s10900-010-9288-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang L, Tao FB, Wan YH, Xing C, Hao J, Su PY, Xing XY (2011) Self-reported weight status rather than BMI may be closely related to psychopathological symptoms among Mainland Chinese adolescents. J Trop Pediatr 57(4):307–311. doi:10.1093/tropej/fmp097 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Erhart M, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Wille N, Sawitzky-Rose B, Holling H, Ravens-Sieberer U (2010) Examining the relationship between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and overweight in children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 21(1):39–49. doi:10.1007/s00787-011-0230-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zametkin AJ, Zoon CK, Klein HW, Munson S (2004) Psychiatric aspects of child and adolescent obesity: a review of the past 10 years. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 43(2):134–150. doi:10.1097/00004583-200402000-00008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Janicke DM, Harman JS, Kelleher KJ, Zhang J (2008) Psychiatric diagnosis in children and adolescents with obesity-related health conditions. J Dev Behav Pediatr 29(4):276–284. doi:10.1097/DBP.0b013e31817102f8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eschenbeck H, Kohlmann CW, Dudey S, Schurholz T (2009) Physician-diagnosed obesity in German 6- to 14-year-olds. Prevalence and comorbidity of internalising disorders, externalising disorders, and sleep disorders. Obes Facts 2(2):67–73. doi:10.1159/000209987 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Steinsbekk S, Jozefiak T, Odegard R, Wichstrom L (2009) Impaired parent-reported quality of life in treatment-seeking children with obesity is mediated by high levels of psychopathology. Qual Life Res 18(9):1159–1167. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9535-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Russell-Mayhew S, McVey G, Bardick A, Ireland A (2012) Mental health, wellness, and childhood overweight/obesity. J Obes 2012:281801. doi:10.1155/2012/281801 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Puhl RM, Latner JD (2007) Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation’s children. Psychol Bull 133(4):557–580. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.557 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Puhl RM, King KM (2013) Weight discrimination and bullying. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 27(2):117–127. doi:10.1016/j.beem.2012.12.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Strauss RS, Pollack HA (2003) Social marginalization of overweight children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157(8):746–752. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.8.746 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zeller MH, Reiter-Purtill J, Ramey C (2008) Negative peer perceptions of obese children in the classroom environment. Obesity (Silver Spring) 16(4):755–762. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Puhl RM, Luedicke J, Heuer C (2011) Weight-based victimization toward overweight adolescents: observations and reactions of peers. J Sch Health 81(11):696–703. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00646.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brixval CS, Rayce SL, Rasmussen M, Holstein BE, Due P (2012) Overweight, body image and bullying—an epidemiological study of 11- to 15-years olds. Eur J Public Health 22(1):126–130. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckr010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hong JS, Espelage DL (2012) A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: an ecological system analysis. Aggress Violent Behav 17(4):311–322. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fonseca H, Matos MG, Guerra A, Pedro JG (2009) Are overweight and obese adolescents different from their peers? Int J Pediatr Obes 4(3):166–174. doi:10.1080/17477160802464495 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36..
    Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Oellingrath IM, Svendsen MV, Hestetun I (2013) Eating patterns and mental health problems in early adolescence—a cross-sectional study of 12–13-year-old Norwegian schoolchildren. Public Health Nutr Oct 10:1–9. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1017/S1368980013002747
  38. 38.
    Oellingrath IM, Svendsen MV, Brantsaeter AL (2010) Eating patterns and overweight in 9- to 10-year-old children in Telemark County, Norway: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Clin Nutr 64(11):1272–1279. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2010.152 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Oellingrath IM, Svendsen MV, Brantsaeter AL (2011) Tracking of eating patterns and overweight – a follow-up study of Norwegian schoolchildren from middle childhood to early adolescence. Nutr J 10:106. doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-106 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Goodman R (1999) The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 40(5):791–799CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Goodman R, Ford T, Simmons H, Gatward R, Meltzer H (2000) Using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. Br J Psychiatry 177:534–539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH (2000) Psychiatry 177:534-539) Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 320(7244):1240–1243CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cole TJ, Flegal KM, Nicholls D, Jackson AA (2007) Body mass index cut offs to define thinness in children and adolescents: international survey. BMJ 335(7612):194. doi:10.1136/bmj.39238.399444.55 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hay DF, Payne A, Chadwick A (2004) Peer relations in childhood. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 45(1):84–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Goodman R, Renfrew D, Mullick D (2000) Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) scores in child mental health clinics in London and Dhaka. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 9(2):129–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Obel C, Heiervang E, Rodriguez A, Heyerdahl S, Smedje H, Sourander A, Guethmundsson OO, Clench-Aas J, Christensen E, Heian F, Mathiesen KS, Magnusson P, Njarethvik U, Koskelainen M, Ronning JA, Stormark KM, Olsen J (2004) The Strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the Nordic countries. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):II32–II32. doi:10.1007/s00787-004-2006-2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Goodman R (1997) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38(5):581–586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bourdon KH, Goodman R, Rae DS, Simpson G, Koretz DS (2005) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: USA normative data and psychometric properties. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 44(6):557–564. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000159157.57075.c8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ravens-Sieberer U, Wille N, Erhart M, Bettge S, Wittchen HU, Rothenberger A, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Resch F, Holling H, Bullinger M, Barkmann C, Schulte-Markwort M, Dopfner M (2008) Prevalence of mental health problems among children and adolescents in Germany: results of the BELLA study within the national health interview and examination survey. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 17(Suppl 1):22–33. doi:10.1007/s00787-008-1003-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Goodman R (2001) Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40(11):1337–1345. doi:10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gibson EL (2012) The psychobiology of comfort eating: implications for neuropharmacological interventions. Behav Pharmacol 23(5–6):442–460. doi:10.1097/FBP.0b013e328357bd4e CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Puhl RM, Luedicke J (2012) Weight-based victimization among adolescents in the school setting: emotional reactions and coping behaviors. J Youth Adolesc 41(1):27–40. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9713-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingebjørg Hestetun
    • 1
  • Martin Veel Svendsen
    • 2
  • Inger Margaret Oellingrath
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryTelemark HospitalSkienNorway
  2. 2.Department of Occupational and Environmental MedicineTelemark HospitalSkienNorway
  3. 3.Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Health StudiesTelemark University CollegePorsgrunnNorway

Personalised recommendations