Advertisement

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 133–140 | Cite as

Normal variation in behavioral adjustment relates to regional differences in cortical thickness in children

  • Kristine B. WalhovdEmail author
  • Christian K. Tamnes
  • Ylva Østby
  • Paulina Due-Tønnessen
  • Anders M. Fjell
Original Contribution

Abstract

Neuroanatomical correlates of developmental psychopathology such as attention deficit hyperactivity and conduct disorder have been identified. The majority of studies point to lesser gray matter in psychopathology, often involving prefrontal cortices. The goal of this study was to test whether similar neural correlates exist for behavioral variance in healthy children and adolescents. A large sample (n = 106) aged 8–19 years underwent MR scanning and their parents completed the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire. The relationships between cortical thickness and conduct problems and hyperactivity/inattention scale scores were investigated throughout the cerebrum. No associations were found between normal variance in hyperactivity/inattention and cortical thickness. Normal variance in conduct problems was associated with thinner left hemisphere prefrontal and supramarginal cortices. Relationships between conduct problems and cortical thickness interacted with age, with the greatest differences in cortical thickness seen in the younger children. These interactions were observed in the anterior cingulate, orbitofrontal, middle and superior frontal, as well as lateral and medial temporal cortices. In conclusion, the results indicate neurobiological continuity between symptoms of conduct problems within the normal range, and conduct disorder. Relationships of thinner cortices and conduct problems were primarily seen in younger children, and appeared to decrease with age, indicative of different maturational trajectories in the groups. The long-term consequences are unknown, and the results point to a need for longitudinal studies of developmental trajectories of neuroanatomical foundations of behavioral adjustment.

Keywords

Cortical thickness Orbitofrontal cortex Cingulate cortex Conduct problems Maturation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank all participants and their families. This work was supported by grants from the Norwegian Research Council (177404/W50 and 186092/V50 to K.B.W., 170837/V50 to Ivar Reinvang, PhD, CSHC, University of Oslo, Norway), the University of Oslo (to K.B.W.), and the Department of Psychology, University of Oslo (to A.M.F.).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

787_2012_241_MOESM1_ESM.tif (4.1 mb)
Online Figure 1 Significant negative relationships between age and cortical thickness were seen bilaterally throughout most of the cortical mantle, both medially (upper panel) and laterally (lower panel) (cluster-wise p < .05, two-tailed, fully corrected for multiple comparisons across space). The results are shown as color-coded overlays and projected onto an inflated template brain. (TIFF 4209 kb)
787_2012_241_MOESM2_ESM.tif (4.4 mb)
Online Figure 2 Cortical thickness and conduct problems with IQ as a covariate in addition to age and sex Conduct problems was negatively related to cortical thickness in two clusters in the left hemisphere (cluster-wise p < .05, two-tailed, fully corrected for multiple comparisons across space). Sex and age were included as covariates. No relationships were seen in the opposite direction. The results are shown as color-coded overlays and projected onto an inflated template brain. (TIFF 4482 kb)
787_2012_241_MOESM3_ESM.tif (3.9 mb)
Online Figure 3 Age – conduct problems interactions on cortical thickness with IQ as a covariate in addition to age and sex Significant interactions between age and conduct problems were seen in three clusters in the left and two clusters in the right hemisphere (cluster-wise p < .05, two-tailed, fully corrected for multiple comparisons across space). All interactions were positive, meaning that thickness and conduct problems were more closely related in the younger than the older children. No relationships were seen in the opposite direction. The results are shown as color-coded overlays and projected onto an inflated template brain. (TIFF 4015 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson SW, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR (2000) Long-term sequelae of prefrontal cortex damage acquired in early childhood. Dev Neuropsychol 18:281–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson SW, Wisnowski JL, Barrash J, Damasio H, Tranel D (2009) Consistency of neuropsychological outcome following damage to prefrontal cortex in the first years of life. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 31:170–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bussing R, Grudnik J, Mason D, Wasiak M, Leonard C (2002) ADHD and conduct disorder: an MRI study in a community sample. World J Biol Psychiatry 3:216–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI (1999) Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9:179–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dale AM, Sereno MI (1993) Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J Cogn Neurosci 5:162–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Brito SA, Mechelli A, Wilke M, Laurens KR, Jones AP, Barker GJ, Hodgins S, Viding E (2009) Size matters: increased grey matter in boys with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits. Brain 132:843–852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Desikan RS, Segonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, Buckner RL, Dale AM, Maguire RP, Hyman BT, Albert MS, Killiany RJ (2006) An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 31:968–980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elliott R, Dolan RJ, Frith CD (2000) Dissociable functions in the medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from human neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex 10:308–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fairchild G, Passamonti L, Hurford G, Hagan CC, von dem Hagen EA, van Goozen SH, Goodyer IM, Calder AJ (2011) Brain structure abnormalities in early-onset and adolescent-onset conduct disorder. Am J Psychiatry 168:624–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fellows LK, Farah MJ (2005) Is anterior cingulate cortex necessary for cognitive control? Brain J Neurol 128:788–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fischl B, Dale AM (2000) Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:11050–11055PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fischl B, Liu A, Dale AM (2001) Automated manifold surgery: constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:70–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM (1999) Cortical surface-based analysis. II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 9:195–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fischl B, Sereno MI, Tootell RB, Dale AM (1999) High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp 8:272–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fischl B, van der Kouwe A, Destrieux C, Halgren E, Segonne F, Salat DH, Busa E, Seidman LJ, Goldstein J, Kennedy D, Caviness V, Makris N, Rosen B, Dale AM (2004) Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 14:11–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gogtay N, Giedd JN, Lusk L, Hayashi KM, Greenstein D, Vaituzis AC, Nugent TF 3rd, Herman DH, Clasen LS, Toga AW, Rapoport JL, Thompson PM (2004) Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:8174–8179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goodman R (1997) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38:581–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goodman A, Goodman R (2009) Strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a dimensional measure of child mental health. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 48:400–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hagler DJ Jr, Saygin AP, Sereno MI (2006) Smoothing and cluster thresholding for cortical surface-based group analysis of fMRI data. Neuroimage 33:1093–1103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hayasaka S, Nichols TE (2003) Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods. Neuroimage 20:2343–2356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huebner T, Vloet TD, Marx I, Konrad K, Fink GR, Herpertz SC, Herpertz-Dahlmann B (2008) Morphometric brain abnormalities in boys with conduct disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 47:540–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kruesi MJ, Casanova MF, Mannheim G, Johnson-Bilder A (2004) Reduced temporal lobe volume in early onset conduct disorder. Psychiatry Res 132:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kuperberg GR, Broome MR, McGuire PK, David AS, Eddy M, Ozawa F, Goff D, West WC, Williams SC, van der Kouwe AJ, Salat DH, Dale AM, Fischl B (2003) Regionally localized thinning of the cerebral cortex in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 60:878–888PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nachev P, Kennard C, Husain M (2008) Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:856–869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Obel C, Heiervang E, Rodriguez A, Heyerdahl S, Smedje H, Sourander A, Guethmundsson OO, Clench-Aas J, Christensen E, Heian F, Mathiesen KS, Magnusson P, Njarethvik U, Koskelainen M, Ronning JA, Stormark KM, Olsen J (2004) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the Nordic countries. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 13(Suppl 2):II32–II39Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Østby Y, Tamnes CK, Fjell AM, Westlye LT, Due-Tønnessen P, Walhovd KB (2009) Heterogeneity in subcortical brain development: a structural magnetic resonance imaging study of brain maturation from 8 to 30 years. J Neurosci 29:11772–11782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pavuluri MN, Yang S, Kamineni K, Passarotti AM, Srinivasan G, Harral EM, Sweeney JA, Zhou XJ (2009) Diffusion tensor imaging study of white matter fiber tracts in pediatric bipolar disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 65:586–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosas HD, Liu AK, Hersch S, Glessner M, Ferrante RJ, Salat DH, van der Kouwe A, Jenkins BG, Dale AM, Fischl B (2002) Regional and progressive thinning of the cortical ribbon in Huntington’s disease. Neurology 58:695–701PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rushworth MF, Krams M, Passingham RE (2001) The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: the distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain. J Cogn Neurosci 13:698–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Salat DH, Buckner RL, Snyder AZ, Greve DN, Desikan RS, Busa E, Morris JC, Dale AM, Fischl B (2004) Thinning of the cerebral cortex in aging. Cereb Cortex 14:721–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Segonne F, Dale AM, Busa E, Glessner M, Salat D, Hahn HK, Fischl B (2004) A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI. Neuroimage 22:1060–1075PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Segonne F, Grimson E, Fischl B (2005) A genetic algorithm for the topology correction of cortical surfaces. Inf Process Med Imaging 19:393–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shaw P, Eckstrand K, Sharp W, Blumenthal J, Lerch JP, Greenstein D, Clasen L, Evans A, Giedd J, Rapoport JL (2007) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by a delay in cortical maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19649–19654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shaw P, Gilliam M, Liverpool M, Weddle C, Malek M, Sharp W, Greenstein D, Evans A, Rapoport J, Giedd J (2011) Cortical development in typically developing children with symptoms of hyperactivity and impulsivity: support for a dimensional view of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry 168:143–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shaw P, Greenstein D, Lerch J, Clasen L, Lenroot R, Gogtay N, Evans A, Rapoport J, Giedd J (2006) Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature 440:676–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tamm L, Menon V, Reiss AL (2006) Parietal attentional system aberrations during target detection in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: event-related fMRI evidence. Am J Psychiatry 163:1033–1043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tamnes CK, Østby Y, Fjell AM, Westlye LT, Due-Tønnessen P, Walhovd KB (2010) Brain maturation in adolescence and young adulthood: regional age-related changes in cortical thickness and white matter volume and microstructure. Cereb Cortex 20:534–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tamnes CK, Østby Y, Walhovd KB, Westlye LT, Due-Tønnessen P, Fjell AM (2010) Neuroanatomical correlates of executive functions in children and adolescents: a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of cortical thickness. Neuropsychologia 48:2496–2508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wahlund K, Kristiansson M (2009) Aggression, psychopathy and brain imaging—review and future recommendations. Int J Law Psychiatry 32:266–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Walhovd KB, Moe V, Slinning K, Due-Tonnessen P, Bjornerud A, Dale AM, van der Kouwe A, Quinn BT, Kosofsky B, Greve D, Fischl B (2007) Volumetric cerebral characteristics of children exposed to opiates and other substances in utero. Neuroimage 36:1331–1344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Walhovd KB, Westlye LT, Moe V, Slinning K, Due-Tonnessen P, Bjornerud A, van der Kouwe A, Dale AM, Fjell AM (2010) White matter characteristics and cognition in prenatally opiate- and polysubstance-exposed children: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Am J Neuroradiol 31:894–900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wechsler D (1999) Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (WASI). The Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rubia K (211) “Cool” inferior frontostriatal dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder versus “hot” ventromedial orbitofrontal-limbic dysfunction in conduct disorder: a review. Biol Psychiatry 15:69–87Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristine B. Walhovd
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christian K. Tamnes
    • 1
  • Ylva Østby
    • 1
  • Paulina Due-Tønnessen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anders M. Fjell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Center for the Study of Human Cognition (CSHC)University of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Oslo University Hospital, RikshospitaletOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations