The volumetric differences of the fronto-temporal region in young offspring of schizophrenic patients
- 161 Downloads
The aim of this study is to examine the volumetric differences of the fronto-temporal region in the offspring of schizophrenic patients in comparison to normal. Twenty-six offspring of chronic schizophrenic patients aged between 8 and 15 years and 23 control children were matched with respect to cranial MRI. Chronic schizophrenic patients were reevaluated with SCID-I to confirm their diagnosis. Parents of children in the control group completed SCL-90-R and were evaluated by clinical interview to exclude any psychotic disorder. The diagnoses of psychiatric disorders in all of the children were established by DSM-IV-based clinical interviews with children and parents. They underwent IQ evaluation by WISC-R and evaluated with cranial MRI. Hippocampus, thalamus, amygdala, corpus callosum, frontal, and temporal lobe volumes were measured and compared by using MANCOVA. After covarying whole brain volume, age and gender, statistically significant decrease in the measurements of corpus callosum and hippocampi, and a non-significant trend toward smaller temporal lobes were observed in the high-risk children. The structure of hippocampal formation and corpus callosum were impaired in the children of the schizophrenic patients which suggests a neurodevelopmental abnormality in subjects with genetic high risk for schizophrenia.
KeywordsSchizophrenia High-risk group Frontotemporal region MRI
This study was presented in part at XVth National Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Congress, April 2005, Istanbul, Turkey, and won the Poster Award of Professor Doctor Fahrettin Kerim Gökay Foundation.
- 5.Dag I (1991) Symptom check list (SCL-90-R); A reliability and validity study. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2:5–12Google Scholar
- 6.Deragotis LR (1977) SCL-90: administration, scoring and procedure manual-I for the revised version. John Hopkins Univ, School of Medicine, Clinical Psychometrics Unit, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
- 7.Diwadkar VA, Sweeney JA, Montrose DM et al (2003) Cognitive impairments and structural MRI abnormalities in schizotypal first degree relatives of schizophrenia patients. Biol Psychiatry 53(Suppl 8):500Google Scholar
- 9.First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M (1997) Structured clinical ınterview for DSM-IV clinical version (SCID-I/CV). American Psychiatric Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 10.Gadow KD, Sprafkin J (2002) Child symptom inventory-4 screening and norms manual. Checkmate Plus, Stony Brook NYGoogle Scholar
- 13.Gur RE, Gur RC (2000) Schizophrenia: brain structure and function. In: Sadock B, Sadock V (eds) Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PhiledelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 15.Johnston EC, Russel KD, Harrison LK, Lawrie SM (2003) The Edinburgh high risk study: current status and future prospects. World Psychiatry 2:45–49Google Scholar
- 22.Matsui M, Yuuki H, Kato K, Takeuchi A, Nishiyama S, Bilker WB et al (2007) Schizotypal disorder and schizophrenia: a profile analysis of neuropsychological functioning in Japanese patients. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 18:1–11Google Scholar
- 28.Ozkurkcugil A, Aydemir O, Yildiz M, Esen A, Koroglu E (1999) Turkish adaptation and reliability study for structural clinical ınterview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders. Ilac ve Tedavi Dergisi 12:233–236Google Scholar
- 39.Stubbe DE (2005) Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. In: Cheng K, Myers KM (eds) Child and adolescent psychiatry: the essentials. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PhiledelphiaGoogle Scholar