European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 301–308 | Cite as

School performance of international adoptees better than expected from cognitive test results

  • Frank Lindblad
  • Monica Dalen
  • Finn Rasmussen
  • Bo Vinnerljung
  • Anders Hjern
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Abstract

Objective

To investigate school performance of international adoptees in relation to their cognitive competence.

Method

From the population of all male Swedish residents born 1973–1976, registered in the census 1985 and with complete test scores from military conscription, the following study groups were identified: Korean adoptees (n = 320), non-Korean adoptees (n = 1,125), siblings (children born by adoptive parents, n = 190) and Swedish majority comparisons (n = 142,024). Global scores from intelligence tests at conscription were compared with grade points from the last compulsory school year (year 9). Linear and logistic regression was applied in statistical analyses.

Results

The mean grade points in theoretical subjects were lower in non-Korean adoptees than in the majority population, but when global test scores from military conscription were adjusted for, outcomes were significantly better, equal for physics, than in the majority population. The grade points of Korean adoptees were higher than in the majority population and the same held true after adjusting for global test scores. When SES was taken into account, the risk of poor school performance (only completed lower subject levels) increased in non-Korean adoptees compared to models only adjusted for age and sex.

Conclusion

Male international adoptees generally perform better in school than expected by their cognitive competence. A cognitive evaluation is important in the assessment of adoptees with learning difficulties.

Keywords

adoption cognition intelligence school 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation. The research position of Frank Lindblad is financed by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research.

References

  1. 1.
    Verhulst FC, Althaus M, Versluis-den Bieman HJ (1990) Problem behavior in international adoptees: I. An epidemiological study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 29:94–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tieman W, van der Ende J, Verhulst FC (2005) Psychiatric disorders in young adult intercountry adoptees: an epidemiological study. Am J Psychiatry 162:592–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hjern A, Lindblad F, Vinnerljung B (2002) Suicide, psychiatric illness and social maladjustment in inter-country adoptees in Sweden. Lancet 360:443–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Juffer F, van IJzendoorn MH (2005) Behavior problems and mental health referrals of international adoptees: a meta-analysis. JAMA 293:2501–2515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jablonska B. Lindberg L, Lindblad F, Hjern A (2008) School performance and hospital admissions because of self-harm—a Swedish national cohort study (submitted)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reynolds AJ, Temple JA, Ou SR, Robertson DL, Mersky JP, Topitzes JW, Niles MD (2007) Effects of a school-based, early childhood intervention on adult health and well-being: a 19-year follow-up of low-income families. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 161:730–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van IJzendoorn MH, Juffer F, Poelhuis CW (2005) Adoption and cognitive development: a meta-analytic comparison of adopted and nonadopted children’s IQ and school performance. Psychol Bull 131:301–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Winick M, Meyer KK, Harris RC (1975) Malnutrition and environmental enrichment by early adoption. Science 190:1173–1175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stams GJ, Juffer F, Rispens J, Hoksbergen RA (2000) The development and adjustment of 7-year-old children adopted in infancy. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 41:1025–1037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Odenstad A, Hjern A, Lindblad F, Rasmussen F, Vinnerljung B, Dalen M (2008) Does age at adoption and geographic origin matter? A national cohort study of cognitive test performance in adult intercountry adoptees. Psychol Med, Mar 26:1–8 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lindblad F, Hjern A, Vinnerljung B (2003) Inter-country adopted children as young adults—a Swedish cohort study. Am J Orthopsychiatry 73:190–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dalen M, Lindblad F, Odenstad A, Rasmussen F, Vinnerljung B, Hjern A (2008) Educational attainment and cognitive competence in adopted men—a study of international and national adoptees, siblings and a general Swedish population. Child Youth Serv Rev 30:1211–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosén M (2002) National health data registers: a Nordic heritage to public health. Scand J Public Health 30:81–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Slavin RE (1987) Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: a best-evidence research synthesis. Rev Educ Res 57:293–336Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    www.skolverket.se. Stockholm: the Swedish National Agency for Education
  17. 17.
    Carlstedt B (2000) Cognitive abilities—aspects of structure, process and measurement. Dissertation. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences, University of GothenburgGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carlstedt B, Mårdberg B (1993) Construct validity of the Swedish Enlistment Battery. Scand J Psychol 34:353–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Statistics Sweden (1982) Socio-economic classification (SEI). Stockholm: SCBGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tahk Y (1986) Intercountry adoption program in Korea; policy, law and services. In: Hoksbergen RA-C (ed) Adoption in worldwide perspective. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, pp 79–91Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim WJ (1995) International adoptiom: a case review of Korean children. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 25:141–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chandra A, Abma J, Maza P, Bachrach C (1999) Adoption, adoption seeking, and relinquishment for adoption in the United States. Adv Data 11:1–16Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim C, Carroll TG (1975) Intercountry adoption of South Korean orphans: a lawyer’s guide. J Fam Law 14:223–253Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Triseliotis J (2000) Intercountry adoption. Global trade or global gift. Adopt Foster 24:45–54Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fonseca C (2002) Un expected reversal. Charting the course of international adoption in Brazil. Adopt Foster 26:28–39Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dumaret A (1985) IQ, Scholastic Performance and Behaviour of Sibs raised in contrasting Environments. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 26:553–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duyme M (1988) School success and social class: an adoption study. Dev Psychol 24:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Duyme M, Dumaret A-C, Tomekiewicz S (1999) How can we boots IQs of “dull children”?: A late adoption study. PNAS 96:8790–8794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Skuy M, Taylor M, O’Carroll S, Fridjhon P, Rosenthal L (2000) Performance of black and white South African children on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—revised and the Kaufman Assessment Battery. Psychol Rep 86:727–737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vinnerljung B (1996) Fosterbarn som vuxna [Foster children as adults]. Arkiv, LundGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff Verlag Darmstadt 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Lindblad
    • 1
    • 2
  • Monica Dalen
    • 3
  • Finn Rasmussen
    • 4
  • Bo Vinnerljung
    • 5
    • 6
  • Anders Hjern
    • 5
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Neuroscience, Child and Adolescent PsychiatryUniversity Hospital of UppsalaUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Stress Research InstituteStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of Special Needs EducationUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  4. 4.Child and Adolescent Public Health Epidemiology Group, Department of Public Health SciencesKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  5. 5.Centre for EpidemiologyNational Board of Health and WelfareStockholmSweden
  6. 6.Institute for Evidence-based Social Work PracticeNational Board of Health and WelfareStockholmSweden
  7. 7.Department of Women’s and Children’s HealthUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations