School performance of international adoptees better than expected from cognitive test results
- 229 Downloads
To investigate school performance of international adoptees in relation to their cognitive competence.
From the population of all male Swedish residents born 1973–1976, registered in the census 1985 and with complete test scores from military conscription, the following study groups were identified: Korean adoptees (n = 320), non-Korean adoptees (n = 1,125), siblings (children born by adoptive parents, n = 190) and Swedish majority comparisons (n = 142,024). Global scores from intelligence tests at conscription were compared with grade points from the last compulsory school year (year 9). Linear and logistic regression was applied in statistical analyses.
The mean grade points in theoretical subjects were lower in non-Korean adoptees than in the majority population, but when global test scores from military conscription were adjusted for, outcomes were significantly better, equal for physics, than in the majority population. The grade points of Korean adoptees were higher than in the majority population and the same held true after adjusting for global test scores. When SES was taken into account, the risk of poor school performance (only completed lower subject levels) increased in non-Korean adoptees compared to models only adjusted for age and sex.
Male international adoptees generally perform better in school than expected by their cognitive competence. A cognitive evaluation is important in the assessment of adoptees with learning difficulties.
Keywordsadoption cognition intelligence school
This study was supported by grants from The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation. The research position of Frank Lindblad is financed by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research.
- 5.Jablonska B. Lindberg L, Lindblad F, Hjern A (2008) School performance and hospital admissions because of self-harm—a Swedish national cohort study (submitted)Google Scholar
- 10.Odenstad A, Hjern A, Lindblad F, Rasmussen F, Vinnerljung B, Dalen M (2008) Does age at adoption and geographic origin matter? A national cohort study of cognitive test performance in adult intercountry adoptees. Psychol Med, Mar 26:1–8 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 15.Slavin RE (1987) Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: a best-evidence research synthesis. Rev Educ Res 57:293–336Google Scholar
- 16.www.skolverket.se. Stockholm: the Swedish National Agency for Education
- 17.Carlstedt B (2000) Cognitive abilities—aspects of structure, process and measurement. Dissertation. Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences, University of GothenburgGoogle Scholar
- 19.Statistics Sweden (1982) Socio-economic classification (SEI). Stockholm: SCBGoogle Scholar
- 20.Tahk Y (1986) Intercountry adoption program in Korea; policy, law and services. In: Hoksbergen RA-C (ed) Adoption in worldwide perspective. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, pp 79–91Google Scholar
- 22.Chandra A, Abma J, Maza P, Bachrach C (1999) Adoption, adoption seeking, and relinquishment for adoption in the United States. Adv Data 11:1–16Google Scholar
- 23.Kim C, Carroll TG (1975) Intercountry adoption of South Korean orphans: a lawyer’s guide. J Fam Law 14:223–253Google Scholar
- 24.Triseliotis J (2000) Intercountry adoption. Global trade or global gift. Adopt Foster 24:45–54Google Scholar
- 25.Fonseca C (2002) Un expected reversal. Charting the course of international adoption in Brazil. Adopt Foster 26:28–39Google Scholar
- 30.Vinnerljung B (1996) Fosterbarn som vuxna [Foster children as adults]. Arkiv, LundGoogle Scholar