Phenomenology, socio-demographic factors and outcome upon discharge of manic and mixed episodes in hospitalized adolescents
- 174 Downloads
The existence of bipolar disorder type I (BD-I) during adolescence is now clearly established whereas there are still some controversies on BD-II and BD-NOS diagnosis, mainly in Europe (O’Dowd in Br Med J 29, 2006). Little is known on the phenomenology and potential short-term prognosis factors of bipolar episodes in this age population. In particular, very few studies examine this issue on inpatients in the European context of free access to care.
To describe the phenomenology of acute manic and mixed episodes in hospitalized adolescents and to analyse potential predictive factors associated with clinical improvement at discharge and length of hospitalization.
A total of 80 subjects, aged 12–20 years, consecutively hospitalized for a manic or mixed episode. Socio-demographic and clinical data were extracted by reviewing patients’ charts. We used a multivariate analysis to evaluate short-term outcome predictors.
The sample was characterized by severe impairment, high rates of psychotic features (N = 50, 62.5%), a long duration of stay (mean 80.4 days), and an overall good improvement (86% very much or much improved). Thirty-three (41.3 %) patients had a history of depressive episodes, 13 (16.3%) had manic or brief psychotic episodes but only 3 (3.7%) had a history of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorders. More manic episodes than mixed episodes were identified in subjects with mental retardation (MR) and in subjects from migrant and/or low socio-economic families. Overall severity and female gender predicted better improvement in GAF scores. Poor insight and the existence of psychotic features predicted longer duration of stay.
These results suggest that severe manic and mixed episodes in adolescents with BD-I need prolonged inpatient care to improve and that socio-cultural factors and MR should be examined more closely in youth with BD.
Keywordsbipolar disorder type I acute episode adolescent prognosis socio-cultural factors
This study was funded by grants from the French Ministry of Health (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique AOM 06-088) and the Fondation Wyeth pour la Santé de l’Enfant et de l’Adolescent. AC was partly supported by Sanofi-Synthélabo France through a grant awarded for her PhD research on the outcome of bipolar type 1 disorder in adolescents. We thank Professor Boris Birmaher from Pittsburg University for his helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
- 6.Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Overoll JE, Gorham DR (1962); traduction française Pichot, 1973Google Scholar
- 11.Carlson GA (2005) Early onset bipolar disorder: clinical and research considerations. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 34:335–345Google Scholar
- 15.Clinical Global Impressions (CGI ) In: Guy W, Bonato RR (eds) (1970) Manual for the ECDEU Assessment Battery, 2nd Rev edn. National Institute of Mental Health, Chevy Chase, pp 12-1–12-6Google Scholar
- 19.Diagnostic Inteview for Genetic Studies (DIGS) Nurnberger et al (1994); traduction française C. Laurent (French translation Claudine Laurent)Google Scholar
- 21.Global Assessment of functioning Scale (GAF) Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Fleiss J et al (1976); traduction française J. D. Guelfi et al (1989)Google Scholar
- 24.Geller B, Zimerman B, Williams M, Delbello MP, Bolhofner K, Craney JL, Frazier J, Beringer L, Nickelsburg MJ (2002) DSM-IV mania symptoms in a prepubertal and early adolescent bipolar disorder phenotype compared to attention-deficit hyperactive and normal controls. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 12:11–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Klein R, Pine DS, Klein DF (1998) Resolved: mania is mistaken for ADHD in prepubertal children. Negative. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 37:1093–1096Google Scholar
- 37.Kraepelin E (1921) Manic depressive insanity and paranoia. E & S Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
- 42.Luckasson R, Borthwick-Duffy S, Buntix W et al (2002) Mental retardation: definition, classification, and systems of supports, 10th edn. AAMR, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 44.O’Dowd A (2006) NICE issues new guidance to improve the treatment of bipolar disorder. Br Med J 29Google Scholar
- 48.Perlis RH, Miyahara S, Marangell LB, Wisniewski SR, Ostacher M, Delbello MP, Bowden CL, Sachs GS, Nierenberg AA (2004) Long-term implications of early onset in bipolar disorder: data from the first 1000 participants in the systematic treatment enhancement program for bipolar disorder (STEP-BD). Biol Psychiatry 55:875–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar