European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 157–167 | Cite as

Childhood depression: a place for psychotherapy

An outcome study comparing individual psychodynamic psychotherapy and family therapy
  • Judith TrowellEmail author
  • Ilan Joffe
  • Jesse Campbell
  • Carmen Clemente
  • Fredrik Almqvist
  • Mika Soininen
  • Ulla Koskenranta-Aalto
  • Sheila Weintraub
  • Gerasimos Kolaitis
  • Vlassis Tomaras
  • Dimitris Anastasopoulos
  • Kate Grayson
  • Jacqueline Barnes
  • John Tsiantis



Although considered clinically effective, there is little systematic research confirming the use of Individual Psychodynamic Psychotherapy or Family Therapy as treatments for depression in children and young adolescents.


A clinical trial assessed the effectiveness of these two forms of psychotherapy in treating moderate and severe depression in this age group.


A randomised control trial was conducted with 72 patients aged 9–15 years allocated to one of two treatment groups.


Significant reductions in disorder rates were seen for both Individual Therapy and Family Therapy. A total of 74.3% of cases were no longer clinically depressed following Individual Therapy and 75.7% of cases were no longer clinically depressed following Family Therapy. This included cases of Dysthymia and “Double Depression” (co-existing Major Depressive Disorder and Dysthymia). There was also an overall reduction in co-morbid conditions across the study. The changes in both treatment groups were persistent and there was ongoing improvement. At follow up six months after treatment had ended, 100% of cases in the Individual Therapy group, and 81% of cases in the Family Therapy group were no longer clinically depressed.


This study provides evidence supporting the use of focused forms of both Individual Psychodynamic Therapy and Family Therapy for moderate to severe depression in children and young adolescents.


treatment childhood depression individual psychotherapy family therapy 



Members of the London project team: Anne Alvarez, Sarah Barratt, Vicky Bianco, Susan Bliss, David Campbell, Jane Cassidy, Lois Colling, Carol Desousa (statistician), Emilia Dowling, Elspeth Earle, Anna Fitzgerald, Henia Goldberg, Inge Gregorious, Agathe Gretton, Judith Loose, Ryan Lowe, Sue McNab, Gillian Miles, Renos Papadopoulos, David Pentacost, Maria Rhode, Margaret Rustin.

Members of the Athens project team: Alexandra Alexopoulou, Evi Athanassiadou, Maria Belivanaki, Vaso Chantzara, Stelios Christogiorgos, Kostas Francis, Dimitris Georgiadis, Georgios Gritzelas, Terpsi Korpa, Olga Lanara, Effie Lignos, Dimitris Magriplis, Maria Marangidi, Olga Maratos, Vasso Moula, Valeria Pomini, Eleni Stavrou, Marianna Tassi, Irene Tsanira, L. Tsarouhi.

Members of the Helsinki project team: Christina Bostrom, Taru Forst, Reija Graeffe, Susanne Friman, Kaarina Hastbacka, Liisa Hisinger, Eija Korpinen, Anna Kuikka, Sakari Lehtonen, Helena Lounavaara-Rintala, Kaija Mankinen, Pirkko Pingoud, Liisa Pirhonen, Marja Schulman, Esko Varilo, Leena Varilo, Maija von Fieandt, Pirjo Vuornos, Jan-Christer Wahlbeck, Hanna Westerinen.

We would also like to thank the young people and their families for their contribution to the study.

This study was partly funded by the European Community: Concerted action contract No. BMH4-CT98-3231 DG12-SSMI. Central co-ordination of the project took place at the Tavistock Clinic, London. Prof Kolvin was funded whilst developing the project by the Leverhulme Foundation.


  1. 1.
    Angold A, Costello EJ, Pickles A, et al. (1987) The development of a questionnaire for use in epidemiological studies of depression in children and adolescents. Institute of Psychiatry, London University, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asarnow JR, Tompson M, Hamilton EB, et al. (1994) Family-expressed emotion, childhood-onset depression, and childhood-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders: is expressed emotion a non-specific correlate of child psychopathology or a specific risk factor for depression? J Abnorm Child Psychol 22:129–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. (1996) Improving the quality of reporting of Randomised Controlled Trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 276:637–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Birmaher B, Brent D, Kolko D, et al. (2000) Clinical outcome after short-term psychotherapy for adolescents with major depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57(1):29–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brent DA, Holder D, Kolko D, et al. (1997) A clinical psychotherapy trial for adolescent depression comparing cognitive, family, and supportive therapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54:877–885PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Byng-Hall J (1995) Re-writing family scripts: improvisation and systems change. Guilford Press, New York & LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Byng-Hall J, Campbell DC (1981) Resolving conflicts in distance regulation: an integrative approach. J Marital Fam Ther 7:321–330Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM) (2003) Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors (SSRIs): overview of regulatory status and CSM advice relating to major depressive disorder (MDD) in children and adolescents including a summary of available safety and efficacy data:
  9. 9.
    Chambers W, Puig-Antich J, Hirsch M, et al. (1985) The assessment of affective disorders in children and adolescents by semi-structured interview: test–retest reliability of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for school-age children, present episode version. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42:696–702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davenloo H (1978) Basic principles and techniques in short term dynamic psychotherapy. Spectrum Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diamond G, Serrano A, Dickey M, et al. (1995) Current status of family-based outcome and process research. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 35(1):6–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elkin I, Shea MT, Watkins JT, et al. (1989) National Institute of Mental Health treatment of depression collaborative research program, general effectiveness of treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46:971–983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Emslie GJ, Rush AJ, Weinberg WA, et al. (1997) A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine in children and adolescents with depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54:1031–1037PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Emslie GJ, Heiligenstein JH, Hoog S, et al. (2000) Fluoxetine for acute treatment of depression in children and adolescents: a placebo controlled, randomised clinical trial. Paper presented at 39th Annual Meeting of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, December 10–14, 2000, San Juan, Puerto RicoGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garvin V, Leber D, Kalter N (1991) Children of divorce: predictors of change following preventive intervention. Am J Orthopsychiatry 61(3):438–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goodyer IM, Herbert J, Secher SM, et al. (1997) Short-term outcome of major depression: I. Comorbidity and severity at presentation as predictors of persistent disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:179–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harrington R, Dubicka B (2002) Adolescent depression: an evidence-based approach to intervention. Curr Opin Psychiatry 15:369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harrington R, Whittaker J, Shoebridge P (1998a) Psychological treatment of depression in children and adolescents. A review of treatment research. Br J Psychiatry 173(10):291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harrington R, Whittaker J, Shoebridge P, et al. (1998b) Systematic review of efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapies in childhood and adolescent depressive disorder. Br Med J 316:1559–1563Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harter S (1990) Causes, correlates and the functional role of global self-worth: a life-span perspective. In: Sternberg RJ, Kolligian J (eds) Competence considered. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 67–97Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kazdin AE (1986) Comparative outcome studies of psychotherapy: methodological issues and strategies. J Consult Clin Psychol 54:95–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kolvin I, Garside RE, Nicol AR, et al. (1981/5) Help starts here: the maladjusted child in the ordinary school Tavistock Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kolvin I, MacMillan A, Nicol AR, et al. (1988) Psychotherapy is effective. J R Soc Med 261–266Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kolvin I, Barrett L, Bhate SR, et al. (1991) The Newcastle child depression project: diagnosis and classification of depression. Br J Psychiatry 159(11):9–21Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kolvin I, Trowell J, Tsiantis J et al (1999) Psychotherapy for childhood depression. In: Maj M, Sartorius N (eds) Evidence and experience in psychiatry, WPA Series, vol 1. John Wiley & sons LtdGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kovacs M (1981) Rating scales to assess depression in school aged children. Acta Paedopsychiatr 46:305–315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kovacs M, Bastiaens LJ (1995) The psychotherapeutic management of major depressive and dysthymic disorders in childhood and adolescence, issues and prospects. In: Goodyer IM (ed) The depressed child and adolescent. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Malan DH, Osimo F (1992) Psychodynamics, training and outcome in brief psychotherapy. Butterworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    March J, Silva S, Petrycki JC, et al. (2004) Fluoxetine, Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy, and their combination for adolescents with depression. Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS) Randomised Controlled Trial. J Am Med Assoc 292(7):807–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Muratori F, Picchi L, Bruni G, et al. (2003) A two-year follow-up of psychodynamic psychotherapy for internalising disorders in children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42(3): 331–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parloff MB (1986) Placebo controls in psychotherapy research: a sine qua non or a placebo for research problems. J Consult Clin Psychol 54:79–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shaffer D, Gould MS, Brasic J (1993) A children’s global assessment scale (C GAS). Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:1228–1231Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tsiantis J, Kolvin I, Anastasopoulos D, et al. (2005) Psychotherapy for early adolescent depression (PEAD): a comparison of two psychotherapeutic interventions in three European countries. In: Hibbs ED, Jensen P (eds) Psychosocial treatments for child and adolescent disorders: empirically based strategies for clinical practice. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 267–293Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Will D, Wrate RM (1985) Integrated Family Therapy. Tavistock Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wood A, Harrington R, Moore A (1996) Controlled trial of brief cognitive behavioural intervention in adolescent patients with depressive disorders. J Clin Psychol Psychiatry 37:737–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith Trowell
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ilan Joffe
    • 2
  • Jesse Campbell
    • 3
  • Carmen Clemente
    • 4
  • Fredrik Almqvist
    • 5
  • Mika Soininen
    • 5
  • Ulla Koskenranta-Aalto
    • 5
  • Sheila Weintraub
    • 5
  • Gerasimos Kolaitis
    • 6
  • Vlassis Tomaras
    • 7
  • Dimitris Anastasopoulos
    • 6
  • Kate Grayson
    • 8
  • Jacqueline Barnes
    • 9
  • John Tsiantis
    • 6
  1. 1.Professor of Child Mental Health, West Midlands NIMHE/CSIP, Honorary Consultant Child & Adolescent PsychiatristTavistock ClinicLondonUK
  2. 2.Hertfordshire Partnership NHS Trust, Child & Family ClinicMarlowes Health CentreHemel HempsteadUK
  3. 3.Tavistock ClinicLondonUK
  4. 4.Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, Department of Child & Adolescent PsychiatryRoyal Free HospitalLondonUK
  5. 5.Department of Child Psychiatry, The Hospital for Children & Adolescents, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  6. 6.Department of Child Psychiatry, Aghia Sophia Children’s HospitalAthens University Medical SchoolAthensGreece
  7. 7.Department of Psychiatry, Eginition HospitalAthens University Medical SchoolAthensGreece
  8. 8.Statistics By DesignCamberlyUK
  9. 9.Institute for the Study of Children, Families and Social Issues, BirkbeckUniversity of London7 Bedford SquareUK

Personalised recommendations