A parent questionnaire for distinguishing between reactive and proactive aggression in children
- 374 Downloads
Evidence suggests that reactive and proactive aggression can be distinguished on the basis of teacher-rating scales. In this article a newly developed parent-rated questionnaire that aims to distinguish between reactive and proactive aggression is evaluated with regard to its structure and validity.
In study 1, a confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the data of 442 children aged 6–12 years of a general population. Study 2 examined the relations between the two forms of aggression and hostile intentions, expected outcome of aggression, ADHD symptoms and callous-unemotional traits in a sample of 40 normal and 40 disruptive behaviour disordered boys aged 8–12 years.
The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the two-factor model, unlike a singlefactor model, produced a reasonable fit to the data. The results of study 2 showed that the correlations between the different variables and reactive aggression differed from the correlations with proactive aggression in ways that were consistent with theoretical definitions and earlier findings.
These results, in addition to those of earlier studies using teacher-rating scales, suggest that it is possible to make a valid distinction between reactive and proactive aggression using this newly developed parent-rated questionnaire.
Key wordsreactive aggression proactive aggression parentrating scale disruptive behaviour disorder
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Achenbach TM (1991a) Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington VT University of Vermont Department of PsychiatryGoogle Scholar
- 2.American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric AssociationGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bandura A (1973) Aggression: a social learning theory analysis. New York: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
- 4.Berkowitz L (1978) Whatever happened to the frustration-aggression hypothesis? Am Behav Scientist 32:691–708Google Scholar
- 5.Brown K, Atkins MS, Osborne ML, Milnamow M (1996) A revised teacher rating scale for reactive and proactive aggression. J Abn Child Psychol 24:473–480Google Scholar
- 10.Dodge KA, Lochman JE, Harnish JD, Bates JE, Pettit GS (1997) Reactive and proactive aggression in school children and psychiatrically impaired chronically assaultive youth. J Abn Psychol 106:37–51Google Scholar
- 11.Frick PJ, Cornell AH, Barry CT, Bodin SD, Dane HE (2003) Callous-unemotional traits and conduct problems in the prediction of conduct problem severity, aggression, and self-report of delinquency. J Abn Child Psychol 31:457–470Google Scholar
- 12.Frick PJ, Hare RD (2001) The Antisocial Process Screening Device. Toronto: Multi-Health SystemsGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model 6:1–55Google Scholar
- 17.Pardini DA, Lochman JE, Frick PJ (2003) Callous/unemotional traits and social-cognitive processes in adjudicated youths. J Am Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42:364–371Google Scholar
- 20.Price JM, Dodge KA (1989) Reactive and proactive aggression in childhood: Relations to peer status and social context dimensions. J Abn Child Psychol 17:455–471Google Scholar
- 21.Sattler JM (1992) Assessment of children (3rd ed., rev). San Diego, CA: Sattler JMGoogle Scholar
- 22.Shaffer D, Fischer P, Lucas CP, Dulcan MK, Schwab-Stone ME (2000) The NIMH diagnostic interview schedule for children version IV: Description, differences from previous versions and reliability of some common diagnosis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 29:28–38Google Scholar
- 23.Wechsler D (1974) Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological CorporationGoogle Scholar