Children and adolescents with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in non-specialist settings
- 157 Downloads
Adolescents with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) seen in specialist centres have substantial psychological and functional impairment. Beliefs about activity levels may be important in the development of CFS.
The aim was to investigate psychological and functional impairment, and beliefs in children and adolescents with CFS recruited from non-specialist services. A total of 30 such individuals participated, and 30 young people with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) formed the comparison group.
Emotional symptoms and disorder were high in both groups. In all, 50% of those with CFS and 30% with IBD reached the threshold for emotional disorder according to the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) parent report, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Participants with CFS scored statistically significantly higher on measures of functional impairment, including school non-attendance, compared to those with IBD. According to questionnaire responses, those with CFS were statistically significantly more likely to favour rest rather than exercise compared to those with IBD. Comparison of parental beliefs did not show such a difference.
These young people with CFS were at high risk of psychiatric disorder. They were substantially disabled when compared to individuals with a known chronic illness. Also, as a group, they were characterised by a preference for rest rather than exercise.
Key wordsChronic Fatigue Syndrome adolescents beliefs psychological school
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Altman DG, Machin D, Bryant TN, Gardner MJ (2000) Statistics with Confidence. BMJ Publishing Group,LondonGoogle Scholar
- 2.Association of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Working Group on CFS (1999) Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: Recommendations for Current Best Practice. In: Garralda E (ed) Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Helping children and adolescents, Occasional Paper No16 supplement. London, The Association for Child Psychology and PsychiatryGoogle Scholar
- 3.Brace MJ, Scott MS, McCauley E, Sherry DD (2000) Family reinforcement of illness behavior: a comparison of adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome, juvenile arthritis and healthy controls. Dev Behav Pediatr 21:332–339Google Scholar
- 9.CFS/ME Working Group (2001) Report to the Chief Medical Officer of an independent working group. Dept of Health, London. http://www.doh.gov.uk/cmo/cfsmereport/index.htm//2002Google Scholar
- 18.Meltzer H, Gatwood R, Goodman R, Ford T (2000) Mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain. The Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 19.Norussis MJ (2000) SPSS for Windows. SPSS Inc., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 20.Perrin EC, Stein RE, Drotar D (1991) Cautions in using the Child Behavior Checklist: observations based on research about children with a chronic illness. J Pediatr Psychol 16:4114–421Google Scholar
- 25.Rose D, O’Reilly K (1998) The ERSC Review of Government Social Classifications. Economic and Social Research Council and Office for National Statistics, Swindon and LondonGoogle Scholar
- 26.Sharpe M (1999) Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. In: Garralda E (ed) Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Helping Children and Adolescents, Occasional Paper No. 16. London, The Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry, pp 5–8Google Scholar
- 27.Sharpe M, Archard LC, Banatvala JE, Borysiewicz LK, Clare AW, David A, Edwards RHT, Hawton, KEH, Lambert HP, Lane RJM, McDonald EM, Mowbray JF, Pearson DJ, Peto, TEA, Preedy VR, Smith AP, Smith DG, Taylor DJ, Tyrrel DAJ, Wessely S, White PD (1991) A report—chronic fatigue syndrome: guidelines for research. J R Soc Med 84:118–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Wessely S, Hotopf M, Sharpe M (1998) Chronic Fatigue and its Syndromes. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar