Advertisement

Mechanical stability of all-ceramic abutments retained with three different screw materials in two-piece zirconia implants—an in vitro study

  • Michael Stimmelmayr
  • Anna Lang
  • Florian Beuer
  • Sonia Mansour
  • Kurt Erdelt
  • Gerald Krennmair
  • Jan-Frederik Güth
Original Article
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

To measure the abutment rotation and fracture load of two-piece zirconia implants screwed with three different abutment screw materials.

Material and methods

Thirty-six zirconia implants with 36 zirconia abutments were distributed into 3 test groups: group G connected with gold screws, group T with titanium screws, and group P with peek screws. In the first part of the study, the rotation angle of the abutments was measured. The second part of the study measured the maximum fracture force of adhesively bonded lithium disilicate crowns after artificial aging and fracture modes were reported.

Results

In group G, the median rotation angle was 8.0°, in group T 11.6°, and in group P 9.5°. After artificial aging, no screw loosening, crown, abutment, or implant fracture occurred. The median fracture force in group G was 250 N, in group T 263 N, and in group P 196 N.

Conclusions

Rotation angles and fracture loads of two-piece zirconia implants with gold, titanium, or peek screws showed no significant differences; however, fracture loads showed inferior results for group P.

Clinical relevance

The indication for the material peek as an abutment screw is still questionable and should be considered carefully.

Keywords

All-ceramic implant All-ceramic abutment Two-piece implant Fatigue load test Abutment screw material 

Notes

Funding

The study was funded by Swiss Dental Solutions. Funding number 82672009 LMU Munich.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Osman RB, Swain MV (2015) A critical review of dental materials with an emphasis on titanium versus zirconia. Materials (Basel) 8:932–958CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fretwurst T, Nelson K, Tarnow DP, Wang HL, Giannobile WV (2018) Is metal particle release associated with peri-implant bone destruction? An emerging concept. J Dent Res 97:259–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pieralli S, Kohal RJ, Jung RE, Vach K, Spies BC (2017) Clinical outcomes of zirconia dental implants: a systematic review. J Dent Res 96:38–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spies BC, Nold J, Vach K, Kohal RJ (2016) Two-piece zirconia oral implants withstand masticatory loads: an investigation in the artificial mouth. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 53:1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cionca N, Hashim D, Mombelli A (2017) Zirconia dental implants: where are we now, and where are we heading? Periodontol 73:241–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene V (2011) The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant restorations. Clin Oral Impl Res 22:1379–1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Staubli N, Walter C, Schmidt JC, Weiger R, Zitzmann NU (2017) Excess cement and the risk of peri-implant disease – a systematic review. Clin Oral Implant Res 28:1278–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neumann EA, Villar CC, França FM (2014) Fracture resistance of abutment screws made of titanium, polyetheretherketone, and carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone. Braz Oral Res 28:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwitalla AD, Abou-Emara M, Zimmermann T, Spintig T, Beuer F, Lackmann J, Müller WD (2016) The applicability of PEEK-based abutment screws. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 63:244–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rho JY, Ashman RB, Turner CH (1993) Young’s modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. J Biomech 26:111–119CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Semper W, Kraft S, Mehrhof J, Nelson K (2010) Impact of abutment rotation and angulation on marginal fit: theoretical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25:752–758PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Semper-Hogg W, Zulauf K, Mehrhof J, Nelson K (2015) The influence of torque tightening on the position stability of the abutment in conical implant-abutment connections. Int J Prosthodont 28:538–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Han KH, Lee JY, Shin SW (2016) Implant- and tooth-supported fixed prostheses using a high-performance polymer (pekkton) framework. Int J Prosthodont 29:451–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sivaraman K, Chopra A, Narayan AI, Balakrishnan D (2018) Is zirconia a viable alternative to titanium for oral implant? A critical review. J Prosthodont Res 62:121–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hashim D, Cionca N, Courvoisier DS, Mombelli A (2016) A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants. Clin Oral Invest 20:1403–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kohal RJ, Spies BC, Bauer A, Butz F (2018) One-piece zirconia oral implants for single-tooth replacement: three-year results from a long-term prospective cohort study. J Clin Periodontol 45:114–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kohal RJ, Finke HC, Klaus G (2009) Stability of prototype two-piece zirconia and titanium implants after artificial aging: an in vitro pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 11:323–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kammermeier A, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Schneider-Feyrer PV (2016) In vitro performance of one- and two-piece zirconia implant systems for anterior application. J Dent 53:94–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cionca N, Müller N, Mombelli A (2015) Two-piece-zirconia implants supporting all-ceramic crowns. A prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Impl Res 26:413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Payer M, Heschl A, Koller M, Arnetzl G, Lorenzoni M, Jaske N (2015) All-ceramic restoration of zirconia two-piece implants – a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Impl Res 26:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Preis V, Kammermeier A, Handel G, Rosentritt M (2016) In vitro performance of two-piece zirconia implant systems for anterior application. Dent Mater 32:765–774CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sanon C, Chevalier J, Douillard T, Cattani-Lorente M, Scherrer SS, Gremillard L (2015) A new testing protocol for zirconia dental implants. Dent Mater 31:15–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gehrke P, Johansson D, Fischer C, Stawarczyk B, Hum RB, Beuer F (2015) In vitro fatigue and fracture resistance of one- and two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 30:546–554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alsahhaf A, Spies BC, Vach K, Kohal RJ (2017) Fracture resistance of zirconia-based implant abutments after artificial long-term aging. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 66:224–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stimmelmayr M, Heiss P, Erdelt K, Schweiger J, Beuer F (2017) Fracture resistance of different implant abutments supporting all-ceramic single crowns after aging. Int J Comp Dent 20:53–64Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stimmelmayr M, Sagerer S, Erdelt K, Beuer F (2013) In-vitro fatigue and fracture strength testing of one-piece zirconia implant abutments and zirconia implant abutments connected to titanium cores. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:488–493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Stimmelmayr
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anna Lang
    • 2
  • Florian Beuer
    • 3
  • Sonia Mansour
    • 3
  • Kurt Erdelt
    • 2
  • Gerald Krennmair
    • 4
  • Jan-Frederik Güth
    • 2
  1. 1.Private Practice for Oral SurgeryChamGermany
  2. 2.Department of ProsthodonticsUniversity of MunichMunichGermany
  3. 3.Department of Prosthodontics and GerontostomtologyUniversity of BerlinBerlinGermany
  4. 4.Dental SchoolUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations