Advertisement

Randomised clinical trial investigating self-assembling peptide P11-4 in the treatment of early caries

  • F. Bröseler
  • C. Tietmann
  • C. Bommer
  • T. Drechsel
  • M. Heinzel-Gutenbrunner
  • S. Jepsen
Original Article
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

This prospective, randomised, split-mouth, clinical trial compared the efficacy of the self-assembling peptide P11-4 to fluoride varnish in the treatment of early buccal carious lesions.

Materials and methods

Subjects presenting at least two clinically affected teeth were treated at D0 (day 0) and D90 with P11-4 (test) or fluoride varnish (control). At D180, fluoride varnish was applied on all study lesions. Standardised photographs were taken at D0, D30, D90, D180 and D360 and blindly morphometrically assessed. Hierarchical linear models (HLM) under allowance of confounders were used to compare the decrease in size between test and control groups. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Global Impression of Change Questionnaire (GICQ) were used as clinical assessments.

Results

Overall, 37 subjects (13–36 years) with 90 early carious lesions were included. HLM analysis showed a significant difference between test and control groups, indicating a decrease in test lesions and stabilisation of control lesions size (p = 0.001). The test lesion’s mean size (SD) relative to baseline decreased to D30 = 0.936(0.127), D90 = 0.874(0.173), D180 = 0.844(0.215) and D360 = 0.862(0.352), whereas control lesions remained stable at D30 = 1.018(0.209), D90 = 1.013(0.207), D180 = 1.029(0.235) and D360 = 1.068(0.401). The effect sizes ranged from 0.47 to 0.82.

Conclusions

Within the limits of this study, it was shown that the size of early carious lesions treated with P11-4 was significantly reduced; this result was superior to that of fluoride varnish treatment (DRKS00012941).

Clinical relevance

The self-assembling peptide P11-4 is the first caries treatment approach aiming to regenerate decayed enamel. P11-4 initiates formation of de novo hydroxyapatite in the depth of early carious lesions, adding a new advanced therapy option for preventive dentistry.

Keywords

Enamel Carious lesion Remineralisation Dental decay Fluoride Guided Enamel Regeneration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms. Jaqueline Schröder, ZFA, staff of Private Practice Periodontology, Aachen/Germany for serving as study nurse throughout the entire project.

Funding

The work was supported by credentis ag, Windisch, Switzerland. F. Bröseler, C. Tietmann and M. Heinzel-Gutenbrunner received compensation for the work performed within the clinical study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

784_2019_2901_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (133 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 133 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K et al (2012) Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380(9859):2197–2223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gonzalez-Cabezas C (2010) The chemistry of caries: remineralization and demineralization events with direct clinical relevance. Dent Clin N Am 54(3):469–478 doi:S0011-8532(10)00020-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Innes NPT, Schwendicke F (2017) Restorative thresholds for carious lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 96(5):501–508.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517693605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Backer Dirks O (1966) Posteruptive changes in dental enamel. J Dent Res 45:503–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Featherstone JD (2009) Remineralization, the natural caries repair process--the need for new approaches. Adv Dent Res 21(1):4–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gao SS, Zhang S, Mei ML, Lo EC, Chu CH (2016) Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a systematic review. BMC Oral Health 16(1):12.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0171-6 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lenzi TL, Montagner AF, Soares FZ, de Oliveira Rocha R (2016) Are topical fluorides effective for treating incipient carious lesions?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 147(2):84–91 e81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2015.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marinho VC, Worthington HV, Walsh T, Chong LY (2015) Fluoride gels for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6):CD002280.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002280.pub2
  9. 9.
    Lussi A, Hellwig E, Klimek J (2012) Fluorides - mode of action and recommendations for use. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 122(11):1030–1042Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fisher J, Johnston S, Hewson N, van Dijk W, Reich E, Eisele JL, Bourgeois D (2012) FDI Global Caries Initiative; implementing a paradigm shift in dental practice and the global policy context. Int Dent J 62(4):169–174.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2012.00128.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brunton PA, Davies RP, Burke JL, Smith A, Aggeli A, Brookes SJ, Kirkham J (2013) Treatment of early caries lesions using biomimetic self-assembling peptides - a clinical safety trial. Br Dent J 215(4):E6.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.741 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pleil AM, Coyne KS, Reese PR, Jumadilova Z, Rovner ES, Kelleher CJ (2005) The validation of patient-rated global assessments of treatment benefit, satisfaction, and willingness to continue--the BSW. Value Health 8(Suppl 1):S25–S34.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00069.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alkilzy M, Tarabaih A, Santamaria RM, Splieth CH (2018) Self-assembling peptide P11-4 and fluoride for regenerating enamel. J Dent Res 97(2):148–154.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517730531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aggeli A, Bell M, Boden N, Carrick LM, Strong AE (2003) Self-assembling peptide polyelectrolyte beta-sheet complexes form nematic hydrogels. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 42(45):5603–5606.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200352207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aggeli A, Bell M, Boden N, Keen JN, Knowles PF, McLeish TC, Pitkeathly M, Radford SE (1997) Responsive gels formed by the spontaneous self-assembly of peptides into polymeric beta-sheet tapes. Nature 386(6622):259–262.  https://doi.org/10.1038/386259a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davies RPW, Aggeli A, Beevers AJ, Boden N, Carrick L, Fishwick CWG, McLeish TCB, Nyrkova I et al (2006) Self-assembling β-sheet tape forming peptides. Supramol Chem 18(5):435–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kirkham J, Firth A, Vernals D, Boden N, Robinson C, Shore RC, Brookes SJ, Aggeli A (2007) Self-assembling peptide scaffolds promote enamel remineralization. J Dent Res 86(5):426–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kyle S, Aggeli A, Ingham E, McPherson MJ (2010) Recombinant self-assembling peptides as biomaterials for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31(36):9395–9405.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.051 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kind L, Stevanovic S, Wuttig S, Wimberger S, Hofer J, Muller B, Pieles U (2017) Biomimetic remineralization of carious lesions by self-assembling peptide. J Dent Res 96(7):790–797.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517698419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schmidlin P, Zobrist K, Attin T, Wegehaupt F (2016) In vitro re-hardening of artificial enamel caries lesions using enamel matrix proteins or self-assembling peptides. J Appl Oral Sci 24(1):31–36.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150352 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Takahashi F, Kurokawa H, Shibasaki S, Kawamoto R, Murayama R, Miyazaki M (2016) Ultrasonic assessment of the effects of self-assembling peptide scaffolds on preventing enamel demineralization. Acta Odontol Scand 74(2):142–147.  https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2015.1066850 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Silvertown JD, Wong BPY, Sivagurunathan KS, Abrams SH, Kirkham J, Amaechi BT (2017) Remineralization of natural early caries lesions in vitro by P11 -4 monitored with photothermal radiometry and luminescence. J Investig Clin Dent 8(4).  https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12257
  23. 23.
    Jablonski-Momeni A, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M (2014) Efficacy of the self-assembling peptide P11-4 in constructing a remineralization scaffold on artificially-induced enamel lesions on smooth surfaces. J Orofac Orthop 75(3):175–190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-014-0211-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vieira AP, Lawrence HP, Limeback H, Sampaio FC, Grynpas M (2005) A visual analog scale for measuring dental fluorosis severity. J Am Dent Assoc 136(7):895–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Benson EP, Shah AA, Wilmott RD (2005) Measurement of white lesions surrounding orthodontic brackets: captured slides vs digital camera images. The Angle Orthodontist 75(2):226–230Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Willmot DR, Benson PE, Pender N, Brook AH (2000) Reproducibility of quantitative measurement of white enamel demineralisation by image analysis. Caries Res 34(2):175–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chaffee BW, Cheng J, Featherstone JD (2015) Non-operative anti-caries agents and dental caries increment among adults at high caries risk: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Oral Health 15(1):111.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0097-4 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Logan S, Sheiham A (2002) Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD002279.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002279
  29. 29.
    Memarpour M, Dadaein S, Fakhraei E, Vossoughi M (2016) Comparison of oral health education and fluoride varnish to prevent early childhood caries: a randomized clinical trial. Caries Res 50(5):433–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Agouropoulos A, Twetman S, Pandis N, Kavvadia K, Papagiannoulis L (2014) Caries-preventive effectiveness of fluoride varnish as adjunct to oral health promotion and supervised tooth brushing in preschool children: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Dent 42(10):1277–1283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ramos-Gomez FJ, Gansky SA, Featherstone JD, Jue B, Gonzalez-Beristain R, Santo W, Martinez E, Weintraub JA (2012) Mother and youth access (MAYA) maternal chlorhexidine, counselling and paediatric fluoride varnish randomized clinical trial to prevent early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent 22(3):169–179.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01188.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Anderson M, Dahllof G, Twetman S, Jansson L, Bergenlid AC, Grindefjord M (2016) Effectiveness of early preventive intervention with semiannual fluoride varnish application in toddlers living in high-risk areas: a stratified cluster-randomized controlled trial. Caries Res 50(1):17–23.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000442675 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Slade GD, Bailie RS, Roberts-Thomson K, Leach AJ, Raye I, Endean C, Simmons B, Morris P (2011) Effect of health promotion and fluoride varnish on dental caries among Australian Aboriginal children: results from a community-randomized controlled trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 39(1):29–43.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00561.x CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V (2005) The Nyvad criteria for assessment of caries lesion activity. In: Dentistry IUSo, Stookey GK (eds) 7th Indiana Conference 2005, Indianapolis, IN. Clinical Models Workshop : remin-demin, precavitation, caries. Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, pp 99–116Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Banerjee A, Frencken JE, Schwendicke F, Innes NPT (2017) Contemporary operative caries management: consensus recommendations on minimally invasive caries removal. Br Dent J 223(3):215–222.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Splieth CH, Flessa S (2008) Modelling lifelong costs of caries with and without fluoride use. Eur J Oral Sci 116(2):164–169.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00524.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Private Practice for PeriodontologyAachenGermany
  2. 2.credentis agWindischSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Operative and Preventive DentistryUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  4. 4.MH Statistical ConsultingMarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations