Deproteinized bovine bone derived with collagen improves soft and bone tissue outcomes in flapless immediate implant approach and immediate provisionalization: a randomized clinical trial
- 19 Downloads
This study aimed at evaluating soft and hard tissue dimensions after immediate implant placement and immediate temporization with or without alveolar preservation at the maxillary anterior region.
Materials and methods
Twenty-two patients needing maxillary incisor extraction and with the possibility of immediate implant placement were randomly assigned to the following groups: test (n = 11): immediate implant placement + deproteinized bovine bone derived with collagen inserted into the alveolus or control (n = 11): immediate implant placement without biomaterial. All soft tissue measurements were evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after implant therapy. Cone beam tomography was performed at baseline and at 6 months after implant placement to evaluate hard tissue dimension.
The test group presented higher height of soft tissue at mesiobuccal and distobuccal sites at 3 months and 6 months when compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Regarding the bone tissue, the test group showed higher buccolingual ridge dimension at 6 months when compared to the control group (p < 0.05).
It can be concluded that the use of deproteinized bovine bone derived with collagen together with immediate dental implants results in better soft and bone tissue outcomes than immediate implants alone.
The use of deproteinized bovine bone derived with collagen may enhance the results regarding soft and bone tissue in combination with immediate implant and temporization.
KeywordsBiomaterial Extraction socket Grafting Healing Immediate implant Tomographic evaluation
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the local ethical committee of Paulista University (56342516.8.0000.5512).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Willings M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV (2008) Different loading strategies of dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials. Eur J Oral Implantol 1:259–276Google Scholar
- 3.Phillips K, Kois JC (1998) Aesthetic peri-implant site development. The restorative connection. Dent Clin N Am 42:57–70Google Scholar
- 4.Barone A, Toti P, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Derchi G, Covani U (2014) Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 85:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2013.120711 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Stoupel J, Lee CT, Glick J, Sanz-Miralles E, Chiuzan C, Papapanou PN (2016) Immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the aesthetic zone using a flapless or a flap-involving approach: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol 43:1171–1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L (2015) Soft tissue contour changes at immediate postextraction single-tooth implants with immediate restoration: a 12-month prospective cohort study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 35:191–198. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Roccuzzo M, Gaudioso L, Bunino M, Dalmasso P (2014) Long-term stability of soft tissues following alveolar ridge preservation: 10-year results of a prospective study around non submerged implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 34:795–804. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Alkan EA, Parlar A, Yildirim B, Senguven B (2013) Histological comparison of healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using enamel matrix derivatives versus Bio-Oss Collagen: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:1522–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Pontes AE, Ribeiro FS, da Silva VC, Margonar R, Piattelli A, Cirelli JA, Marcantonio E Jr (2008) Clinical and radiographic changes around dental implants inserted in different levels in relation to the crestal bone, under different restoration protocols, in the dog model. J Periodontol 79:486–494. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Seibert JS (1993) Treatment of moderate localized alveolar ridge defects. Preventive and reconstructive concepts in therapy. Dent Clin N Am 37:265–280Google Scholar
- 24.Wilson TG, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran D (1998) Implants placed in immediate extraction sites: a report of histologic and histometric analyses of human biopsies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13:333–341Google Scholar
- 26.Akimoto K, Becker W, Persson R, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O’Neal RB (1999) Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: a study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:351–360Google Scholar
- 28.Caudill RF, Meffert RM (1991) Histologic analysis of the osseointegration of endosseous implants in simulated extraction sockets with and without e-PTFE barriers. 1. Preliminary findings. Int J Periodontics Restorative, vol 11. Dent, pp 207–215Google Scholar
- 29.Hasturk H, Kantarci A, Ghattas M, Dangaria SJ, Abdallah R, Morgan EF, Diekwisch TG, Ashman A, Van Dyke T (2014) The use of light/chemically hardened polymethylmethacrylate, polyhydroxylethylmethacrylate, and calcium hydroxide graft material in combination with polyanhydride around implants and extraction sockets in minipigs: part II: histologic and micro-CT evaluations. J Periodontol 85:1230–1239. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.120424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Assaf JH, Zanatta FB, de Brito RB Jr, França FM (2013) Computed tomographic evaluation of alterations of the buccolingual width of the alveolar ridge after immediate implant placement associated with the use of a synthetic bone substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:757–763. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2719 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Caneva M, Botticelli D, Morelli F, Cesaretti G, Beolchini M, Lang NP (2012) Alveolar process preservation at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine bone mineral—an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:789–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02332.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Clementini M, Tiravia L, De Risi V, Vittorini Orgeas G, Mannocci A, de Sanctis M (2015) Dimensional changes after immediate implant placement with or without simultaneous regenerative procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 42:666–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Araújo M, Linder E, Wennström J, Lindhe J (2008) The influence of bio-Oss collagen on healing of an extraction socket: an experimental study in the dog. Int J periodontics restorative, vol 28. Dent, pp 123–135Google Scholar
- 38.Tsoukaki M, Kalpidis CD, Sakellari D, Tsalikis L, Mikrogiorgis G, Konstantinidis A (2013) Clinical, radiographic, microbiological, and immunological outcomes of flapped vs. flapless dental implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 24:969–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02503.x Google Scholar
- 40.Delgado-Ruiz R, Romanos GE, Alexandre Gerhke S, Gomez-Moreno G, Maté-Sánchez de Val JE, Calvo-Guirado JL (2016) Biological effects of compressive forces exerted on particulate bone grafts during socket preservation: animal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 29:792–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12942 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Romanos GE, Delgado-Ruiz RA, Gómez-Moreno G, López-López PJ, Mate Sanchez de Val JE, Calvo-Guirado JL (2018) Role of mechanical compression on bone regeneration around a particulate bone graft material: an experimental study in rabbit calvaria. Clin Oral Implants Res 29(6):612-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12592
- 44.Knox R, Caudill R, Meffert R (1991) Histologic evaluation of dental endosseous implants placed in surgically created extraction defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 11:364–375Google Scholar
- 46.Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Araki M, Kawashima S, Terakado M (2003) A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95:371–437. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar