Efficacy of Endo-Ice followed by intrapulpal ice application as an adjunct to inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis—a randomized controlled trial
- 65 Downloads
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of Endo-Ice followed by intrapulpal ice application for reducing pain during pulp extirpation in mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
Materials and methods
Sixty patients diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis participated in the present study. Subjects were randomly allocated to any one of the following groups: control group—inferior alveolar nerve block with lignocaine (2%) adrenaline (1:80000), articaine group—inferior alveolar nerve block with lignocaine (2%) adrenaline (1:80000) + Buccal infiltration with articaine (4%) with adrenaline (1:100000); or cold group—inferior alveolar nerve block with lignocaine (2%) adrenaline (1:80000) + cold application. The outcome assessor measured the level of pain during access opening and pulp extirpation using the visual analogue scale. The anxiety level of the patient was also measured.
During access opening, there was a significant difference in the pain reduction in the articaine group when compared to cold and control group (p value = 0.02). During pulp extirpation, cold group and articaine group showed a significant reduction in pain levels as compared to the control group (p value = 0.001). There was no difference in the pain level during pulp extirpation among the two test arms (articaine and cold) (p value = 0.99). Further, cold significantly reduced the level of anxiety when compared to the articaine or control group (p value = 0.001).
Hence, cold is a simple, supplementary technique in reducing pain during pulp extirpation.
Application of cold may help in minimizing the fear of additional injection in managing pain during endodontic treatment.
KeywordsArticaine Endo-Ice Ice stick Syptomatic irreversible pulpitis
The work was supported by the Department of Conservative dentistry and Endodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Maduravoyal, Chennai 95.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Matthews R, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M (2009) Articaine for supplemental buccal mandibular infiltration anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis when the inferior alveolar nerve block fails. J Endod 35:343–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.025 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Mellor AC, Dorman ML, Girdler NM (2005) The use of an intra-oral injection of ketorolac in the treatment of irreversible pulpitis. Int Endod J 38:789–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01015_1.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Singla M, Subbiya A, Aggarwal V, Vivekanandhan P, Yadav S, Venkatesh H, Geethapriya N, Sharma V (2015) Comparison of the anaesthetic efficacy of different volumes of 4% articaine (1.8 and 3.6 mL) as supplemental buccal infiltration after failed inferior alveolar nerve block. Int Endod J 48:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12283 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Akhlaghi NM, Hormozi B, Abbott PV, Khalilak Z (2016) Efficacy of ketorolac buccal infiltrations and inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial. J Endod 42:691–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.02.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.De Pedro-Muñoz A, Mena-Álvarez J (2017) The effect of preoperative submucosal administration of tramadol on the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve block on mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Int Endod J 50:1134–1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12755 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Shetty KP, Satish SV, Kilaru KR, Sardar P, Luke AM (2015) Comparison of anesthetic efficacy between lidocaine with and without magnesium sulfate USP 50% for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 41:431–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Stentz D, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Fowler S, Beck M (2018) Effect of a combination of intranasal ketorolac and nitrous oxide on the success of the inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Endod 44:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.09.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Nusstein J, Claffey E, Reader A, Beck M, Weaver J (2005) Anesthetic effectiveness of the supplemental intraligamentary injection, administered with computer controlled local anesthetic delivery system, in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 31:354–358. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000140565.88940.60 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Aggarwal V, Jain A, Kabi D (2009) Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations of articaine and lidocaine after an inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 35:925–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Ashraf H, Kazem M, Dianat O, Noghrehkar F (2013) Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in block and infiltration anesthesia administered in teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Endod 39:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Poorni S, Veniashok B, Senthilkumar AD, Indira R, Ramachandran S (2011) Anesthetic efficacy of four percent articaine for pulpal anesthesia by using inferior alveolar nerve block and buccal infiltration techniques in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Endod 37:1603–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Shapiro MR, McDonald NJ, Gardner RJ, Peters MC, Botero TM (2018) Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in supplemental infiltration for mandibular first versus second molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. J Endod 44:523–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.10.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Cook O, Nusstein J, Drum M, Fowler S, Reader A, Draper J (2018) Anesthetic efficacy of a combination of 4% prilocaine/2% lidocaine with epinephrine for the inferior alveolar nerve block: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Endod 44:683–688.Article In Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Majstorovic M, Veerkamp JS (2004) Relationship between needle phobia and dental anxiety. J Dent Child (Chic) 71:201–205Google Scholar
- 27.Hargreaves KM (2001) Neurochemical factors in injury and inflammation in orofacial tissues. In: Lavigne G, Lund J, Sessle B, Dubner R (eds) Orofacial pain: basic sciences to clinical management. Quintessence Publications, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 28.Suda H, Ikeda H (2002) The circulation of the pulp. In: Hargreaves K, Goodis H (eds) Seltzer and Bender’s Dental Pulp. Quintessence Publications, ChicagoGoogle Scholar