Advertisement

Outcomes after up-front surgery and metronomic neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 or UFT for early tongue squamous cell carcinoma

  • Shinichiro Kina
  • Toshiyuki Nakasone
  • Takao Kinjo
  • Fumikazu Nimura
  • Nao Sunagawa
  • Akira Arasaki
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Our aim was to investigate the disease-free survival in patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma receiving metronomic neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil prodrugs (UFT or S-1) plus bleomycin compared with those who had up-front surgery retrospectively.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 108 patients with stages I to II tongue squamous cell carcinoma who had undergone surgery were divided into the “surgery group” or “neoadjuvant chemotherapy group.”

Results

A total of 41 patients received up-front surgery; 67 received metronomic neoadjuvant chemotherapy with UFT plus bleomycin (39) or S-1 plus bleomycin (28). The rate of disease-free survival was the primary outcome measure. Neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil prodrugs did not correlate higher with improved disease-free survival than up-front surgery (72 and 54%, respectively; hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 1.03; P = 0.06). Patients who received S-1 were more likely than those who received UFT to have pathological complete response (46% vs. 15%; P = 0.007). Neoadjuvant S-1 significantly improved disease-free survival as compared with up-front surgery (79% vs. 54%; hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.98; P = 0.04). However, neoadjuvant UFT did not improve disease-free survival as compared with up-front surgery (67% vs. 54%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.33; P = 0.24).

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant S-1 chemotherapy, as compared with up-front surgery, significantly improved disease-free survival among patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Clinical relevance

A choice of drugs before neoadjuvant metronomic chemotherapy is needed.

Keywords

Metronomic S-1 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Tongue squamous cell carcinoma 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethics committee at the University of the Ryukyus (No. 772), and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

We treated the patients at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and all patients provided written informed consent.

References

  1. 1.
    De Felice F, Musio D, Tombolini V (2015) Head and neck cancer: metronomic chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 15:677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kina S, Nakasone T, Kinjo T, Maruyama T, Kawano T, Arasaki A (2016) Impact of metronomic neoadjuvant chemotherapy on early tongue cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 78:833–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    André N, Carré M, Pasquier E (2014) Metronomics: towards personalized chemotherapy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11:413–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Patil VM, Noronha V, Joshi A, Muddu VK, Dhumal S, Bhosale B et al (2015) A prospective randomized phase II study comparing metronomic chemotherapy with chemotherapy (single agent cisplatin), in patients with metastatic, relapsed or inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. Oral Oncol 51(3):279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adjei AA (1999) A review of the pharmacology and clinical activity of new chemotherapy agents for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Br J Clin Pharmacol 48(3):265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miura K, Kinouchi M, Ishida K, Fujibuchi W, Naitoh T, Ogawa H et al (2010) 5-Fu metabolism in cancer and orally-administrable 5-fu drugs. Cancers (Basel) 2(3):1717–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Takechi T, Fujioka A, Matsushima E, Fukushima M (2002) Enhancement of the antitumour activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by inhibiting dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity (DPD) using 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP) in human tumour cells. Eur J Cancer 38(9):1271–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nishimura G, Yanoma S, Mizuno H, Satake K, Taguchi T, Ikeda Y et al (2000) Therapeutic effect of 1 M tegafur-0.4 M 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypridine-1 M potassium oxonate (S-1) on head and neck squamous carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett 159:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang SF, Kang CJ, Lin CY, Fan KH, Yen TC, Wang HM, Chen IH, Liao CT, Cheng AJ, Chang JTC (2008) Neck treatment of patients with early stage oral tongue cancer: Comparison between observation, supraomohyoid dissection, and extended dissection. Cancer 112(5):1066–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fletcher AM, Heaford AC, Trask DK (2008) Detection of metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using the relative expression of tissue-specific mir-205. Transl Oncol 1(4):202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sasaki M, Aoki T, Karakida K, Otsuru M, Takahashi M, Akamatsu T, Sakamoto H, Ota Y (2011) Postoperative follow-up strategy in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(6):e105–e111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kawashiri S, Noguchi N, Tanaka A, Nakaya H, Kato K, Yamamoto E (2009) Inhibitory effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma in a mouse model. Oral Oncol 45(9):794–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsukahara K, Kubota A, Hasegawa Y, Takemura H, Terada T, Taguchi T et al (2015) Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 after curative treatment in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (ACTS-HNC). PLoS One 10:e0116965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Atula TS, Varpula MJ, Kurki TJ, Klemi PJ, Grénman R (1997) Assessment of cervical lymph node status in head and neck cancer patients: palpation, computed tomography and low field magnetic resonance imaging compared with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology. Eur J Radiol 25:152–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Msaouel P, Lam AP, Gundabolu K, Chrysofakis G, Yu Y, Mantzaris I et al (2014) Abnormal platelet count is an independent predictor of mortality in the elderly and is influenced by ethnicity. Haematologica 99(5):930–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weiner DE, Tighiouart H, Amin MG, Stark PC, MacLeod B, Griffith JL et al (2004) Chronic kidney disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a pooled analysis of community-based studies. J Am Soc Nephrol 15(5):1307–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim HC, Nam CM, Jee SH, Han KH, Oh DK, Suh I (2004) Normal serum aminotransferase concentration and risk of mortality from liver diseases: prospective cohort study. BMJ 328(7446):983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsukuda M, Miyake H (2000) Maintenance chemotherapy with UFT for head and neck carcinoma. Oncology 14:93–95Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lam P, Yuen AP, Ho CM, Ho WK, Wei WI (2001) Prospective randomized study of post-operative chemotherapy with levamisole and UFT for head and neck carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:750–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kerbel RS, Kamen BA (2004) The anti-angiogenic basis of metronomic chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 4:423–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scharovsky OG, Mainetti LE, Rozados VR (2009) Metronomic chemotherapy: changing the paradigm that more is better. Curr Oncol 16:7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grégoire V, Beauduin M, Humblet Y, Hamoir M, Longueville J, Majois F et al (1991) A phase I-II trial of induction chemotherapy with carboplatin and fluorouracil in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a report from the UCL-Oncology Group, Belgium. J Clin Oncol 9:1385–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ferdous T, Harada K, Kin T, Harada T, Ueyama Y (2013) Efficacy of schedule-dependent metronomic S-1 chemotherapy in human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Int J Oncol 43:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rusthoven K, Ballonoff A, Raben D, Chen C (2008) Poor prognosis in patients with stage I and II oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 112:345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murthy V, Agarwal JP, Laskar SG, Gupta T, Budrukkar A, Pai P et al (2010) Analysis of prognostic factors in 1180 patients with oral cavity primary cancer treated with definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy. J Cancer Res Ther 6:282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kotwall C, Sako K, Razack MS, Rao U, Bakamjian V, Shedd DP (1987) Metastatic patterns in squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. Am J Surg 154:439–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wong SY, Hynes RO (2006) Lymphatic or hematogenous dissemination: how does a metastatic tumor cell decide? Cell Cycle 5(8):812–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sano D, Myers JN (2007) Metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Cancer Metastasis Rev 26:645–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, Remenar E, Kawecki A, Rottey S et al (2008) Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 359:1116–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hsieh MY, Chen G, Chang DC, Chien SY, Chen MK (2018) The impact of metronomic adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced oral cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 25(7):2091–2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Functional Rehabilitation, Graduate School of MedicineUniversity of the RyukyusNishiharaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Molecular Pharmacology and OncologyGunma UniversityMaebashiJapan
  3. 3.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryUniversity Hospital of the RyukyusNishiharaJapan
  4. 4.Division of Morphological Pathology, Department of Basic Laboratory Sciences, School of Health SciencesUniversity of the RyukyusNishiharaJapan
  5. 5.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryOkinawa Red Cross HospitalNahaJapan

Personalised recommendations