Overaugmentation to compensate for postextraction ridge atrophy using a putty-type porcine bone substitute material with recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2: 4 weeks of healing in a canine model
- 84 Downloads
The aims of the present study were (i) to determine the short-term effects of putty-type porcine bone substitute material (PB) with recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) for alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) and (ii) evaluate the early healing of labial overaugmentation.
Materials and methods
Two groups were randomly assigned to the extraction sockets in mandibular incisors of eight dogs: labial overaugmentation with (i) PB (control) or (ii) rhBMP-2-loaded PB (BMP). Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), and histologic and histomorphometric analyses were performed after 4 weeks.
Micro-CT revealed that some of the overaugmented PB was dispersed in both groups. The new bone volume was significantly larger in the BMP group than in the control group (18.4 ± 3.3 vs. 15.5 ± 3.0 mm3, mean ± SD, P < 0.05). Labial bone resorption was generally found histologically. No signs of mineralization were observed in the overaugmented area despite significantly increased ridge width, as compared to the adjacent tooth area. The area of new bone formation was larger in the BMP group than in the control group overall (23.7 ± 18.8 vs. 18.3 ± 21.2 mm2) and in three parts (apical, middle, and coronal), although the difference was statistically significant only in the coronal part (7.7 ± 7.9 vs. 4.6 ± 6.4 mm2, P < 0.05).
The addition of rhBMP-2 enhanced ossification in the coronal part of the extraction socket relative to using PB alone. Overaugmentation increased the ridge dimension with no evidence of ossification in situ at 4 weeks.
In early healing following ARP, rhBMP-2 enhances bone formation within the socket, but ossification in the overaugmented area needs to be studied further.
KeywordsAnimal model Bone regeneration Ridge preservation rhBMP-2
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) (No. NRF-2017R1A2B2002537).
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures for the animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Yonsei Medical Center, Seoul, Korea (IACUC Approval No. 2013-0317-4).
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
The present study does not require informed consent.
- 3.Mardas N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, MacBeth N, Petrie A, Donos N (2015) Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: group 4: therapeutic concepts & methods. Clin Oral Implants Res 26(Suppl 11):180–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12639 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, Scheetz JP (2003) Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 74:990–999. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Fiorellini JP, Howell TH, Cochran D, Malmquist J, Lilly LC, Spagnoli D, Toljanic J, Jones A, Nevins M (2005) Randomized study evaluating recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for extraction socket augmentation. J Periodontol 76:605–613. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.4.605 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kim YJ, Lee JY, Kim JE, Park JC, Shin SW, Cho KS (2014) Ridge preservation using demineralized bone matrix gel with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72:1281–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.01.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Jung UW, Lee JS, Lee G, Lee IK, Hwang JW, Kim MS, Choi SH, Chai JK (2013) Role of collagen membrane in lateral onlay grafting with bovine hydroxyapatite incorporated with collagen matrix in dogs. J Periodontal Implant Sci 43:64–71. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2013.43.2.64 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 24.Caneva M, Botticelli D, Pantani F, Baffone GM, Rangel IG Jr, Lang NP (2012) Deproteinized bovine bone mineral in marginal defects at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:106–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02202.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Delgado-Ruiz R, Romanos GE, Alexandre Gerhke S, Gomez-Moreno G, Mate-Sanchez de Val JE, Calvo-Guirado JL (2016) Biological effects of compressive forces exerted on particulate bone grafts during socket preservation: animal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 29:792–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12942 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Kim JJ, Schwarz F, Song HY, Choi Y, Kang KR, Koo KT (2016) Ridge preservation of extraction sockets with chronic pathology using Bio-Oss(R) Collagen with or without collagen membrane: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 28:727–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12870 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Calvo-Guirado JL, Boquete-Castro A, Negri B, Delgado Ruiz R, Gomez-Moreno G, Iezzi G (2014) Crestal bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. A pilot study in Foxhound dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 25:344–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12110 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar