Advertisement

Influence of foraminal enlargement on the healing of periapical lesions in rat molars

  • Paula Maciel Brandão
  • José Antonio Poli de Figueiredo
  • Renata Dornelles MorgentalEmail author
  • Roberta Kochenborger Scarparo
  • Rafael Chies Hartmann
  • Silvana Beltrami Gonçalves Waltrick
  • Ronaldo Araújo Souza
Original Article
  • 130 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of foraminal enlargement on the healing of induced apical periodontitis in a rat model.

Material and methods

Periapical lesions were bilaterally induced in mandibular first molars of 24 Wistar rats, through root canals exposure to the oral environment during 3 weeks. Endodontic treatment was performed in the mesial canal of right molars, which were separated into two experimental groups (n = 12/group). The foraminal enlargement group (FEG) received instrumentation in the entire root canal length, including the cemental canal, while in the non-foraminal enlargement group (NFEG), instrumentation was carried out 1 mm short of the apical foramen. Root canals were filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, in the same visit, 1 mm short of the apical foramen in both experimental groups. Left molars were not treated and served as a baseline control group. The animals were killed after 4 weeks, and their hemi-mandibles were prepared for radiographic and histological analysis. Data were analyzed by Student’s t test and ANOVA.

Results

Only FEG presented lower areas of periapical radiolucency compared to the control (p < .05). Both FEG and NFEG allowed decreased inflammation intensity (p < .0001 and p < .01) and higher scores of cementum neoformation when compared to non-treated samples (p < .0001). FEG was more effective than NFEG in promoting biological seal, i.e., apical closure with cementum (p < .01). FEG, but not NFEG, showed lower scores of root resorption than the control.

Conclusions

Foraminal enlargement during root canal preparation improved periapical healing in rat molars.

Clinical significance

Foraminal enlargement has been suggested to improve disinfection at the apical portion of root canals. This procedure may favor the healing of chronic periapical lesions.

Keywords

Endodontics Periapical diseases Root canal preparation Tooth apex 

Notes

Funding

The work was supported by the Graduate Program in Dentistry, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Ricucci D (1998) Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 1. Literature review. Int Endod J 31:384–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ricucci D, Langeland K (1998) Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study. Int Endod J 31:394–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Souza RA (2006) The importance of apical patency and cleaning of the apical foramen on root canal preparation. Braz Dent J 17:6–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ricucci D, Russo J, Rutberg M, Burleson JA, Spangberg LS (2011) A prospective cohort study of endodontic treatments of 1,369 root canals: results after 5 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 112:825–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K (1990) Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 16:498–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchanan LS (1989) Management of the curved root canal. J Calif Dent Assoc 17:18–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flanders DH (2002) Endodontic patency. How to get it. How to keep it. Why it is so important. N Y State Dent J 68:30–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mickel AK, Chogle S, Liddle J, Huffaker K, Jones JJ (2007) The role of apical size determination and enlargement in the reduction of intracanal bacteria. J Endod 33:21–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K (2011) A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J 44:583–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K (2011) A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of non-surgical root canal treatment: part 2: tooth survival. Int Endod J 44:610–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silva EJ, Menaged K, Ajuz N, Monteiro MR, Coutinho-Filho Tde S (2013) Postoperative pain after foraminal enlargement in anterior teeth with necrosis and apical periodontitis: a prospective and randomized clinical trial. J Endod 39:173–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saini HR, Sangwan P, Sangwan A (2016) Pain following foraminal enlargement in mandibular molars with necrosis and apical periodontitis - a randomized controlled trial. Int Endod J 49:1116–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Erausquin J, Muruzabal M (1967) A method for root canal treatment in the molar of the rat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 24:540–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tagger M, Massler M (1975) Periapical tissue reactions after pulp exposure in rat molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 39:304–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sato EFL, Antoniazzi JH (1993) A new method for endodontic treatment in molars of rats. Braz Dent J 4:73–77Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu L, Wang L, Wu Y, Peng B (2014) The expression of MCP-1 and CCR2 in induced rats periapical lesions. Arch Oral Biol 59:492–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Borlina SC, de Souza V, Holland R, Murata SS, Gomes-Filho JE, Dezan Junior E, Marion JJ, Neto DA (2010) Influence of apical foramen widening and sealer on the healing of chronic periapical lesions induced in dogs’ teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:932–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hernandez SZ, Negro VB, Maresca BM (2001) Morphologic features of the root canal system of the maxillary fourth premolar and the mandibular first molar in dogs. J Vet Dent 18:9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scarparo RK, Dondoni L, Bottcher DE, Grecca FS, Rockenbach MI, Batista EL Jr (2011) Response to intracanal medication in immature teeth with pulp necrosis: an experimental model in rat molars. J Endod 37:1069–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stashenko P, Wang CY, Tani-Ishii N, Yu SM (1994) Pathogenesis of induced rat periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 78:494–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mahl CR, Fontanella V (2008) Evaluation by digital subtraction radiography of induced changes in the bone density of the female rat mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:438–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gomes MS, Barletta FB, Della Bona A, Vanni JR, Pereira CC, Figueiredo JAP (2007) Microbial leakage and apical inflammatory response in dog’s teeth after root canal filling with different sealers, post space preparation and exposure to the oral environment. J Appl Oral Sci 15:429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holland R, Otoboni Filho JA, de Souza V, Nery MJ, Bernabe PF, Dezan E Jr (2003) A comparison of one versus two appointment endodontic therapy in dogs’ teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 29:121–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Butler NP (1970) Apical debridement--a hypothesis and preliminary report. J Br Endod Soc 4:52–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr (2010) Biofilms and apical periodontitis: study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopathologic findings. J Endod 36:1277–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Borges Silva EA, Guimarães LS, Küchler EC, Antunes LAA, Antunes LS (2017) Evaluation of effect of foraminal enlargement of necrotic teeth on postoperative symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 43:1969–1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nair PN (2006) On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. Int Endod J 39:249–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pothukuchi K (2006) Case assessment and treatment planning: what governs your decision to treat, refer or replace a tooth that potentially requires endodontic treatment? Aust Endod J 32:79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Noiri Y, Ehara A, Kawahara T, Takemura N, Ebisu S (2002) Participation of bacterial biofilms in refractory and chronic periapical periodontitis. J Endod 28:679–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Subramanian K, Mickel AK (2009) Molecular analysis of persistent periradicular lesions and root ends reveals a diverse microbial profile. J Endod 35:950–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Holland R, Sant’Anna Junior A, Souza V, Dezan Junior E, Otoboni Filho JA, Bernabe PF, Nery MJ, Murata SS (2005) Influence of apical patency and filling material on healing process of dogs’ teeth with vital pulp after root canal therapy. Braz Dent J 16:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Masson E, Hennet PR, Calas PL (1992) Apical root canal anatomy in the dog. Endod Dent Traumatol 8:109–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Souza Filho FJ, Benatti O, de Almeida OP (1987) Influence of the enlargement of the apical foramen in periapical repair of contaminated teeth of dog. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 64:480–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018
corrected publication 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula Maciel Brandão
    • 1
  • José Antonio Poli de Figueiredo
    • 2
  • Renata Dornelles Morgental
    • 3
    Email author
  • Roberta Kochenborger Scarparo
    • 4
  • Rafael Chies Hartmann
    • 2
  • Silvana Beltrami Gonçalves Waltrick
    • 2
  • Ronaldo Araújo Souza
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EndodonticsBahia School of Medicine and Public HealthSalvadorBrazil
  2. 2.Clinical Department, School of DentistryPontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Stomatology, School of DentistryFederal University of Santa MariaSanta MariaBrazil
  4. 4.Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of DentistryFederal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations