Abstract
Objective
This study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials in order to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success rates of primary teeth pulpotomy performed with biodentine, when compared to MTA.
Methods
Search strategies were conducted in nine databases on August 5th, 2017, update on February 14th, 2018. Clinical articles were selected, which were in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria and the research objective. They were analyzed by meta-analysis at three time points (6, 12, and 18 months).
Results
Out of the 233 publications initially identified, only 9 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the review. The 6-month overall clinical (RR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.96–1.02, p = 0.92) and radiographic success rates (RR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.92–1.00, p = 0.28) showed that biodentine vs. MTA did not differ statistically. The 12 and 18-month overall clinical success rates, respectively (RR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.97–1.04, p = 0.77; RR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.92–1.05, p = 0.74) and radiographic success rates, respectively (RR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.92–1.02, p = 0.11; RR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.91–1.10, p = 0.56) also showed that biodentine vs. MTA did not differ statistically.
Conclusion
There is no superiority of one material over the other, MTA versus biodentine.
Clinical relevance
This systematic review comparing the performance of biodentine in relation to the MTA when used in the pulpotomy technique in primary teeth. Although MTA is considered the gold standard material for pulpotomy procedures, it has some drawbacks (poor handling, staining potential, long setting time); thus, it is important to evaluate the clinical performance of other calcium silicate-based cements like biodentine that overcome this drawbacks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
lheozor-Ejiofor Z, Worthington HV, Walsh T et al (2015) Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD010856. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010856.pub2
Gimenez T, Bispo BA, Souza DP, Viganó ME, Wanderley MT, Mendes FM, Bönecker M, Braga MM (2016) Does the decline in caries prevalence of Latin American and Caribbean children continue in the new century? Evidence from systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One 11:e0164903
Kassebaum NJ, Smith AGC, Bernabé E, Fleming TD, Reynolds AE, Vos T, Murray CJL, Marcenes W, GBD 2015 Oral Health Collaborators, Abyu GY, Alsharif U, Asayesh H, Benzian H, Dandona L, Dandona R, Kasaeian A, Khader YS, Khang YH, Kokubo Y, Kotsakis GA, Lalloo R, Misganaw A, Montero P, Nourzadeh M, Pinho C, Qorbani M, Blancas MJR, Sawhney M, Steiner C, Traebert J, Tyrovolas S, Ukwaja KN, Vollset SE, Yonemoto N (2017) Global, regional, and national prevalence, incidence, and disability-adjusted life years for oral conditions for 195 countries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. J Dent Res 96:380–387
Smaïl-Faugeron V, Courson F, Durieux P et al Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6(8):CD003220. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003220.pub2
Ng FK, Messer LB (2008) Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy medicament: an evidence-based assessment. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 9:58–73
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (2016) Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent tooth. Clinical Guidelines – Reference Manual 2016-2017. Pediatr Dent 38:280–288
Simancas-Pallares MA, Díaz-Caballero AJ, Luna-Ricardo LM (2010) Mineral troxide aggregate in primary teeth pulpotomy. A systematic literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 15:942–946
Anthonappa RP, King NM, Martens LC (2013) Is there sufficient evidence to support the long-term efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) for endodontic therapy in primary teeth. Int Endod J 46:198–204
Lin PY, Chen HS, Wang YH, Tu YK (2014) Primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Dent 42:1060–1077
Asgary S, Shirvani A, Fazlyab M (2014) MTA and ferric sulfate in pulpotomy outcomes of primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pediatr Dent 39:1–8
Shirvani A, Asgary S (2014) Mineral trioxide aggregate versus formocresol pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Clin Oral Invest 18(4):1023–1030
Stringhini Junior E, Vitcel ME, Oliveira LB (2015) Evidence of pulpotomy in primary teeth comparing MTA, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulphate, ans electrosurgery with formocresol. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 16:303–312
Coll JA, Seale NS, Vargas K, Marghalani AA, Shamali SA, Graham L (2017) Primary tooth vial pulp therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Dent 39(1):16–27
Marciano MA, Duarte MA, Camilleri J (2015) Dental discoloration caused by bismuth oxide in MTA in the presence of sodium hypochlorite. Clin Oral Invest 19(9):2201–2209
Ramos JC, Palma PJ, Nascimento R, Caramelo F, Messias A, Vinagre A, Santos JM (2016) 1-year in vitro evaluation of tooth discoloration induced by 2 calcium silicate-based cements. J Endod 42(9):1403–1407
Marconyak LJ Jr, Kirkpatrick TC, Roberts HW, et al. (2016) A comparison of coronal tooth discoloration elicited by various endodontic reparative materials. J Endod 42:470–473
Xavier SR, Pilownic KJ, Gastmann AH, Echeverria MS, Romano AR, Geraldo Pappen F (2017). Bovine tooth discoloration induced by endodontic filling materials for primary teeth. Int J Dent 2017:7401962, 1, 5
Możyńska J, Metlerski M, Lipski M, Nowicka A. Tooth discoloration induced by different calcium silicate-based cements: a systematic review of in vitro studies
Raju VG, Venumbaka NR, Mungara J, Vijayakumar P, Rajendran S, Elangovan A (2014) Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. J Ind Soc Pedod Prev Dent 32:304–310
El-Khodary HM, Farsi DJ, Farsi NM, Zidan AZ (2015) Sealing ability of four calcium containing cements used for repairing furcal perforations in primary molars: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 16:733–739
Shayegan A, Jurysta C, Atash R, Petein M, Abbeele AV (2012) Biodentine used as a pulp-capping agent in primary pig teeth. Pediatr Dent 34:e-202-208
Fouad WA, Yossef R (2013) Clinical and radiographic assessment of vital pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate and a novel bioactive cement. EDJ 59:1–7
Kusum B, Rakesh K, Richa K (2015) Clinical and radiographical evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine and propolis as pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth. Rest Dent Endon 40:276–285
Niranjani K, Prasad MG, Vasa AAK, et al. (2015) Clinical evaluation of success of primary teeth pulpotomy using mineral trioxide aggregate®, laser and BiodentineTM – an in vivo study. J Clin Diagn Res 9:ZC35-ZC37
Cuadros-Fernández C, Al LR et al (2016) Short-term treatment outcome of pulpotomies in pimary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 20:1639–1645
Togaru H, Muppa R, Srinivas N, Naveen K, Reddy VK, Rebecca VC (2016) Clinical and radiographic evaluation of success of two commercially available pulpotomy agents in primary teeth: an in vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract 17:557–563
Bani M, Aktaş N, Çınar Ç, Odabaş ME (2017) The clinical and radiographic success of primary molar pulpotomy using biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate: a 24-month randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Dent 39:284–288
Carti O, Oznurhan F (2017) Evaluation and comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine in primary tooth pulpotomy: clinical and radiographic study. Nig J Clin Pract 20:1604–1609
Juneja P, Kulkarni S (2017) Clinical and radiographic comparison of biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulpotomy agents in primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 18:271–278
Rajasekharan S, Martens L, Vandenbulcke J et al (2017) Efficacy of three different pulpotomy agents in primary molars – a randomized control trial. Int Endod J 50:215–228
Higgins JPT, Green S (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org
Vallés M, Roig M, Duran-Sindreu F, Martínez S, Mercadé M (2015) Color stability of teeth restored with biodentine: a 6-month in vitro study. J Endod 41(7):1157–1160
Rajasekharan S, Martens LC, Cauwels RP, Anthonappa RP (2018) Biodentine TM material characteristics and clinical applications: a 3 year literature review and update. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 19:1–22
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent: For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stringhini Junior, E., dos Santos, M.G.C., Oliveira, L.B. et al. MTA and biodentine for primary teeth pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Clin Oral Invest 23, 1967–1976 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2616-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2616-6