Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 22, Issue 8, pp 2957–2958 | Cite as

Letter to the Editor about the article published in Clinical Oral Investigations tilted “Impacted and transmigrated mandibular canines: an analysis of 3D radiographic imaging data” (Bertl MH, Frey C, Bertl K, Giannis K, Gahleitner A, Strbac GD (2018), Clin Oral Investig, doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2342-0)

  • Paweł PlakwiczEmail author
  • Krzysztof Kukuła
Letter to the Editor

Dear Editor,

We would like to congratulate the authors of the article on a well-designed and meticulously executed study which investigates impacted and transmigrated mandibular canines. The paper’s material constitutes a large group of canines with the use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to detect both pathological findings of the impacted canines and the influence of impacted teeth on their adjacent teeth and other anatomical structures. The results and conclusions are in most cases adequately presented; however, one explanation is missing for a single but clinically relevant issue. The authors analyze root resorption of adjacent teeth, which is caused by impacted canines, with an outstanding precision regarding diagnostic tools and interpretation. The results of the study support the previous findings published by Mazinis et al. [1] and many other studies which evaluated the impact of impacted canines on the adjacent teeth.

Contrary to the above, the process of resorption...


  1. 1.
    Mazinis E, Zafeiriadis A, Karathanasis A, Lambrianidis T (2012) Transmigration of impacted canines: prevalence, management and implications on tooth structure and pulp vitality of adjacent teeth. Clin Oral Investig 16(2):625–632. Epub 2011 Mar 30CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ducommun F, Bornstein MM, Bosshardt D, Katsaros C, Dula K (2018) Diagnosis of tooth ankylosis using panoramic views, cone beam computed tomography, and histological data: a retrospective observational case series study. Eur J Orthod, 2018 May 25;40(3):231–238. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heithersay GS (1999) Clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic features of invasive cervical resorption. Quintessence Int 30:27–37PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Patel S, Foschi F, Mannocci F, Patel K (2018) External cervical resorption: a three-dimensional classification. Int Endod J 51(2):206–214. Epub 2017 Sep 13 ReviewCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mavridou AM, Pyka G, Kerckhofs G, Wevers M, Bergmans L, Gunst V, Huybrechts B, Schepers E, Hauben E, Lambrechts P (2016) A novel multimodular methodology to investigate external cervical tooth resorption. Int Endod J 49:287–300. Epub 2015 Apr 16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PeriodontologyMedical University of WarsawWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Department of Oral SurgeryMedical University of WarsawWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations