Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 1595–1604 | Cite as

Guided bone regeneration to reduce root migration after coronectomy of lower third molar: a randomized clinical trial

  • Yiu Yan LEUNGEmail author
Original Article
  • 152 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Root migration occurs after most third molar coronectomy and a portion may be exposed in the oral cavity. This study compared the root migration rate, surgical morbidities after third molar coronectomy with or without adjunctive guided bone regeneration (GBR).

Methods

A split-mouth randomized clinical trial was conducted on patients with bilateral lower third molars close to the inferior alveolar nerve. One side of the lower third molars was randomized to receive coronectomy with adjunctive GBR (study group) and the other side received coronectomy alone (control group). The cases were followed up for 2 years. Root migration, root exposure rate, surgical morbidities, and adjacent second molar periodontal regeneration were analyzed.

Results

Forty-eight subjects (19 males, 29 females) with a mean age of 2.6 years (SD 5.8 years) were recruited. There was no root exposure in the review period. There were no statistical differences in pain and infection rate between the two groups at all time-points. The root migration was significantly less in the study group than the control group from 3 months onwards, and migrated only 1 mm (SD 1.3 mm) in 2 years (versus 3.5 mm (S.D.1.9 mm) in the control group). There were no differences in the periodontal attachment regeneration between the two groups.

Conclusions

Root migration in coronectomy with adjunctive GBR was less when compared with coronectomy alone, and with similar surgical morbidities and periodontal regeneration of adjacent second molars.

Clinical relevance

Minimal root migration occurred in coronectomy with adjunctive GBR. The chance of long-term (3 years or more) root exposure and the need of subsequent second operation to remove the exposed root would be reduced.

Keywords

Coronectomy Guided bone regeneration Third molar surgery Randomized clinical trial 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Ms. Natalie Wong and Dr. Karen Cheung for their help in this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding information

This project was funded by the Early Career Scheme of the Research Grnats Council, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (Grant code: HKU 788913M).

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was granted by the local Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong and Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (IRB No. UW12-451).

Informed consent

Informed consent of the study was obtained from the recruited patients.

References

  1. 1.
    Garaas R, Moss KL, Fisher EL, Wilson G, Offenbacher S, Beck JD, White RP Jr (2011) Prevalence of visible third molars with caries experience or periodontal pathology in middle-aged and older Americans. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Queral-Godoy E, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C (2005) Incidence and evolution of inferior alveolar nerve lesions following lower third molar extraction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 99:259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leung YY, Cheung LK (2011) Risk factors of neurosensory deficits in lower third molar surgery: an literature review of prospective studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leung YY, McGrath C, Cheung LK (2013) Trigeminal neurosensory deficit and patient reported outcome measures: the effect on quality of life. PLoS One 29(8):e77391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leung YY, Cheung LK (2009) Safety of coronectomy versus excision of wisdom teeth: a randomized controlled trial. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108:821–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Renton T, Hankins M, Sproate C, McGurk M (2005) A randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve as a result of coronectomy and removal of mandibular third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O'Riordan BC (2004) Coronectomy (intentional partial odontectomy of lower third molars). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 98:274–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karapataki S, Hugoson A, Kugelberg CF (2000) Healing following GTR treatment of bone defects distal to mandibular 2nd molars after surgical removal of impacted 3rd molars. J Clin Periodontol 27:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karapataki S, Hugoson A, Falk H, Laurell L, Kugelberg CF (2000) Healing following GTR treatment of intrabony defects distal to mandibular 2nd molars using resorbable and non-resorbable barriers. J Clin Periodontol 27:333–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leung YY (2016) Coronectomy of lower third molars with and without guided bony regeneration: a pilot study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:155–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials 11:32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leung YY, Cheung LK (2011) Correlation of radiographic signs, inferior dental nerve exposure and deficit in wisdom tooth surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:1873–1879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leung YY, Cheung KY. (2018) Root migration pattern after third molar coronectomy: a long-term analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg pii: S0901–5027(18)30033-X, 47, 802, 808Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knutsson K, Lysell L, Rohlin M (1989) Postoperative status after partial removal of the mandibular third molar. Swed Dent J 13:15–22Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leung YY, Cheung LK (2012) Coronectomy of the lower third molar is safe within the first 3 years. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:1515–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leung YY, Cheung LK (2016) Long-term morbidities of coronectomy on lower third molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 121:5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yeung AWK, Wong NSM, Bornstein MM, Leung YY. (2018) Three-Dimensional Radiographic Evaluation of Root Migration Patterns 4–8.5 Years After Lower Third Molar Coronectomy: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. In press Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garcia-Garcia A (2006) Is coronectomy really preferable to extraction? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Freedman GL (1997) Intentional partial odontectomy: review of cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:524–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pogrel MA, Lee JS, Muff DF (2004) Coronectomy: a technique to protect the inferior alveolar nerve. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:1447–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dolanmaz D, Yildirim G, Isik K, Kucuk K, Ozturk A (2009) A preferable technique for protecting the inferior alveolar nerve: Coronectomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:1234–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goto S, Kurita K, Kuroiwa Y, Hatano Y, Kohara K, Izumi M, Ariji E (2012) Clinical and dental computed tomographic evaluation 1 year after coronectomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:1023–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Horváth A, Mardas N, Mezzomo LA, Needleman IG, Donos N (2013) Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 17:341–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Needleman IG, Worthington HV, Giedrys-Leeper E, Tucker RJ (2006) Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 19:CD001724Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karapataki S, Hugoson A, Kugelberg CF (2000) Healing following GTR treatment of bone defects distal to mandibular 2nd molars after surgical removal of impacted 3rd molars. J Clin Periodontol 27:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kugelberg CF, Ahlström U, Ericson S, Hugoson A, Kvint S (1991) Periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery in adolescents and adults. A Prospective Study Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 20:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kugelberg CF, Ahlström U, Ericson S, Hugoson A, Thilander H (1991) The influence of anatomical, pathophysiological and other factors on periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery. A multiple regression analysis. J Clin Periodontol 18:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leizerovitz M, Leizerovitz O (2013) Modified and grafted coronectomy: a new technique and a case report with two-year followup. Case Rep Dent 2013:914173Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leizerovitz M, Leizerovitz O (2013) Reduced complications by modified and grafted coronectomy vs. standard coronectomy--a case series. Alpha Omegan 106:81–89Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of DentistryThe University of Hong KongPok Fu LamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations