Does enamel matrix derivative application improve clinical outcomes after semilunar flap surgery? A randomized clinical trial
- 78 Downloads
To evaluate the treatment of gingival recessions by semilunar coronally positioned flap plus enamel matrix derivative (SCPF + EMD).
Materials and methods
Thirty patients with class I localized gingival recession were included. They were randomly allocated in two groups: SCPF + EMD and SCPF. Recession height (RH), recession width (RW), width of keratinized tissue (WKT), thickness of keratinized tissue (TKT), probing depth (PD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Patient/professional evaluation of esthetics and root sensitivity was performed.
After 12 months, mean root coverage was 1.98 ± 0.33 mm for SCPF + EMD (90.86 ± 14.69%) and 1.85 ± 0.41 mm (79.76 ± 17.44%) for SCPF (p > 0.05). The esthetic evaluation by the patient showed preference for SCPF + EMD. According to the professional evaluation (QCE), the use of EMD decreases the appearance of postoperative scar tissue line. There was a significant reduction in root hypersensitivity with no further complaints by the patients.
The addition of EMD provides significantly better esthetics to SCPF, according to patient and professional assessments. SCPF + EMD is effective but not superior to SCPF for root coverage, after 12 months.
Previous clinical trials showed that the combination of EMD with coronally advanced flaps may enhance the outcome of root coverage. There is a lack of studies testing the combination of EMD with SCPF. The combination SCPF + EMD provides better esthetics when compared to the SCPF and is effective, but not superior, to SCPF for root coverage, after 12 months.
Trial registration: NCT02459704
KeywordsDental enamel proteins Gingival recession/therapy Esthetics Tooth root/surgery, surgical flap
The authors appreciate the financial support (masters scholarship) provided by the Research Funding Agency from São Paulo State (FAPESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil (process #2013/13098-9).
Compliance with the ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 6.Thompson BK, Meyer R, Singh GB, Mitchell W (2000) Densitization of exposed of root surfaces using a semilunar coronally positioned flap. Gen Dent 48(1):68–71Google Scholar
- 7.Casati MZ, Nociti FH Jr, Sallum EA, Nogueira GR, Sallum AW (2001) Tratamento de recessões gengivaispela técnica de retalho semilunar posicionado coronariamente. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent 55(3):169–172Google Scholar
- 9.de Campos GV, Bittencourt S, Sallum AW, Nociti Júnior FH, Sallum EA, Casati MZ (2006) Achieving primary closure and enhancing aesthetics with periodontal microsurgery. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 18(7):449–454Google Scholar
- 19.Schiff T, Dotson M, Cohen S, DeVizio W, Volpe A (1994) Efficacy of a dentifrice containing potassium nitrate, soluble pyrophosphate, PVM/MA copolymer, and sodium fluoride on dentinal hypersensitivity: a twelve week clinical study. J Clin Dent 5(Sp Is):87–92Google Scholar
- 21.Santamaria MP, Queiroz LA, Mathias IF, Neves FL, Silveira CA, Bresciani E, Jardini MA, Sallum EA (2016) Resin composite plus connective tissue graft to treat single maxillary gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesion: randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 43(5):461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Rebele SF, Zuhr O, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hürzeler M (2014) Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions. J Clin Periodontol 41(6):593–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar