Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 873–877 | Cite as

Validity of Chronic Oral Mucosal Diseases Questionnaire in oral submucous fibrosis

  • Kaustubh SansareEmail author
  • Ruchika Kapoor
  • Freny Karjodkar
Original Article
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

To validate the use of Chronic Oral Mucosal Diseases Questionnaire in oral submucous fibrosis.

Materials and methods

Hundred consecutive oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) patients were requested to respond to Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and complete the Oral Health Impact Profile 14 (OHIP 14) and COMDQ. Spearman’s rho correlation was used to assess the relationship between VAS and COMDQ score and COMDQ and OHIP 14 score. The reliability of the instrument was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha analysis. Discriminant analysis was used to assess if COMDQ significantly differentiated between OSF population with and without any prior treatment done as well as OSF with mouth opening less than and more than or equal to 25 mm.

Results

The Spearman’s correlation coefficient showed a high significance between the different domains of COMDQ and OHIP 14 and COMDQ and VAS. This study demonstrated a good convergent validity between the overall COMDQ and OHIP 14 scores (0.88).The overall Cronbach’s alpha value was found to be 0.75 indicating an acceptable internal consistency reliability of COMDQ. The tool was unable to differentiate between patients with mouth opening between less than and more than or equal to 25 mm and patients with and without prior treatment.

Conclusion

These results provide evidence that COMDQ can be used for OSF patients.

Clinical relevance

COMDQ could be used as a valid and reliable tool for further clinical OSF research.

Keywords

Quality of life Oral submucous fibrosis Chronic Oral Mucosal Disease Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale Oral Health Impact Profile 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the local institutional review board (EC-54/DOMR-25ND/2017) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Ni Riordain R, McCreary C (2009) Further reliability and responsiveness of the Chronic Oral Mucosal Diseases Questionnaire. Oral Dis 18:60–66.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01844.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kerr AR, Warnakulasuriya S, Mighell AJ, Dietrich T, Nasser M, Rimal J, Jalil A, Bornstein MM, Nagao T, Fortune F, Hazarey VH, Reichart PA, Silverman S, Johnson NW (2011) A systematic review of medical interventions for oral submucous fibrosis and future research opportunities. Oral Dis 17:42–57.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01791.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Canniff JP, Harvey W (1981) The aetiology of oral submucous fibrosis: the stimulation of collagen synthesis by extracts of areca nut. Int J Oral Surg 10:163–167Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harvey W, Scutt A, Meghji S, Canniff JP (1986) Stimulation of human buccal mucosa fibroblasts in vitro by betel-nut alkaloids. Arch Oral Biol 31:45–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(86)90112-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maher R, Lee AJ, Warnakulasuriya KA, Lewis JA, Johnson NW (1994) Role of areca nut in the causation of oral submucous fibrosis: a case-control study in Pakistan. J Oral Pathol Med 23:65–69.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1994.tb00258.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Locker D, Clarke M, Payne B (2000) Self-perceived oral health status, psychological well-being, and life satisfaction in an older adult population. J Dent Res 79:970–975.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790041301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Locker D, Allen PF (2002) Developing short-form measures of oral health-related quality of life. J Public Health Dent 62:13–20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2002.tb03415.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Allen F, Locker D (2002) A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults. Int J Prosthodont 15:446–450Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slade GD, Spencer AJ (1994) Development and evaluation of the oral health impact profile. Community Dent Health 11:3–11Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ni Riordain R, Meaney S, McCreary C (2011) A patient centered approach to developing a quality-of-life questionnaire for chronic oral mucosal diseases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod 111:578–586.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    NHS ENGLAND NHS. Patient centred outcome measures. 2015. High quality care for all, now and for future generations. Available at: http://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/pe/pcoms/ (accessed on 10 November, 2017)
  12. 13.
    Li M, He S-L (2012) Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Chronic Oral Mucosal Diseases Questionnaire. J Oral Pathol Med 42:194–199.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.16000714.2012.01157.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 15.
    Riordain RN, Hodgson T, Porter S, Fedele S (2016) Validity and reliability of the Chronic Oral Mucosal Diseases Questionnaire in a UK population. J Oral Pathol Med 45:613–616.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 16.
    Namrata M, Jayanth Kumar V (2017) Assessment of quality of life in patients with chronic oral mucosal diseases: a questionnaire-based study. Int J Orofac Biol 1:24–27.  https://doi.org/10.4103/ijofb.ijofb_3_16 Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    Trivedy CR, Craig G, Warnakulasuriya S (2002) The oral health consequences of chewing areca nut. Addict Biol 7:115–125.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13556210120091482 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 18.
    Warnakulasuriya S (2002) Areca nut use following migration and its consequences. Addict Biol 7:127–132.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13556210120091491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 19.
    Changrani J, Gany F (2005) Paan and Gutka in the United States: an emerging threat. J Immigr Health 7:103–108.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-005-2643-2647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 20.
    Ni Riordain R, McCreary C (2011) Validity and reliability of a newly developed quality of life questionnaire for patients with chronic oral mucosal diseases. J Oral Pathol Med 40:604–609.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.2011.01021.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 21.
    Jayasooriya PR, Nadeeka Jayasinghe KA, Mudiyanselage Tilakaratne W (2011) Relationship between thickness of fibrosis and epithelial dysplasia in oral submucous fibrosis. J Investig Clin Dent 2:171–175.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-1626.2011.00055.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 22.
    Hazarey VK, Erlewad DM, Mundhe KA, Uqhade SN (2007) Oral submucous fibrosis: study of 1000 cases from central India. J Oral Pathol Med 36:12–17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.2006.00485.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaustubh Sansare
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ruchika Kapoor
    • 1
  • Freny Karjodkar
    • 1
  1. 1.Nair Hospital Dental CollegeMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations