Efficacy and acceptance of professional dental cleaning among nursing home residents
- 136 Downloads
To determine the impact of general and oral health status of nursing home residents in Germany on efficacy and acceptance of professional dental cleaning performed by a dental nurse.
Materials and methods
Participants (N = 41; mean age 83 ± 8 years) living in a nursing home were included. Personal and general health, oral health, oral hygiene habits, and needs were investigated. Individual acceptance regarding professional dental cleaning via different devices (scaler, interdental brushes, ultrasonic cleaning) was assessed, as was the efficacy of this method using after-cleaning indices.
Oral health among nursing home residents was impaired and independent from dementia status. Most residents (33/41) performed oral hygiene procedures independently and showed better index values than those in need of external help. Residents requiring help with oral hygiene showed increased risk profiles (higher age, more often immobile, demented, more xerostomia). The dental cleaning procedure required a mean time of 37 ± 11 min, was widely accepted (36/41), and achieved clean results (plaque index 0.1 ± 0.5, oral hygiene index 0.2 ± 1.6, Volpe-Manhold index 0.4 ± 1.6); food residues were reduced to 0 independent from cognitive status. Regarding the cleaning methods, scalers were accepted best without difference between demented and non-demented residents.
Professional dental cleaning in nursing homes is an accepted and efficacious oral hygiene procedure among nursing home residents.
Professional dental cleaning is an efficacious and accepted method as a first step in line with strategies to improve oral health and should be considered in nursing home residents.
KeywordsNursing home Oral hygiene Gerodontology Dentistry nursing
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study or their legal guardians.
- 3.Wyatt CC (2002) Elderly Canadians residing in long-term care hospitals: part I. Medical and dental status. J Can Dent Assoc 68:353–358Google Scholar
- 7.Zenthofer A, Schroder J, Cabrera T, Rammelsberg P, Hassel AJ (2014) Comparison of oral health among older people with and without dementia. Community Dent Health 31:27–31Google Scholar
- 11.Vanobbergen JN, De Visschere LM (2005) Factors contributing to the variation in oral hygiene practices and facilities in long-term care institutions for the elderly. Community Dent Health 22:260–265Google Scholar
- 12.Ainamo J, Barmes D, Beagrie G, Cutress T, Martin J, Sardo-Infirri J (1982) Development of the World Health Organization (WHO) community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN). Int Dent J 32:281–291Google Scholar
- 15.Saxer UP, Muhlemann HR (1975) Motivation and education. SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd 85:905–919Google Scholar
- 17.Greene JC (1960) Nutrition in a collegiate basic nursing curriculum. Nurs Outlook 8:314–315Google Scholar
- 23.Janssens B, Vanobbergen J, Lambert M, Schols JM, De Visschere L (2017) Effect of an oral healthcare programme on care staff knowledge and attitude regarding oral health: a non-randomised intervention trial. Clin Oral Investig 22:281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2110-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Zenthofer A, Meyer-Kuhling I, Hufeland AL, Schroder J, Cabrera T, Baumgart D, Rammelsberg P, Hassel AJ (2016b) Carers' education improves oral health of older people suffering from dementia—results of an intervention study. Clin Interv Aging 11:1755–1762. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S118330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar