Comparative evaluation of three obturation techniques in primary incisors using digital intra-oral receptor and C.B.C.T—an in vitro study
- 88 Downloads
Successful pulpectomy in primary teeth depends on quality of obturation. It can be evaluated using digital intra-oral receptor (D.I.O.R) and cone beam computed tomography (C.B.C.T). The purposes of this study were to compare 3 different obturation techniques such as lentulospiral, insulin syringe, and endodontic plugger in primary incisors and to evaluate its quality of obturation using D.I.O.R and C.B.C.T technique.
Materials and methods
Thirty-three extracted primary incisors were biomechanically prepared and obturated with zinc oxide eugenol cement by 3 different obturation techniques. The obturation was evaluated for length of obturation and voids using D.I.O.R and C.B.C.T methods.
There was a statistically significant difference between all the groups in length of obturation (P = 0.02) in both D.I.O.R and C.B.C.T. Significant differences (P = 0.03) were present in number of voids among 3 obturation techniques in C.B.C.T. Statistically more voids were observed with D.I.O.R in lentulospiral (P = 0.04) group and in insulin syringe (P = 0.02) group.
Acceptable result was obtained with lentulospiral in length of obturation compared to insulin syringe and endodontic plugger technique. Insulin syringe technique resulted in increased underfilling with least number of voids. More number of voids were seen in middle one-third and least number of voids were observed at apical one third of the root among all the 3 techniques of obturation. The study concluded that void identification is improved with D.I.O.R compared to C.B.C.T.
Lentulospiral reported effective length of obturation, while insulin syringe with least number of voids. D.I.O.R (2-Dimensional) is efficient in detecting voids compared to C.B.C.T (3-Dimensional) in obturated primary teeth.
KeywordsC.B.C.T Deciduous teeth Digital intra-oral receptor Obturation Pulpectomy
Funding was done by author Akhil Jose.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 2.Mahajan N, Bansal A (2015) Various obturation methods used in deciduous teeth. Int J Med Dent Sci 4:708–713Google Scholar
- 5.Singh A, Gupta N, Agarwal N, Kumar D, Anand A (2017) A comparative volumetric evaluation of four obturating techniques in primary teeth using cone beam computed tomography. Pediatr Dent 39(2):11E–16EGoogle Scholar
- 6.Reddy PVR, Hugar SM, Shigli A, Suganya M, Hugar SS, Kukreja P (2015) Comparative evaluation of efficiency of three obturation techniques for primary incisors—an in-vivo study. Int J Oral Health Med Res 2(2):15–18Google Scholar
- 7.Asokan S, Sooriaprakas C, Raghu V, Bairavi R (2012) Volumetric analysis of root canal filling in primary teeth using spiral computed tomography: an in-vitro study. J Dent Child (Chic) 79(2):46–48Google Scholar
- 9.Gandhi M, Tandon S, Vijay A, Kalia G, Rathore K (2017) Clinical assessment of various obturating techniques for primary teeth: a comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res 11(7):48–51Google Scholar
- 10.Memarpour M, Shahidi S, Meshkl M (2013) Comparison of different obturation techniques for primary molars by digital radiography. Pediatr Dent 35(3):236–240Google Scholar
- 16.Coll JA, Sadrian R (1996) Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent 18:57–63Google Scholar
- 19.Dandashi MB, Nazif MM, Zullo T, Elliott MA, Schneider LG, Czonstkowsky M (1993) An in-vitro comparison of three endodontic techniques for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent 15:254–256Google Scholar
- 25.Møller L, Wenzel A, Wegge-Larsen AM, Ding M, Væth M, Hirsch E, Kirkevang LL (2013) Comparison of images from digital intraoral receptors and cone beam computed tomography scanning for detection of voids in root canal fillings: an in vitro study using micro-computed tomography as validation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 115(6):810–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar