Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 673–680 | Cite as

The effect of intraosseous local anesthesia of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine on pulpal blood flow and pulpal anesthesia of mandibular molars and canines

  • Kadkao Vongsavan
  • Tshering Samdrup
  • Kanittha KijsamanmithEmail author
  • Praphasri Rirattanapong
  • Noppakun Vongsavan
Original Article
  • 145 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of intraosseous (IO) anesthesia with 4% articaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine on pulpal blood flow (PBF) and pulpal anesthesia of mandibular first molars and canines in human subjects.

Materials and methods

Ten healthy volunteers with intact mandibular first molar and canine were given an osteocentral technique of IO injection using the Quick Sleeper 5 system and 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine at distal site of mandibular first molar. The PBF was monitored by a laser Doppler flowmeter (LDF). Pulpal anesthesia was assessed with an electric pulp tester (EPT).

Results

IO injection caused a decrease in PBF in molars from 6.31 ± 3.85 perfusion units (P.U.) before injection to 2.51 ± 2.53 P.U. 1 min after injection (P < 0.001). The percentage reduction in PBF was 60% after 1 min and PBF returned back to the baseline after 45 min. No significant reduction in PBF was observed in the canines (P = 0.212). For pulpal anesthesia in the molars, the mean onset was 2.40 ± 0.84 min and the mean duration was 38 ± 16.19 min. In the canines, there was a decrease in the sensitivity to EPT but complete pulpal anesthesia was not achieved.

Conclusions

IO injection distal to mandibular first molar caused a decrease in PBF and successful pulpal anesthesia in first molar, but not in canine. Both PBF and EPT readings returned to normal, suggesting that pulpal ischemia may not occur.

Clinical relevance

IO anesthesia is safe to use as a primary technique in teeth with normal pulp.

Keywords

4% articaine Intraosseous anesthesia Laser-Doppler flowmetry Mandibular molars Pulpal anesthesia Pulpal blood flow 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University. The authors would like to express gratitude to the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, for their support and assistance.

Funding

For this study, no funding was received.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Meechan JG (2002) Supplementary routes to local anaesthesia. Int Endod J 35(11):885–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tom K, Aps J (2015) Intraosseous anesthesia as a primary technique for local anesthesia in dentistry. Clin Res Infect Dis 2(1):1012Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gréaud PY, Pasquier E, Villette A (2008) Osteocentral anesthesia: a new technique in dental anesthesia. Inform Dent 90:701–704Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sixou JL, Marie-Cousin A (2015) Intraosseous anaesthesia in children with 4% articaine and epinephrine 1:400,000 using computer-assisted systems. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 16(6):477–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Özer S, Yaltirik M, Kirli I, Yargic I (2012) Comparative evaluation of pain and anxiety levels in 2 different anesthesia techniques: locoregional anesthesia using conventional syringe versus intraosseous anesthesia using a computer-controlled system (QuickSleeper). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 114(Suppl 5):S132–S139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nusstein J, Kennedy S, Reader A, Beck M, Weaver J (2003) Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental X-tip intraosseous injection in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 29(11):724–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bigby J, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M, Weaver J (2006) Articaine for supplemental intraosseous anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 32(11):1044–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farhad A, Razavian H, Shafiee M (2018) Effect of intraosseous injection versus inferior alveolar nerve block as primary pulpal anaesthesia of mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Acta Odontol Scand:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2018.1428826
  9. 9.
    Sixou JL, Barbosa-Rogier ME (2008) Efficacy of intraosseous injections of anesthetic in children and adolescents. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106(2):173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zarei M, Ghoddusi J, Sharifi E, Forghani M, Afkhami F, Marouzi P (2012) Comparison of the anaesthetic efficacy of and heart rate changes after periodontal ligament or intraosseous X-Tip injection in mandibular molars: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int Endod J 45(10):921–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bhuyan AC, Latha SS, Jain S, Kataki R (2014) Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental X-tip intraosseous injection using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline in patients with irreversible pulpitis: an in vivo study. J Conserv Dent 17(6):522–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Remmers T, Glickman G, Spears R, He J (2008) The efficacy of IntraFlow intraosseous injection as a primary anaesthesia technique. J Endod 34(3):280–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pereira LAP, de Caśsia Bergamaschi C, Cama Ramacciato J, Ranamli J (2013) Articaine (4%) with epinephrine (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) in intraosseous injections in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molars: anesthetic efficacy and cardiovascular effects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 116(2):e85–e91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beneito-Brotons R, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Ata-Ali J, Peñarrocha M (2012) Intraosseous anesthesia with solution injection controlled by a computerized system versus conventional oral anesthesia: a preliminary study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 17:e426–e429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D (2000) Efficacy of articaine: a new amide local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc 131:635–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coggins R, Reader A, Nist R, Beck M, Meyers WJ (1996) Anesthetic efficacy of the intraosseous injection in maxillary and mandibular teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 81(6):634–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dunbar D, Reader A, Nist R, Beck M, Meyer WJ (1996) Anesthetic efficacy of the intraosseous injection after an inferior alveolar nerve block. J Endod 22(9):481–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim S (1990) Neurovascular interactions in the dental pulp in health and inflammation. J Endod 16(2):48–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Olgart L, Edwall L, Gazelius B (1991) Involvement of afferent nerves in pulpal blood flow reactions in response to clinical and experimental procedures in the cat. Arch Oral Biol 36(8):575–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grund P, Raab WHM (1992) Change in pulpal microcirculation and pain perception following local anaesthesia (Abstract). Int Endod J 29:35Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pitt Ford TR, Seare M, McDonald F (1993) Action of adrenaline on the effect of dental local anaesthetic solutions. Endod Dent Traumatol 9(1):31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Premdas CE, Pitt Ford TR (1995) Effect of palatal injections on pulpal blood flow in premolars. Endod Dent Traumatol 11(6):274–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chng HS, Pitt Ford TR, McDonald F (1996) Effects of Prilocaine local anaesthetic solutions on pulpal blood flow in maxillary canines. Endod Dental Traumatol 12(2):89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Odor TM, Pitt Ford TR, McDonald F (1994) Adrenaline in local anaesthesia: the effect of concentration on dental pulpal circulation and anaesthesia. Endod Dent Traumatol 10(4):167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Odor TM, Pitt Ford TR, McDonald F (1994) Effect of inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia on the lower teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 10(3):144–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sukapattee M, Wanachantararak S, Sirimaharaj V, Vongsavan N, Matthews B (2016) Effect of full crown preparation on pulpal blood flow in man. Arch Oral Biol 70:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim S (1986) Ligamental injection: a physiological explanation of its efficacy. J Endod 12(10):486–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R (1997) Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 24(11):808–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kijsamanmith K, Timpawat S, Vongsavan N, Matthews B (2011) Pulpal blood flow recorded from human premolar teeth with a laser Doppler flow meter using either red or infrared light. Arch Oral Biol 56(7):629–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hargreaves KM, Keiser K (2002) Local anesthetic failure in endodontics: mechanisms and management. Endod Top 1:26–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Malamed SF (2013) Handbook of local anaesthesia, 6th edn. Mosby, St LouisGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dreven L, Reader A, Beck M, Meyers WJ, Weaver J (1987) An evaluation of an electric pulp tester as a measure of analgesia in human vital teeth. J Endod 13(5):233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nydegger B, Nusstein J, Reader A, Drum M, Beck M (2014) Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study. J Endod 40(12):1912–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Denio D, Torabinejad M, Bakland LK (1992) Anatomical relationship of the mandibular canal to its surrounding structures in mature mandibles. J Endod 18(4):161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Collins SL, Moore A, McQuay HJ (1997) The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain 72:95–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Susi L, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M, Weaver J, Drum M (2008) Heart rate effects of intraosseous injections using slow and fast rates of anesthetic solution deposition. Anesth Prog 55(1):9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of DentistryMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of DentistryMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations