Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 511–517 | Cite as

Microleakage of composite crowns luted on CAD/CAM-milled human molars: a new method for standardized in vitro tests

  • Maximiliane Amelie SchlenzEmail author
  • Alexander Schmidt
  • Peter Rehmann
  • Thomas Niem
  • Bernd Wöstmann
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate debonding of full crowns made of CAD/CAM composites, CAD/CAM technology was applied to manufacture standardized test abutments to increase the reproducibility of human teeth used in in vitro studies.

Materials and methods

A virtual test abutment and the corresponding virtual crown were designed and two STL data sets were generated. Sixty-four human third molars and CAD/CAM blocks were milled using a CNC machine. Crowns of four different composite blocks (Lava Ultimate (LU), Brilliant Crios (BC), Cerasmart (CS), Experimental (EX)) were adhesively bonded with their corresponding luting system (LU: Scotchbond Universal/RelyX Ultimate; BC: One Coat 7 Universal/DuoCem; CS: G-PremioBond/G-Cem LinkForce; EX: Experimental-Bond/Experimental-Luting-Cement). Half of the specimens were chemical-cured (CC) and the others were light-cured (LC). Afterwards, specimens were artificially aged in a chewing simulator (WL-tec, 1 million cycles, 50–500 N, 2 Hz, 37 °C). Finally, a dye penetration test was used to detect debonding. For inspection, the specimens were sliced, and penetration depth was measured with a digital microscope. Data were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

No cases of total debonding were observed after cyclic loading. However, the LC specimens showed a significantly lower amount of leakage than the CC ones (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the CC specimens exhibited broad scattering. Only the LC-EX blocks showed no debonding. The CC-CS blocks showed the highest leakage and scattering of all tested specimens.

Conclusions

Natural human teeth can be manufactured by CAD/CAM technology in highly standardized test abutments for in vitro testing. For CAD/CAM composites, light curing should be performed.

Clinical relevance

The success of a restoration depends on the long-term sealing ability of the luting materials, which avoids debonding along with microleakage. For CAD/CAM composites, separate light curing of the adhesive and luting composite is highly recommended.

Keywords

CAD/CAM Debonding Composite Microleakage Adhesive cementation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the dental companies Coltene and Dental Milestones Guaranteed (DMG) for the donation of their materials for the study. In addition, we are thankful for the support of the dental technicians, Marc Richter and Ulf Neveling, for the extraordinary value for designing the STL data sets. Furthermore, we gratefully acknowledge the support of our biostatistician, Dr. Johannes Herrmann, for the statistical analysis.

Funding

The work was supported by the Department of Prosthodontics, Justus-Liebig-University in Giessen, Germany.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, Iwasaki N, Asakawa Y, Oki M, Finger WJ, Arksornnukit M (2014) Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J 33(5):705–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li RW, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP (2014) Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: state of the art. J Prosthodont Res 58(4):208–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ (2014) Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 93(12):1232–1234.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514553976 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, Dewael TY, Sadoun MJ (2016) From artisanal to CAD-CAM blocks: state of the art of indirect composites. J Dent Res 95(5):487–495.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516634286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Awada A, Nathanson D (2015) Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 114(4):587–593.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krejci I, Daher R (2017) Stress distribution difference between Lava Ultimate full crowns and IPS e.max CAD full crowns on a natural tooth and on tooth-shaped implant abutments. Odontology 105(2):254–256.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0276-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kidd EA (1976) Microleakage: a review. J Dent 4(5):199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M (2008) Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dent Mater 24(2):185–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lührs AK, Pongprueksa P, De Munck J, Geurtsen W, Van Meerbeek B (2014) Curing mode affects bond strength of adhesively luted composite CAD/CAM restorations to dentin. Dent Mater 30(3):281–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.11.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M, Kramer N, Reich S, Braun A, Roggendorf M (2015) Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 18(1):9–20Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nobuaki A, Keiichi Y, Takashi S (2015) Effects of air abrasion with alumina or glass beads on surface characteristics of CAD/CAM composite materials and the bond strength of resin cements. J Appl Oral Sci 23(6):629–636  https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kassem AS, Atta O, El-Mowafy O (2012) Fatigue resistance and microleakage of CAD/CAM ceramic and composite molar crowns. J Prosthodont 21(1):28–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosentritt M, Plein T, Kolbeck C, Behr M, Handel G (2000) In vitro fracture force and marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns fixed on natural and artificial teeth. Int J Prosthodont 13(5):387–391Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Preis V, Hahnel S, Behr M, Bein L, Rosentritt M (2017) In-vitro fatigue and fracture testing of CAD/CAM-materials in implant-supported molar crowns. Dent Mater 33(4):427–433.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosentritt M, Hahnel S, Engelhardt F, Behr M, Preis V (2017) In vitro performance and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated implant supported molar crowns. Clin Oral Investig 21(4):1213–1219.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2057-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shetty M, Rajalakshmi S, Krishna Prasad D (2014) Comparison of marginal gap and microleakage in copy-milled and cad-milled zirconia copings bonded using light cure and chemical cure resin bonding systems. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14(Suppl 1):37–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-014-0359-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yildirim G, Uzun IH, Keles A (2017) Evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of hybrid and nanoceramic systems with microcomputed tomography: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 118(2):200–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ISO (2003) ISO/TS 11405:2003(E), Dental materials—testing of adhesion to tooth structureGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nawafleh N, Hatamleh MM, Ochsner A, Mack F (2018) The impact of core/veneer thickness ratio and cyclic loading on fracture resistance of lithium disilicate crown. J Prosthodont 27(1):75–82.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kelly JR (1999) Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 81(6):652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang Y, Sailer I, Lawn BR (2013) Fatigue of dental ceramics. J Dent 41(12):1135–1147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johnson AC, Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Ahuja S (2014) Fracture strength of CAD/CAM composite and composite-ceramic occlusal veneers. J Prosthodont Res 58(2):107–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pashley DH (1990) Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endod 16(2):70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kassem AS, Atta O, El-Mowafy O (2011) Combined effects of thermocycling and load-cycling on microleakage of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture molar crowns. Int J Prosthodont 24(4):376–378Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marshall GW Jr, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M (1997) The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent 25(6):441–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Blatz MB, Oppes S, Chiche G, Holst S, Sadan A (2008) Influence of cementation technique on fracture strength and leakage of alumina all-ceramic crowns after cyclic loading. Quintessence Int 39(1):23–32Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stawarczyk B, Awad D, Ilie N (2016) Blue-light transmittance of esthetic monolithic CAD/CAM materials with respect to their composition, thickness, and curing conditions. Oper Dent 41(5):531–540.  https://doi.org/10.2341/15-252-L CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV (2017) Light transmission of novel CAD/CAM materials and their influence on the degree of conversion of a dual-curing resin cement. J Adhes Dent 19(1):39–48.  https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a37722 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    De Souza G, Braga RR, Cesar PF, Lopes GC (2015) Correlation between clinical performance and degree of conversion of resin cements: a literature review. J Appl Oral Sci 23(4):358–368.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Arrais CA, Rueggeberg FA, Waller JL, de Goes MF, Giannini M (2008) Effect of curing mode on the polymerization characteristics of dual-cured resin cement systems. J Dent 36(6):418–426.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cassina G, Fischer J, Rohr N (2016) Correlation between flexural and indirect tensile strength of resin composite cements. Head Face Med 12(1):29.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-016-0128-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    van Noort R (2007) Introduction to dental materials. Mosby, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dejak B, Mlotkowski A, Langot C (2012) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of molars with thin-walled prosthetic crowns made of various materials. Dent Mater 28(4):433–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nakamura T, Imanishi A, Kashima H, Ohyama T, Ishigaki S (2001) Stress analysis of metal-free polymer crowns using the three-dimensional finite element method. Int J Prosthodont 14(5):401–405Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alexander Schmidt
    • 1
  • Peter Rehmann
    • 1
  • Thomas Niem
    • 1
  • Bernd Wöstmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Dental Clinic - Department of ProsthodonticsJustus-Liebig-UniversityGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations