Comparison of light propagation in dental tissues and nano-filled resin-based composite
- 177 Downloads
This study used three LASERs (red, green, and blue) with a spectrophotometer to compare the light propagation for the following: absorption (A), transmittance (T), attenuation (K), and scattering anisotropy coefficient (g) in dental tissues and nano-filled resin-based composites. This study used three distinct incremental build-up techniques, which included one shade (body), two shades (enamel and dentin), and three shades (enamel, transparent, and dentin).
Twenty human, un-erupted, recently extracted third molars (shade B1) were used to obtain 40 tooth slabs. The samples were randomized and equally distributed into four experimental groups. The Positive Control Group included dental tissues with enamel, dento-enamel junction DEJ, and dentin; the Technique 1 group (T1) included one shade tissues, B1B; the Technique 2 group (T2) included two-shades tissues, A2Dentin and B1Enamel; and the Technique 3 group (T3) included three shade tissues, A2Dentin, Transparent, and B1Enamel. Cavity preparation was standardized, and, using the spectrophotometer, each specimen was irradiated by three LASERs. A voltmeter recorded the light-output signal, and from this raw data, the following optical constants (A, T, K, g) were calculated.
ANOVA, followed by a post hoc Tukey’s test (p < 0.05), revealed that absorption and transmittance in dental tissues were significantly different when comparing the three build-up technique groups. However, when examining attenuation coefficient, there was no significant difference in dental tissues for T2 and T3 as analyzed by blue and red lasers. There was also no significant difference among the three lasers for T2 and T3. There was also no significant effect of the types of experiments on the value of scattering anisotropy factor g for blue laser among the four experimental groups.
Within the limitations of this study, none of the build-up techniques were able to reproduce the dental tissues optical properties, and T2 and T3 resulted in a similar pattern of light propagation.
The clinical success of restorative procedures depends on selecting materials and techniques that emulate the natural tooth and provide long-term stability in color and optical properties.
KeywordsLight propagation Biomaterials Nano-filled composite Dental tissues
The work was supported by the Project Pool from ADEA (American Dental Education Association).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Author Hanan Elgendy declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Rodrigo Rocha Maia declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Fredrick Skiff declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Gerald Denehy declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Fang Qian declares that she has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 1.Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM (2012) Craig’s restorative dental materials, 13th edition. Br Dent J 213(2):90–90Google Scholar
- 2.Paravina RD (2004) Esthetic color training in dentistry. Elsevier Mosby, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 6.Grajower R, Wozniak WT, Lindsay JM (1982) Optical properties of composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 9(5):389–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1982.tb01027.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Fernandez-Oliveras A, Rubiño M, Perez MM (2012) Scattering anisotropy measurements in dental tissues and biomaterials. Journal of the European Optical Society - Rapid publications, Europe, v. 7, May. 2012. ISSN 1990-2573Google Scholar
- 14.Watts DC, Cash AJ (1994) Analysis of optical transmittance by 400–500nm visible light into aesthetic dental biomaterials. J Dent 22(112):7Google Scholar
- 15.Vanini L (1996) Light and color in anterior composite restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 8(7):673–682Google Scholar
- 16.de Araujo Junior EM, Baratieri LN, Monteiro Junior S, Vieira LC et al (2003) Direct adhesive restoration of anterior teeth: part 3. Procedural considerations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 15(6):433–437 quiz 438Google Scholar
- 17.Fahl N, Denehy GE, Jackson RD (1995) Protocol for predictable restoration of anterior teeth with composite resins. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 7(8):13–21 quiz 22Google Scholar
- 18.Dietschi D, Ardu S, Krejci I (2006) A new shading concept based on natural tooth color applied to direct composite restorations. Quintessence Int 37(2):91–102Google Scholar
- 20.Vanini L (2012) Moving beyond classical shade guides to achieve natural restorations. Dental TribuneGoogle Scholar
- 27.Spitzer D, Bosch JT (1975) The absorption and scattering of light in bovine and human dental enamel. Springer Verlag 17:129–137Google Scholar