Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 423–433 | Cite as

Comparison of light propagation in dental tissues and nano-filled resin-based composite

  • Hanan Elgendy
  • Rodrigo Rocha Maia
  • Fredrick Skiff
  • Gerald Denehy
  • Fang Qian
Original Article
  • 177 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

This study used three LASERs (red, green, and blue) with a spectrophotometer to compare the light propagation for the following: absorption (A), transmittance (T), attenuation (K), and scattering anisotropy coefficient (g) in dental tissues and nano-filled resin-based composites. This study used three distinct incremental build-up techniques, which included one shade (body), two shades (enamel and dentin), and three shades (enamel, transparent, and dentin).

Methods

Twenty human, un-erupted, recently extracted third molars (shade B1) were used to obtain 40 tooth slabs. The samples were randomized and equally distributed into four experimental groups. The Positive Control Group included dental tissues with enamel, dento-enamel junction DEJ, and dentin; the Technique 1 group (T1) included one shade tissues, B1B; the Technique 2 group (T2) included two-shades tissues, A2Dentin and B1Enamel; and the Technique 3 group (T3) included three shade tissues, A2Dentin, Transparent, and B1Enamel. Cavity preparation was standardized, and, using the spectrophotometer, each specimen was irradiated by three LASERs. A voltmeter recorded the light-output signal, and from this raw data, the following optical constants (A, T, K, g) were calculated.

Results

ANOVA, followed by a post hoc Tukey’s test (p < 0.05), revealed that absorption and transmittance in dental tissues were significantly different when comparing the three build-up technique groups. However, when examining attenuation coefficient, there was no significant difference in dental tissues for T2 and T3 as analyzed by blue and red lasers. There was also no significant difference among the three lasers for T2 and T3. There was also no significant effect of the types of experiments on the value of scattering anisotropy factor g for blue laser among the four experimental groups.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this study, none of the build-up techniques were able to reproduce the dental tissues optical properties, and T2 and T3 resulted in a similar pattern of light propagation.

Clinical significance

The clinical success of restorative procedures depends on selecting materials and techniques that emulate the natural tooth and provide long-term stability in color and optical properties.

Keywords

Light propagation Biomaterials Nano-filled composite Dental tissues 

Notes

Funding

The work was supported by the Project Pool from ADEA (American Dental Education Association).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author Hanan Elgendy declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Rodrigo Rocha Maia declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Fredrick Skiff declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Gerald Denehy declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Fang Qian declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM (2012) Craig’s restorative dental materials, 13th edition. Br Dent J 213(2):90–90Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paravina RD (2004) Esthetic color training in dentistry. Elsevier Mosby, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee YK (2008) Influence of filler on the difference between the transmitted and reflected colors of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater 24(9):1243–1247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Azzopardi N, Moharamzadeh K, Wood DJ, Martin N, van Noort R (2009) Effect of resin matrix composition on the translucency of experimental dental composite resins. Dent Mater 25(12):1564–1568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arimoto A, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Nishimura K, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J (2010) Translucency, opalescence and light transmission characteristics of light-cured resin composites. Dent Mater 26(11):1090–1097.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grajower R, Wozniak WT, Lindsay JM (1982) Optical properties of composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 9(5):389–399.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1982.tb01027.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnston WM, Reisbick M (1997) Color and translucency changes during and after curing of esthetic restorative materials. Dent Mater 13(2):89–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80017-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu B, Lee YK (2008) Differences in color, translucency and fluorescence between flowable and universal resin composites. J Dent 36(10):840–846.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sidhu S, Ikeda T, Omata Y, Fujita M, Sano H (2006) Change of color and translucency by light curing in resin composites. Oper Dent 31(5):598–603.  https://doi.org/10.2341/05-109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fernandez-Oliveras A, Rubiño M, Perez MM (2012) Scattering anisotropy measurements in dental tissues and biomaterials. Journal of the European Optical Society - Rapid publications, Europe, v. 7, May. 2012. ISSN 1990-2573Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taroni P, Pifferi A, Torricelli A, Comelli D, Cubeddu R (2003) In vivo absorption and scattering spectroscopy of biological tissues. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2(2):124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hariri I, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y (2012) Effects of structural orientation of enamel and dentine on light attenuation and local refractive index: an optical coherence tomography study. J Dent 40(5):387–396.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Naeimi Akbar H, Moharamzadeh K, Wood DJ, Van Noort R (2012) Relationship between color and translucency of multishaded dental composite resins. International Journal of Dentistry 2012(5):1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/708032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Watts DC, Cash AJ (1994) Analysis of optical transmittance by 400–500nm visible light into aesthetic dental biomaterials. J Dent 22(112):7Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vanini L (1996) Light and color in anterior composite restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 8(7):673–682Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    de Araujo Junior EM, Baratieri LN, Monteiro Junior S, Vieira LC et al (2003) Direct adhesive restoration of anterior teeth: part 3. Procedural considerations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 15(6):433–437 quiz 438Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fahl N, Denehy GE, Jackson RD (1995) Protocol for predictable restoration of anterior teeth with composite resins. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 7(8):13–21 quiz 22Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dietschi D, Ardu S, Krejci I (2006) A new shading concept based on natural tooth color applied to direct composite restorations. Quintessence Int 37(2):91–102Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Villarroel M, Fahl N, De Sousa AM, De Oliveira OB (2011) Direct esthetic restorations based on translucency and opacity of composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent 23(2):73–87.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00392.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vanini L (2012) Moving beyond classical shade guides to achieve natural restorations. Dental TribuneGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Naeimi Akbar H, Moharamzadeh K, Wood DJ, Van Noort R (2012) Relationship between color and translucency of multishaded dental composite resins. Int J Dent 2012:708032.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/708032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kamishima N, Ikeda T, Sano H (2005) Color and translucency of resin composites for layering techniques. Dent Mater J 24(3):428–432.  https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.24.428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Steinke JM, Shepherd AP (1988) Comparison of Mie theory and the light scattering of red blood cells. Appl Opt 27:4027–4033.  https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.27.004027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sardar DK, S FS, Perez JJ (2001) Optical characterization of melanin. J Biomed Opt 6:404–411.  https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1411978 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sardar DK, Yom RM, Tsin AT, Sardar R (2005) Optical scattering, absorption and polarization of healthy and neovascularized human retinal tissues. J Biomed Opt 10:051501.  https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2065867 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Houwink B (1974) The index of refraction of dental enamel apatite. Br Dent J 137:472–475.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4803346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spitzer D, Bosch JT (1975) The absorption and scattering of light in bovine and human dental enamel. Springer Verlag 17:129–137Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanan Elgendy
    • 1
  • Rodrigo Rocha Maia
    • 1
  • Fredrick Skiff
    • 2
  • Gerald Denehy
    • 1
  • Fang Qian
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Operative Dentistry, College of DentistryUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Liberal Arts & SciencesUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  3. 3.Division of Biostatistics and Research Design, Iowa Institute for Oral Health Research and Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, College of DentistryUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations