Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparative study of surgical drain placement and the use of kinesiologic tape to reduce postoperative morbidity after third molar surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Our aim was to compare the effects of the surgical drain and kinesiotape applications on postoperative morbidity after mandibular third molar surgery in a split-mouth study design.

Materials and methods

A single-centre, split-mouth study was performed in 23 patients who needed surgical removal of bilateral mandibular third molars. Each patient was treated with a drain tube on one side of the mandible and Kinesio tape (KT) on the contralateral side.

Results

Swelling was significantly greater in the KT group than in the drain group throughout the study period. The groups did not differ significantly in the amount of trismus at any time point. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-measured pain intensity was significantly lower in the drainage group. Patients with KT had greater postoperative discomfort than those with a drain tube. All patients were generally satisfied with their treatments.

Clinical relevance

Although both treatments were useful, a surgical drain was significantly more effective at reducing swelling and pain intensity than Kinesio tape. The effects of both on trismus were similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Szolnoky G, Szendi-Horváth K, Seres L, Boda K, Kemény L (2007) Manual lymph drainage efficiently reduces postoperative facial swelling and discomfort after removal of impacted third molars. Lymphology 40(3):138–142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cerqueira PR, Vasconcelos BC, Bessa-Nogueira RV (2004) Comparative study of the effect of a tube drain in impacted lower third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62(1):57–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koyuncu B, Zeytinoğlu M, Tetik A, Gomel MM (2015) Effect of tube drainage compared with conventional suturing on postoperative discomfort after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53(1):63–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chukwuneke FN, Oji C, Saheeb DB (2008) A comparative study of the effect of using a rubber drain on postoperative discomfort following lower third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37(4):341–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ristow O, Hohlweg-Majert B, Stürzenbaum SR, Kehl V, Koerdt S, Hahnefeld L, Pautke C (2014) Therapeutic elastic tape reduces morbidity after wisdom teeth removal—a clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 18(4):1205–1212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ristow O, Pautke C, Kehl V, Koerdt S, Schwärzler K, Hahnefeld L et al (2014) Influence of kinesiologic tape on postoperative swelling, pain and trismus after zygomatico-orbital fractures. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 42(5):469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ristow O, Hohlweg-Majert B, Kehl V, Koerdt S, Hahnefeld L, Pautke C (2013) Does elastic therapeutic tape reduce postoperative swelling, pain, and trismus after open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71(8):1387–1396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zandi M (2008) Comparison of corticosteroids and rubber drain for reduction of sequelae after third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg 12(1):29–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gelesko S, Long L, Faulk J, Phillips C, Dicus C, White RP (2011) Cryotherapy and topical minocycline as adjunctive measures to control pain after third molar surgery: an exploratory study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(11):e324–e332

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sierra SO, Deana AM, Bussadori SK, da Mota ACC, Motta LJ, Ferrari RAM et al (2015) Effect of low-intensity laser treatment on pain after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a randomised, controlled, clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53(10):996–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenstein G (2007) Therapeutic efficacy of cold therapy after intraoral surgical procedures: a literature review. J Periodontol 78(5):790–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubois D, Pizer M, Chinnis R (1982) Comparison of primary and secondary closure techniques after removal of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 11:630–634

    Google Scholar 

  13. Od O, Ra A, Uk O (2011) Management of inflammatory complications in third molar surgery. Afr Health Sci 11(3):530–537

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sağlam A (2003) Effects of tube drain with primary closure technique on postoperative trismus and swelling after removal of fully impacted mandibular third molars. Quintessence Int (Berl) 34(2):143–147

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ordulu M, Aktas I, Yalcin S, Azak AN, Evlioğlu G, Disçi R, Emes Y (2006) Comparative study of the effect of tube drainage versus methylprednisolone after third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101(6):e96–e100

  16. Kumar B, Bhate K, Dolas RS, Kumar SS, Waknis P (2016) Comparative evaluation of immediate post-operative sequelae after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar with or without tube drain—split-mouth study. J Clin Diagn Res 10(12):ZC46–ZC49

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Younger J, McCue R, Mackey S (2009) Pain outcomes: a brief review of instruments and techniques. Curr Pain Headache Rep 13(1):39–43

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kase K, Hashimoto T, Tomoki O (1996) Development of kinesio taping perfect manual. Kinesio Taping Association, Tokyo, pp 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rakprasitkul S, Pairuchvej V (1997) Mandibular third molar surgery with primary closure and tube drain. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26:187–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Xue P, Wang J, Wu B, Ma Y, Wu F, Hou R (2015) Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis on postoperative inflammatory complications in Chinese patients having impacted mandibular third molars removed: a split- mouth, double-blind, self-controlled, clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:416–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mevlut Uzun for assistance with statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sirmahan Cakarer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of our institutional and/or national research committee(s) and those of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the ethics review board of Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Genc, A., Cakarer, S., Yalcin, B.K. et al. A comparative study of surgical drain placement and the use of kinesiologic tape to reduce postoperative morbidity after third molar surgery. Clin Oral Invest 23, 345–350 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2442-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2442-x

Keywords

Navigation