Nine prophylactic polishing pastes: impact on discoloration, gloss, and surface properties of a CAD/CAM resin composite
- 194 Downloads
To investigate discoloration reduction and changes of surface properties of a CAD/CAM resin composite after 14 days´ storage in red wine and polishing with nine different prophylactic polishing pastes (PPPs).
Materials and methods
Rectangular discs (N = 172) were fabricated and polished (P4000) using GC Cerasmart (GC Europe) to investigate different polishing protocols with 1–4 related descending PPPs (22 in total): Cleanic/CLE-Kerr, CleanJoy/CLJ-Voco, Clean Polish/Super Polish/SPO-Kerr, Clinpro Prophy Paste/CPP-3M, Détartrine/DET-Septodont, Nupro/NUP-Dentsply Sirona, Prophy Paste CCS/CCS-Directa, Proxyt/PXT-Ivoclar Vivadent, and Zircate/ZIR Prophy Paste-Dentsply Sirona. Surface properties (roughness values (RV)/Ra, Rz, Rv, surface free energy (SFE), surface gloss (G), and discoloration (ΔE)) were analyzed before and after storage and additional polishing. Data were examined using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-B post hoc, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis H tests (α < 0.05).
Regarding RV, CLE, followed by CCS, and CPP showed the highest values; the lowest presented SPO and DET (p < 0.001). No impact of PPP was observed on ΔE values (p = 0.160). The lowest SFE presented DET, followed by SPO; highest showed CCS followed by NUP and CPP (p < 0.001). Within G, lowest values were observed for CLE and NUP, followed by CCS, ZIP, and CLJ (p < 0.001); the highest presented SPO (p < 0.001). Polishing showed generally a positive impact on SFE values (p < 0.001–p = 0.007), except ZIP (p = 0.322) and CLE (p = 0.083). G increased and RV decreased after polishing (p < 0.001), except SPO, with no significant change for G (p = 0.786).
Polishing with PPPs improves the surface properties and is generally recommended. The choice of PPP has a minor role in removing discolorations. Multi-step systems should be carried out conscientiously.
The proper selection of PPP is essential for the clinical outcome of surface properties of prosthetic restorations. Not every polishing paste leads to the same final surface quality.
KeywordsProphylactic polishing paste CAD/CAM resin composite Surface gloss Surface roughness Surface free energy Discoloration
The authors would like to thank 3M, Dentsply Sirona, Directa, Ivoclar Vivadent, Kerr, Septodont, and Voco for providing the materials used in this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 5.Mörmann WH1, Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Sener B, Attin T, Mehl A (2013) Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and martens hardness. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 20:113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Neme Al FKB, Roeder LB, Debner TL (2002) Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 27:50–58Google Scholar
- 10.Patil SS, Rakhewar PS, Limaye PS, Chaudhari NP (2015) A comparative evaluation of plaque-removing efficacy of air polishing and rubber-cup, bristle brush with paste polishing on oral hygiene status: a clinical study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 5:457–462. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.167723 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Bames CM (2009) The science of polishing. Dimen. Dent Hyg 7:18–22Google Scholar
- 15.Strassler HE, Baum G (1993) Current concepts in polishing composite resins. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 3:12–17Google Scholar
- 16.Yap AU, Lye KW, Sau CW (1997) Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Oper Dent 22:260–265Google Scholar
- 17.Hoelscher DC, Neme AM, Pink FE, Hughes PJ (1998) The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 23:36–42Google Scholar
- 18.Setcos JC, Tarim B, Suzuki S (1999) Surface finish produced on resin composites by new polishing systems. Quintessence Int 30:169–173Google Scholar
- 19.Goldstein RE (1989) Finishing of composites and laminates. Dent Clin N Am 33:305–318Google Scholar
- 20.Lutz F, Sener B, Imfeld T, Barbakow F, Schupbach P (1993) Self-adjusting abrasiveness: a new technology for prophylaxis pastes. Quintessence Int 24:53–63Google Scholar
- 21.Fruits TJ, Miranda FJ, Coury TL (1996) Effects of equivalent abrasive grit sizes utilizing differing polishing motions on selected restorative materials. Quintessence Int 27:279–285Google Scholar
- 35.Attar N (2007) The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 8:27–35Google Scholar
- 36.Türkün LS, Türkün M (2004) The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 29-2:203–211Google Scholar
- 38.Strassler H (1990) Polishing composite resins to perfection depends on the filler. Dent Off 10:9–10Google Scholar