Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 107–112 | Cite as

Prevalence of C-shaped canal system in mandibular first and second molars in a Saudi population assessed via cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective study

  • Hussam AlfawazEmail author
  • Abdullah Alqedairi
  • Abdulrahman K. Alkhayyal
  • Abdulaziz A. Almobarak
  • Mohannad F. Alhusain
  • Jorge N. R. Martins
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of the C-shaped root canal configuration, location of the longitudinal groove, sex differences, and unilateral/bilateral presence in mandibular first and second molars in a Saudi population using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials and methods

CBCT images for the mandibular first and second molars of 487 patients (a total of 529 first molars and 681 s molars) were evaluated. The teeth were assessed for the presence of C-shaped root canals according to Fan criteria. Subdivisions were also made according to sex, direction of the longitudinal groove, and unilateral/bilateral presence.

Results

Only one C-shaped mandibular first molar was observed (0.19%), whereas 62 second molars (9.1%) exhibited C-shaped anatomy. Unilateral presence of the C-shaped root canal system was more common (53.85%). Female patients had a higher prevalence than males. Longitudinal grooves were most commonly found on the root lingual surface (58.1%).

Conclusions

The prevalence of the C-shaped canal configuration in a Saudi Arabian population was 0.19% in the mandibular first molar and 9.1% in the mandibular second molar. Longitudinal groove prevalence was highest on the lingual surface. Women had a significantly higher prevalence of the C-shaped canal configuration than men. Patients with unilateral presence of the C-shaped canal configuration were more common than those with bilateral presence.

Clinical relevance

Tooth type, patient sex, and ethnicity can help clinicians predict the prevalence of the C-shaped canal system in mandibular molars.

Keywords

C-shaped canal Cone beam computed tomography Mandibular molar Longitudinal groove Dental anatomy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the College of Dentistry Research Center (CDRC) and Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Science Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud University.

Funding

The study was self-funded.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the local institutional review board (No. E-17-2786).

Informed consent

Consent was not required for this type of study.

References

  1. 1.
    De Pablo OV, Estevez R, Peix Sanchez M, Heilborn C, Cohenca N (2010) Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: a systematic review. J Endod 36:1919–1931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooke HG 3rd, Cox FL (1979) C-shaped canal configurations in mandibular molars. J Am Dent Assoc 99:836–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barril I, Cochet JY, Ricci C (1989) Treatment of a canal with a “C” configuration. Rev Fr Endod 8:47–58Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang ZP, Yang SF, Lin YC, Shay JC, Chi CY (1988) C-shaped root canals in mandibular second molars in a Chinese population. Endod Dent Traumatol 4:160–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manning SA (1990) Root canal anatomy of mandibular second molars. Part II. C-shaped canals. Int Endod J 23:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Melton DC, Krell KV, Fuller MW (1991) Anatomical and histological features of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars. J Endod 17:384–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fan B, Cheung GS, Fan M, Gutmann JL, Bian Z (2004) C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars: Part I—Anatomical features. J Endod 30:899–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tachibana H, Matsumoto K (1990) Applicability of x-ray computerized tomography in endodontics. Dent Traumatol 6:16–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D (2003) Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96:508–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ (2005) Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose cone beam CT. Eur J Radiol 56:413–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, Whaites E (2007) The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J 40:818–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Al-Fouzan KS (2002) C-shaped root canals in mandibular second molars in a Saudi Arabian population. Int Endod J 35:499–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Solomonov M, Paque F, Fan B, Eilat Y, Berman LH (2012) The challenge of C-shaped canal systems: a comparative study of the self-adjusting file and ProTaper. J Endod 38:209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jafarzadeh H, Wu YN (2007) The C-shaped root canal configuration: a review. J Endod 33:517–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walid N (2000) The use of two pluggers for the obturation of an uncommon C-shaped canal. J Endod 26:422–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lambrianidis T, Lyroudia K, Pandelidou O, Nicolaou A (2001) Evaluation of periapical radiographs in the recognition of C-shaped mandibular second molars. Int Endod J 34:458–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vertucci FJ (1984) Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 58:589–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bolger WL, Schindler WG (1988) A mandibular first molar with a C-shaped root configuration. J Endod 14:515–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Walker RT (1988) Root form and canal anatomy of mandibular second molars in a southern Chinese population. J Endod 14:325–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weine FS, Pasiewicz RA, Rice RT (1988) Canal configuration of the mandibular second molar using a clinically oriented in vitro method. J Endod 14:207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martins JNR, Francisco H, Ordinola-Zapata R (2017) Prevalence of C-shaped configurations in the mandibular first and second premolars: a cone-beam computed tomographic in vivo study. J Endod 43:890–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bóveda C, Fajardo M, Millán B (1999) Root canal treatment of an invaginated maxillary lateral incisor with a C-shaped canal. Quintessence Int 30:707–711Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martins JN, Mata A, Marques D, Anderson C, Carames J (2016) Prevalence and characteristics of the maxillary C-shaped molar. J Endod 42:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Silva EJNL, Nejaim Y, Silva AV, Haiter-Neto F, Cohenca N (2013) Evaluation of root canal configuration of mandibular molars in a Brazilian population by using cone-beam computed tomography: an in vivo study. J Endod 39:849–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martins JN, Mata A, Marques D, Caramês J (2016) Prevalence of C-shaped mandibular molars in the Portuguese population evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent 10:529–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fernandes M, De Ataide I, Wagle R (2014) C-shaped root canal configuration: a review of literature. J Conserv Dent 17:312–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jin G-C, Lee S-J, Roh B-D (2006) Anatomical study of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars by analysis of computed tomography. J Endod 32:10–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zheng Q, Zhang L, Zhou X, Wang Q, Wang Y, Tang L, Song F, Huang D (2011) C-shaped root canal system in mandibular second molars in a Chinese population evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 44:857–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gulabivala K, Aung T, Alavi A, Ng YL (2001) Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J 34:359–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    von Zuben M, Martins JNR, Berti L, Cassim I, Flynn D, Gonzalez JA, Gu Y, Kottoor J, Monroe A, Rosas Aguilar R, Marques MS, Ginjeira A (2017) Worldwide prevalence of mandibular second molar C-shaped morphologies evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 43:1442–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Alavi A (2002) Root and canal morphology of Thai mandibular molars. Int Endod J 35:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rogazkyn D, Solomonov M (2016) The prevalence and asymmetry of C-shaped root canals in second mandibular molars in a European–Russian population: a cone-beam computed tomography study in vivo. Int Endod. J Rehabil 2:12–16Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ladeira DBS, Cruz AD, Freitas DQ, Almeida SM (2014) Prevalence of C-shaped root canal in a Brazilian subpopulation: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis. Braz Oral Res 28:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Helvacioglu-Yigit D, Sinanoglu A (2013) Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second molars in a Turkish subpopulation: a retrospective study. Int Endod J 46:1032–1038Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Madani ZS, Mehraban N, Moudi E, Bijani A (2017) Root and canal morphology of mandibular molars in a selected Iranian population using cone-beam computed tomography. Iran Endod J 12:143–148Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Haddad GY, Nehme WB, Ounsi HF (1999) Diagnosis, classification, and frequency of C-shaped canals in mandibular second molars in the Lebanese population. J Endod 25:268–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Endodontic Division, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of DentistryKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Private Dental PracticeRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Department of Endodontics, Faculdade de Medicina DentáriaUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations