Assessing oral health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: a systematic review and standardized comparison of available instruments
- 87 Downloads
To obtain a systematic and standardized evaluation of the current evidence on development process, metric properties, and administration issues of oral health-related quality of life instruments available for children and adolescents.
Materials and methods
A systematic search until October 2016 was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, SciELO, and Cochrane databases. Articles with information regarding the development process, metric properties, and administration issues of pediatric instruments measuring oral health-related quality of life were eligible for inclusion. Two researchers independently evaluated each instrument applying the Evaluating Measures of Patient-Reported Outcomes (EMPRO) tool. An overall and seven attribute-specific EMPRO scores were calculated (range 0–100, worst to best): measurement model, reliability, validity, responsiveness, interpretability, burden, and alternative forms.
We identified 18 instruments evaluated in 132 articles. From five instruments designed for preschoolers, the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) obtained the highest overall EMPRO score (82.2). Of nine identified for schoolchildren and adolescents, the best rated instrument was the Child Perceptions Questionnaire 11–14 (82.1). Among the four instruments developed for any age, the Family Impact Scale (FIS) obtained the highest scores (80.3).
The evidence supports the use of the ECOHIS for preschoolers, while the age is a key factor when choosing among the four recommended instruments for schoolchildren and adolescents. Instruments for specific conditions, symptoms, or treatments need further research on metric properties.
Our results facilitate decision-making on the correct oral health-related quality of life instrument selection for any certain study purpose and population during the childhood and adolescence life cycle.
KeywordsOral health Quality of life Questionnaires Psychometrics Outcome assessment Child
We would like to acknowledge Aurea Martin for her help in the English editing process and figure edition of this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 2.Aldrigui JM, Jabbar NS, Bonecker M, Braga MM, Wanderley MT (2014) Trends and associated factors in prevalence of dental trauma in Latin America and Caribbean: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 42:30–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12053 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Kassebaum NJ, Smith AGC, Bernabé E, Fleming TD, Reynolds AE, Vos T, Murray CJL, Marcenes W, GBD 2015 Oral Health Collaborators (2017) Global, regional, and national prevalence, incidence, and disability-adjusted life years for oral conditions for 195 countries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. J Dent Res 96:380–387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Zaror C, Martinez-Zapata MJ, Abarca J, Diaz J, Pardo Y, Pont A, Ferrer M (2018) Impact of traumatic dental injuries on quality of life in preschoolers and schoolchildren: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 46:88–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12333 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Valderas JM, Ferrer M, Mendivil J, Garin O, Rajmil L, Herdman M, Alonso J, Scientific Committee on “Patient-Reported Outcomes” of the IRYSS Network (2008) Development of EMPRO: a tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures. Value Health 11:700–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00309.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19:539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Garin O, Herdman M, Vilagut G, Ferrer M, Ribera A, Rajmil L, Valderas JM, Guillemin F, Revicki D, Alonso J (2014) Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure: a systematic, standardized comparison of available measures. Heart Fail Rev 19:359–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-013-9394-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Schmidt S, Ferrer M, Gonzalez M, Gonzalez N, Valderas JM, Alonso J, Escobar A, Vrotsou K, Group E (2014) Evaluation of shoulder-specific patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic and standardized comparison of available evidence. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Schmidt S, Garin O, Pardo Y, Valderas JM, Alonso J, Rebollo P, Rajmil L, Garcia-Forero C, Ferrer M, Group E (2014) Assessing quality of life in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic and standardized comparison of available instruments. Qual Life Res 23:2169–2181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0678-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Gibbons CJ, Bee PE, Walker L, Price O, Lovell K (2014) Service user- and career-reported measures of involvement in mental health care planning: methodological quality and acceptability to users. Front Psychiatry 5:178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00178 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Higgins JPT, Green S (editors) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org
- 35.Patel N, Hodges SJ, Hall M, Benson PE, Marshman Z, Cunningham SJ (2016) Development of the malocclusion impact questionnaire (MIQ) to measure the oral health-related quality of life of young people with malocclusion: part 1—qualitative inquiry. J Orthod 43:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14653125.2015.1114712 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 41.Gomes MC, Pinto-Sarmento TC, Costa EM, Martins CC, Granville-Garcia AF, Paiva SM (2014) Impact of oral health conditions on the quality of life of preschool children and their families: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-55 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 48.Kumar S, Kroon J, Lalloo R, Johnson NW (2016) Validity and reliability of short forms of parental-caregiver perception and family impact scale in a Telugu speaking population of India. Health Qual Life Outcomes 14:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0433-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 51.Piovesan C, Batista A, Ferreira F, Ardenghi TM (2009) Oral health-related quality of life in children: conceptual issues. Rev Odonto Cienc 24(1):81–85Google Scholar
- 54.Barbosa TS, Gaviao MB (2008) Oral health-related quality of life in children: part III. Is there agreement between parents in rating their children’s oral health-related quality of life? A systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 6:108–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00271.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar