Postoperative pain after removal of gutta-percha from root canals in endodontic retreatment using rotary or reciprocating instruments: a prospective clinical study
The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate and compare the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain following removal of gutta-percha from root canals using rotary and reciprocating instruments.
Materials and methods
One hundred and sixty patients scheduled for a non-surgical endodontic retreatment were included for evaluation. Preoperative pain was recorded with using a questionnaire with a 10-cm visual analogical scale (VAS). Endodontic filling material was removed with Reciproc (VDW, Munich, Germany) or ProFile (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) instruments. Patients then recorded their postoperative pain in a VAS pain scale at 4, 8, 16, 24, 48, and 72 h post-treatment. Results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and Chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic and a multiple regression analysis were used to detect the effect of confounding factors.
Results showed a direct relation between the intensity of pre-operative pain and that of postoperative pain (P < .05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding postoperative pain (P > .05) as a qualitative variable. As numerical values, statistically significant differences were found regarding sex and the system used (P < .05).
The method for pain evaluation was determinant in postoperative pain findings. Endodontic retreatment preparation with Reciproc results in lower values of postoperative pain compared with ProFile. Women are more susceptible to postoperative pain than are men.
One of the most significant contributions of this research is the importance given to the method used for pain evaluation. The present study analyzed postoperative pain resulting from the use of reciprocating or continuous rotary instruments during removal of gutta-percha in retreatment procedures.
KeywordsPostoperative pain Endodontic retreatment Reciproc ProFile
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics in Research Committee (END-ECL-2013-01). All patients included in this study were previously given an informed consent about the procedure, risks and benefits, as well as their right to decide whether to participate or not.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. Project n. END-ECL-2013-01 was approved by the Committee of Research and Ethics of the Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Alley BS, Kitchens GG, Alley LW, Eleazer PD (2004) A comparison of survival of teeth following endodontic treatment performed by general dentists or by specialists. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98(1):115–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.01.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Topçuoğlu HS, Topçuoğlu G (2017) Postoperative pain after the removal of root canal filling material using different techniques in teeth with failed root canal therapy: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Odontol Scand 75(4):249–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2017.1283707 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Genet JM, Wesselink PR, Thoden van Velzen SK (1986) The incidence of preoperative and postoperative pain in endodontic therapy. Int Endod J 19(5):221–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1986.tb00482.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Silva EJ, Menaged K, Ajuz N, Monteiro MR, Coutinho-Filho Tde S (2013) Postoperative pain after foraminal enlargement in anterior teeth with necrosis and apical periodontitis: a prospective and randomized clinical trial. J Endod 39(2):173–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Siqueira JF Jr (1997) Tratamento das Infecções Endodônticas. Medsi, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGoogle Scholar
- 31.Caviedes-Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz HR (2016) The influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J 49(3):255–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12452 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Caviedes-Bucheli J, Azuero-Holguin MM, Gutierrez-Sanchez L, Higuerey-Bermudez F, Pereira-Nava V, Lombana N, Munoz HR (2010) The effect of three different rotary instrumentation systems on substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide expression in human periodontal ligament. J Endod 36(12):1938–1942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.043 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar