Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 22, Issue 7, pp 2559–2566 | Cite as

Expression and localization of CRAMP in rat tooth germ and during reparative dentin formation

  • Kanji Horibe
  • Akihiro Hosoya
  • Toru Hiraga
  • Hiroaki Nakamura
Original Article
  • 252 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

Cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide (CRAMP) is an antimicrobial peptide in mice and rats homologous to LL-37 in humans. In addition to its antibacterial activity, CRAMP has various physiological functions by binding to formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2). However, the role of these peptides in teeth is unknown. Therefore, we investigated the role of CRAMP and FPR2 in tooth development, reparative dentin formation, and defense response.

Material and methods

First, we examined the localization of CRAMP and FPR2 during tooth development by immunohistochemical analysis. Next, we investigated the localization of CRAMP, FPR2, and CD68-positive macrophages by immunohistochemical analysis during pulp inflammation and reparative dentin formation after cavity preparation. Finally, we analyzed the effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the expression of CRAMP and FPR2 in dental pulp cells by real-time reverse transcription PCR.

Results

At the late bell stage in tooth development, CRAMP was detected in odontoblasts, and FPR2 was observed in the sub-odontoblastic layer. In mature teeth, CRAMP was not detected, but FPR2 continued to be localized in the sub-odontoblastic layer. After cavity preparation, CRAMP-positive cells and macrophages were found in dental pulp tissues below the cavity at an early stage of repair. At subsequent stages of reparative dentin formation, CRAMP was observed in odontoblast-like cells that contacted reparative dentin. FPR2 immunoreactivity was also detected in odontoblast-like cells and neighboring cells. LPS stimulated the expression of CRAMP mRNA in dental pulp cells in vitro.

Conclusions

Localization of CRAMP and its receptor FPR2-positive cells were observed during physiological and reparative dentin formation.

Clinical relevance

CRAMP/LL-37 has a possibility that induce reparative dentin formation.

Keywords

Antimicrobial peptide Tooth development Cavity preparation Odontoblast Reparative dentin 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We express our sincere thanks to Dr. Takahashi of the Institute for Oral Science, Matsumoto Dental University for helpful discussions and encouragement.

Funding

This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number JP26893301.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines for studies with laboratory animals of the Matsumoto Dental University Experimental Animal Committee.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Soehnlein O, Wantha S, Simsekyilmaz S, Döring Y, Megens RT, Mause SF, Drechsler M, Smeets R, Weinandy S, Schreiber F, Gries T, Jockenhoevel S, Möller M, Vijayan S, van Zandvoort MA, Agerberth B, Pham CT, Gallo RL, Hackeng TM, Liehn EA, Zernecke A, Klee D, Weber C (2011) Neutrophil-derived cathelicidin protects from neointimal hyperplasia. Sci Transl Med 3:103ra98CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosenberger CM, Gallo RL, Finlay BB (2004) Interplay between antibacterial effectors: a macrophage antimicrobial peptide impairs intracellular Salmonella replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(8):2422–2427.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0304455101 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chromek M, Slamová Z, Bergman P, Kovács L, Podracká L, Ehrén I, Hökfelt T, Gudmundsson GH, Gallo RL, Agerberth B, Brauner A (2006) The antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin protects the urinary tract against invasive bacterial infection. Nat Med 12(6):636–641.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1407 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kovach MA, Ballinger MN, Newstead MW, Zeng X, Bhan U, Yu FS, Moore BB, Gallo RL, Standiford TJ (2012) Cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide is required for effective lung mucosal immunity in Gram-negative bacterial pneumonia. J Immunol 189(1):304–311.  https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1103196 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosenfeld Y, Papo N, Shai Y (2006) Endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide) neutralization by innate immunity host-defense peptides. Peptide properties and plausible modes of action J Biol Chem 281(3):1636–1643.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M504327200 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kandler K, Shaykhiev R, Kleemann P, Klescz F, Lohoff M, Vogelmeier C, Bals R (2006) The anti-microbial peptide LL-37 inhibits the activation of dendritic cells by TLR ligands. Int Immunol 18(12):1729–1736.  https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxl107 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mookherjee N, Brown KL, Bowdish DM, Doria S, Falsafi R, Hokamp K, Roche FM, Mu R, Doho GH, Pistolic J, Powers JP, Bryan J, Brinkman FS, Hancock RE (2006) Modulation of the TLRmediated inflammatory response by the endogenous human host defense peptide LL-37. J Immunol 176(4):2455–2464.  https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.176.4.2455 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang D, Chen Q, Schmidt AP, Anderson GM, Wang JM, Wooters J, Oppenheim JJ, Chertov O (2000) LL-37, the neutrophil granule- and epithelial cell-derived cathelicidin, utilizes formyl peptide receptor-like 1 (FPRL1) as a receptor to chemoattract human peripheral blood neutrophils, monocytes, and T cells. J Exp Med 192(7):1069–1074.  https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.192.7.1069 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurosaka K, Chen Q, Yarovinsky F, Oppenheim JJ, Yang D (2005) Mouse cathelin-related antimicrobial peptide chemoattracts leukocytes using formyl peptide receptor-like 1/mouse formyl peptide receptor-like 2 as the receptor and acts as an immune adjuvant. J Immunol 174(10):6257–6265.  https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6257 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koczulla R, von Degenfeld G, Kupatt C, Krötz F, Zahler S, Gloe T, Issbrücker K, Unterberger P, Zaiou M, Lebherz C, Karl A, Raake P, Pfosser A, Boekstegers P, Welsch U, Hiemstra PS, Vogelmeier C, Gallo RL, Clauss M, Bals R (2003) An angiogenic role for the human peptide antibiotic LL-37/hCAP-18. J Clin Invest 111(11):1665–1672.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI17545 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr (2010) Fate of the tissue in lateral canals and apical ramifications in response to pathologic conditions and treatment procedures. J Endod 36(1):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.038 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ohshima H (1990) Ultrastructural changes in odontoblasts and pulp capillaries following cavity preparation in rat molars. Arch Histol Cytol 53(4):423–438.  https://doi.org/10.1679/aohc.53.423 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Izumi T, Kobayashi I, Okamura K, Sakai H (1995) Immunohistochemical study on the immunocompetent cells of the pulp in human non-carious and carious teeth. Arch Oral Biol 40(7):609–614.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(95)00024-J CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hahn CL, Liewehr FR (2007) Innate immune responses of the dental pulp to caries. J Endod 33(6):643–651.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.01.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bruno KF, Silva JA, Silva TA, Batista AC, Alencar AH, Estrela C (2010) Characterization of inflammatory cell infiltrate in human dental pulpitis. Int Endod J 43(11):1013–1021.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01757.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farges JC, Alliot-Licht B, Renard E, Ducret M, Gaudin A, Smith AJ, Cooper PR (2015) Dental pulp defence and repair mechanisms in dental caries. Mediat Inflamm 2015:230251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tani-Ishii N, Wang CY, Stashenko P (1995) Immunolocalization of bone-resorptive cytokines in rat pulp and periapical lesions following surgical pulp exposure. Oral Microbiol Immunol 10(4):213–219.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1995.tb00145.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harada M, Kenmotsu S, Nakasone N, Nakakura-Ohshima K, Ohshima H (2008) Cell dynamics in the pulpal healing process following cavity preparation in rat molars. Histochem Cell Biol 130(4):773–783.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-008-0438-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith AJ, Cassidy N, Perry H, Bègue-Kirn C, Ruch JV, Lesot H (1995) Reactionary dentinogenesis. Int J Dev Biol 39(1):273–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cooper PR, Takahashi Y, Graham LW, Simon S, Imazato S, Smith AJ (2010) Inflammation–regeneration interplay in the dentine–pulp complex. J Dent 38(9):687–697.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tziafas D, Smith AJ, Lesot H (2000) Designing new treatment strategies in vital pulp therapy. J Dent 28(2):77–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00047-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sloan AJ, Smith AJ (2007) Stem cells and the dental pulp: potential roles in dentine regeneration and repair. Oral Dis 13(2):151–157.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01346.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith AJ, Lesot H (2001) Induction and regulation of crown dentinogenesis: embryonic events as a template for dental tissue repair? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 12(5):425–437.  https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411010120050501 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hosoya A, Nakamura H (2015) Ability of stem and progenitor cells in the dental pulp to form hard tissue. Japanese Dental Science Review 51(3):75–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2015.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Feng J, Mantesso A, De Bari C, Nishiyama A, Sharpe PT (2011) Dual origin of mesenchymal stem cells contributing to organ growth and repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(16):6503–6508.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015449108 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhao H, Feng J, Seidel K, Shi S, Klein O, Sharpe P, Chai Y (2014) Secretion of Shh by a neurovascular bundle niche supports mesenchymal stem cell homeostasis in the adult mouse incisor. Cell Stem Cell 14(2):160–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2013.12.013 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sarmiento BF, Aminoshariae A, Bakkar M, Bonfield T, Ghosh S, Montagnese TA, Mickel AK (2016) The expression of the human cathelicidin LL-37 in the human dental pulp: an in vivo study. Int J Pharm 1:5Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khung R, Shiba H, Kajiya M, Kittaka M, Ouhara K, Takeda K, Mizuno N, Fujita T, Komatsuzawa H, Kurihara H (2015) LL37 induces VEGF expression in dental pulp cells through ERK signalling. Int Endod J 48(7):673–679.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12365 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hosoya A, Yoshiba K, Yoshiba N, Hoshi K, Iwaku M, Ozawa H (2003) An immunohistochemical study on hard tissue formation in a subcutaneously transplanted rat molar. Histochem Cell Biol 119(1):27–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-002-0478-z PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kasugai S, Shibata S, Suzuki S, Susami T, Ogura H (1993) Characterization of a system of mineralized-tissue formation by rat dental pulp cells in culture. Arch Oral Biol 38(9):769–777.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(93)90073-U CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maddox JF, Hachicha M, Takano T, Petasis NA, Fokin VV, Serhan CN (1997) Lipoxin A4 stable analogs are potent mimetics that stimulate human monocytes and THP-1 cells via a G-protein-linked lipoxin A4 receptor. J Biol Chem 272(11):6972–6978.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.11.6972 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Krishnamoorthy S, Recchiuti A, Chiang N, Yacoubian S, Lee CH, Yang R, Petasis NA, Serhan CN (2010) Resolvin D1 binds human phagocytes with evidence for proresolving receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(4):1660–1665.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907342107 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Viswanathan A, Painter RG, Lanson NA Jr, Wang G (2007) Functional expression of N-formyl peptide receptors in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 25(5):1263–1269.  https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2006-0522 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Coffelt SB, Marini FC, Watson K, Zwezdaryk KJ, Dembinski JL, LaMarca HL, Tomchuck SL, Honer ZU, Bentrup K, Danka ES, Henkle SL, Scandurro AB (2009) The pro-inflammatory peptide LL-37 promotes ovarian tumor progression through recruitment of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(10):3806–3811.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900244106 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kittaka M, Shiba H, Kajiya M, Fujita T, Iwata T, Rathvisal K, Ouhara K, Takeda K, Fujita T, Komatsuzawa H, Kurihara H (2013) The antimicrobial peptide LL37 promotes bone regeneration in a ratcalvarial bone defect. Peptides 46:136–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2013.06.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Horibe K, Nakamichi Y, Uehara S, Nakamura M, Koide M, Kobayashi Y, Takahashi N, Udagawa N (2013) Roles of cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide in murine osteoclastogenesis. Immunology 140(3):344–351.  https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12146 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Oral HistologyMatsumoto Dental UniversityNaganoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Histology, School of DentistryHealth Sciences University of HokkaidoHokkaidoJapan

Personalised recommendations