Clinical and histologic evaluation of different approaches to gain keratinized tissue prior to implant placement in fully edentulous patients
- 670 Downloads
This work aimed to investigate the effectiveness and predictability of different treatment modalities for gain of keratinized tissue (KT) in fully edentulous jaws prior to dental implant placement: apically positioned flap (APF), APF plus xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM), and APF plus free gingival graft (FGG).
Materials and methods
In fully edentulous patients with insufficient zones of KT at the prospective implant positions, four treatment modalities were performed in the lower jaw: APF, XCM, FGG, and an untreated control group (control). APF and XCM were applied in the first molar positions, FGG and control in the canine positions. Assessed outcomes up to 3 months post-surgery included changes in width of KT (over a 3-month period), histomorphometric analysis of harvested soft-tissue biopsies (at 3 months postoperatively), and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs).
For the primary outcome, changes in KT width demonstrated an increase of 1.93 ± 1.6 mm (APF), whereas XCM and FGG showed an increase of 4.63 ± 1.25 mm and 3.64 ± 2.01, respectively. Histomorphometric analyses revealed a thickness of the epithelium ranging between 375 ± 122 μm (APF), 410 ± 116 μm (XCM), 336 ± 122 μm (FGG), and 413 ± 109 μm (control). All biopsies showed a regular muco-periosteal structure with a keratinized epithelium of comparable thickness in all groups.
All three methods were suitable to increase the width of KT, although APF alone rendered roughly 50% less gain compared to XCM and FGG.
The use of XCM in conjunction with an APF represents a valuable treatment option for the gain of keratinized tissue in edentulous sites.
KeywordsCollagen Matrix Augmentation Keratinized tissue Keratinized mucosa Autologous Gingival graft Transplantation Patient-reported outcome measures
The present study was supported by the Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich and by a research grant of Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 3.Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI, Lindhe J, Eriksson B, Sbordone L (1986) Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 15(1):39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(86)80010-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Langer B (1996) The regeneration of soft tissue and bone around implants with and without membranes Compend Contin Educ dent 17:268-70, 272 passim; quiz 280Google Scholar
- 8.Schrott AR, Jimenez M, Hwang JW, Fiorellini J, Weber HP (2009) Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 20(10):1170–1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01795.x PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Ueno D, Nagano T, Watanabe T, Shirakawa S, Yashima A, Gomi K (2016) Effect of the keratinized mucosa width on the health status of periimplant and contralateral periodontal tissues: a cross-sectional study. Implant Dent 25(6):796–801. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000483 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.McGuire MK, Nunn ME (2005) Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of periodontal applications of a living tissue-engineered human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute. I. Comparison to the gingival autograft: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Periodontol 76(6):867–880. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.6.867 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Schmitt CM, Moest T, Lutz R, Wehrhan F, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA (2016) Long-term outcomes after vestibuloplasty with a porcine collagen matrix (Mucograft(R) ) versus the free gingival graft: a comparative prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 27(11):e125–e133. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12575 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Jepsen K, Jepsen S, Zucchelli G, Stefanini M, de Sanctis M, Baldini N, Greven B, Heinz B, Wennstrom J, Cassel B, Vignoletti F, Sanz M (2013) Treatment of gingival recession defects with a coronally advanced flap and a xenogeneic collagen matrix: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 40(1):82–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12019 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Sanz M, Lorenzo R, Aranda JJ, Martin C, Orsini M (2009) Clinical evaluation of a new collagen matrix (Mucograft prototype) to enhance the width of keratinized tissue in patients with fixed prosthetic restorations: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 36(10):868–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01460.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Hilbe M, Hammerle CH, Husler J, Jung RE (2016) Randomized controlled clinical study evaluating effectiveness and safety of a volume-stable collagen matrix compared to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites. J Clin Periodontol 43(10):874–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12588 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Sheikh Z, Qureshi J, Alshahrani AM, Nassar H, Ikeda Y, Glogauer M, Ganss B (2017) Collagen based barrier membranes for periodontal guided bone regeneration applications. Odontology/the Society of the Nippon Dental University 105(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0267-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Vignoletti F, Nunez J, Sanz M (2014) Soft tissue wound healing at teeth, dental implants and the edentulous ridge when using barrier membranes, growth and differentiation factors and soft tissue substitutes. J Clin Periodontol 41 Suppl 15:S23–S35. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12191 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Cortell-Ballester I, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Gay-Escoda C (2015) Effects of collagen resorbable membrane placement after the surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73(8):1457–1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Vignoletti F, Nunez J, Discepoli N, De Sanctis F, Caffesse R, Munoz F, Lopez M, Sanz M (2011) Clinical and histological healing of a new collagen matrix in combination with the coronally advanced flap for the treatment of Miller class-I recession defects: an experimental study in the minipig. J Clin Periodontol 38(9):847–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01767.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Lorenzo R, Garcia V, Orsini M, Martin C, Sanz M (2012) Clinical efficacy of a xenogeneic collagen matrix in augmenting keratinized mucosa around implants: a randomized controlled prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(3):316–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02260.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Basegmez C, Ersanli S, Demirel K, Bolukbasi N, Yalcin S (2012) The comparison of two techniques to increase the amount of peri-implant attached mucosa: free gingival grafts versus vestibuloplasty. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 5(2):139–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Aroca S, Molnar B, Windisch P, Gera I, Salvi GE, Nikolidakis D, Sculean A (2013) Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 40(7):713–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12112 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Thoma DS, Sancho-Puchades M, Ettlin DA, Hammerle CH, Jung RE (2012) Impact of a collagen matrix on early healing, aesthetics and patient morbidity in oral mucosal wounds—a randomized study in humans. J Clin Periodontol 39(2):157–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01823.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Willershausen I, Barbeck M, Boehm N, Sader R, Willershausen B, Kirkpatrick CJ, Ghanaati S (2014) Non-cross-linked collagen type I/III materials enhance cell proliferation: in vitro and in vivo evidence. J Appl Oral Sci 22(1):29–37. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130316 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Evian CI, al-Maseeh J and Symeonides E (2003) Soft tissue augmentation for implant dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 24:195–8, 200–2, 204–6; quiz 208Google Scholar