Retreatability of three calcium silicate-containing sealers and one epoxy resin-based root canal sealer with four different root canal instruments
- 448 Downloads
The objective of the study was to compare the retreatability of three calcium silicate-containing sealers (BioRoot RCS, MTA Fillapex, Endo C.P.M.) and an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus) with different root canal instruments (Hedström files, Reciproc R40, Mtwo retreatment file R 25/.05 + Mtwo 40/.06, and F6 SkyTaper) concerning sealer remnants and retreatment time.
Materials and methods
Root canals of 192 teeth were instrumented with Reciproc R40. All root canals were obturated using the single-cone technique with Reciproc R40 gutta-percha and one of the sealers (n = 48 per sealer). Two months later, retreatment was performed using one of the mentioned instruments (n = 12 per instrument and sealer). The roots were split longitudinally, and both halves were investigated using light microscopy. The percentage of sealer remnants covering the root canal wall was evaluated using the software ImageJ. The time required for retreatment was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test.
Regarding the percentage of root canal filling remnants as well as retreatment time, two-way ANOVA indicated that the results were significantly affected by the sealer (p < 0.001) and by the instrument used (p < 0.05). Overall, the use of AH Plus was associated with significantly more remnants compared to all other sealers (p < 0.001) and F6 SkyTaper instruments allowed significantly faster retreatment than the other instruments (p < 0.05).
The retreatability of calcium silicate-containing sealers was better compared to AH Plus as less sealer remnants and shorter retreatment times were observed. Retreatment with engine-driven NiTi instruments was superior compared to hand instrumentation.
Engine-driven NiTi instruments are better suited to remove root canal fillings than stainless steel Hedström files.
KeywordsCalcium silicate-containing sealer Epoxy resin-based sealer Retreatment Root canal instruments
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 11.Dammaschke T, Camp JH, Bogen G (2014) MTA in vital pulp therapy. In: Torabinejad M (ed) Mineral trioxide aggregate. Properties and clinical applications. Wiley Blackwell Ames, pp 71-110.Google Scholar
- 26.de Souza PF, Oliveira Goncalves LC, Franco Marques AA, Sponchiado Junior EC, Roberti Garcia LF, de Carvalho FM (2015) Root canal retreatment using reciprocating and continuous rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Eur J Dent 9:234–239. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.156834 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Bramante CM, Fidelis NS, Assumpção TS, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Bramante AS, de Moraes IG (2010) Heat release, time required, and cleaning ability of Mtwo R and ProTaper universal retreatment systems in the removal of filling material. J Endod 36:1870–1873. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Shokouhinejad N, Razmi H, Nekoofar MH, Sajadi S, Dummer PM, Khoshkhounejad M (2013) Push-out bond strength of bioceramic materials in a synthetic tissue fluid. J Dent (Tehran) 10:540–547Google Scholar
- 44.Alves FR, Marceliano-Alves MF, Sousa JC, Silveira SB, Provenzano JC, Siqueira JF Jr (2016) Removal of root canal fillings in curved canals using either reciprocating single- or rotary multi-instrument systems and a supplementary step with the XP-Endo finisher. J Endod 42:1114–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar