Oral rehabilitation with dental implants in irradiated patients: a meta-analysis on implant survival
The aim of this comprehensive literature review is to provide recommendations and guidelines for dental implant therapy in patients with a history of radiation in the head and neck region. For the first time, a meta-analysis comparing the implant survival in irradiated and non-irradiated patients was performed.
Material and methods
An extensive electronic search in the electronic databases of the National Library of Medicine was conducted for articles published between January 1990 and January 2013 to identify literature presenting survival data on the topic of dental implants in patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Review and meta-analysis were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement. For meta-analysis, only studies with a mean follow-up of at least 5 years were included.
After screening 529 abstracts from the electronic database, we included 31 studies in qualitative and 8 in quantitative synthesis. The mean implant survival rate of all examined studies was 83 % (range, 34–100 %). Meta-analysis of the current literature (2007–2013) revealed no statistically significant difference in implant survival between non-irradiated native bone and irradiated native bone (odds ratio [OR], 1.44; confidence interval [CI], 0.67–3.1). In contrast, meta-analysis of the literature of the years 1990–2006 showed a significant difference in implant survival between non-irradiated and irradiated patients ([OR], 2.12; [CI], 1.69–2.65) with a higher implant survival in the non-irradiated bone. Meta-analysis of the implant survival regarding bone origin indicated a statistically significant higher implant survival in the irradiated native bone compared to the irradiated grafted bone ([OR], 1.82; [CI], 1.14–2.90).
Within the limits of this meta-analytic approach to the literature, this study describes for the first time a comparable implant survival in non-irradiated and irradiated native bone in the current literature. Grafted bone combined with radiotherapy was identified as a negative prognostic factor on implant survival.
The evolution of implant hardware and improvement of treatment strategies during the last years have affirmed dental implant-supported concepts as a valuable treatment option for patients with a history of radiation in the head and neck region.
KeywordsDental implants Radiation therapy Oral cancer Survival rate Bone augmentation
- 7.Hobo S, Garcia LT (1989) Osseointegration and occlusal rehabilitation. Quintessence, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- 8.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):e1–e34. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Buddula A, Assad DA, Salinas TJ, Garces YI (2011) Survival of dental implants in native and grafted bone in irradiated head and neck cancer patients: a retrospective analysis. Indian J Dent Res 22(5):644–648Google Scholar
- 16.Korfage A, Schoen PJ, Raghoebar GM, Roodenburg JL, Vissink A, Reintsema H (2010) Benefits of dental implants installed during ablative tumour surgery in oral cancer patients: a prospective 5-year clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 21(9):971–979. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01930.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Klein MO, Grotz KA, Walter C, Wegener J, Wagner W, Al-Nawas B (2009) Functional rehabilitation of mandibular continuity defects using autologous bone and dental implants—prognostic value of bone origin, radiation therapy and implant dimensions. Eur Surg Res 43(3):269–275. doi:10.1159/000229027 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Schoen PJ, Raghoebar GM, Bouma J, Reintsema H, Burlage FR, Roodenburg JL, Vissink A (2008) Prosthodontic rehabilitation of oral function in head-neck cancer patients with dental implants placed simultaneously during ablative tumour surgery: an assessment of treatment outcomes and quality of life. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37(1):8–16. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2007.07.015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Fenlon MR, Lyons A, Farrell S, Bavisha K, Banerjee A, Palmer RM (2012) Factors affecting survival and usefulness of implants placed in vascularized free composite grafts used in post-head and neck cancer reconstruction. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14(2):266–272. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00250.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Mancha de la Plata M, Gias LN, Diez PM, Munoz-Guerra M, Gonzalez-Garcia R, Lee GY, Castrejon-Castrejon S, Rodriguez-Campo FJ (2012) Osseointegrated implant rehabilitation of irradiated oral cancer patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(5):1052–1063. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.032 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Grötz KA, Schmidt BLJ (2013) Onko II: supportive TU-Betreuung. Handbuch MKG Update 1:17–20Google Scholar
- 41.Kao SY, Lui MT, Fong J, Wu DC, Wu CH, Tu HF, Hung KF, Yeung TC (2005) A method using vestibulo-sulcoplasty combining a split-thickness skin graft and a palatal keratinized mucosa graft for peri-implant tissue secondary to oral cancer surgery. J Oral Implantol 31(4):186–191. doi:10.1563/1548-1336(2005)31[186:AMUVCA]2.0.CO;2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Heberer S, Kilic S, Hossamo J, Raguse JD, Nelson K (2011) Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study. Clin Oral Implants Res 22(5):546–551Google Scholar
- 50.Cuesta-Gil M, Ochandiano Caicoya S, Riba-García F, Duarte Ruiz B, Navarro Cuéllar C, Navarro Vila C (2009) Oral rehabilitation with osseointegrated implants in oncologic patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67(11):2485–2496Google Scholar
- 51.Nelson K, Heberer S, Glatzer C (2007) Survival analysis and clinical evaluation of implant-retained prostheses in oral cancer resection patients over a mean follow-up period of 10 years. J Prosthet Dent 98(5):405–410Google Scholar
- 52.Schoen PJ, Raghoebar GM, Bouma J, Reintsema H, Vissink A, Sterk W, Roodenburg JL (2007) Rehabilitation of oral function in head and neck cancer patients after radiotherapy with implant-retained dentures: effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Oral Oncol 43(4):379–388Google Scholar
- 53.Cao Y, Weischer T (2003) Comparison of maxillary implant-supported prosthesis in irradiated and non-irradiated patients. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 23(2):209–212Google Scholar
- 54.Visch LL, van Waas MA, Schmitz PI, Levendag PC (2002) A clinical evaluation of implants in irradiated oral cancer patients. J Dent Res 81(12):856–859Google Scholar
- 55.Betz T, Purps S, Pistner H, Bill J, Reuther J (1999) Oral rehabilitation of tumor patients with enosseous dental implants – success rate taking into account the peri-implant hard and soft tissues. Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir 3(Suppl 1): S99–S105Google Scholar
- 56.Weischer T, Mohr C (1999) Ten-year experience in oral implant rehabilitation of cancer patients: treatment concept and proposed criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14(4):521–528Google Scholar
- 57.Schliephake H, Neukam FW, Schmelzeisen R, Wichmann M (1999) Long-term results of endosteal implants used for restoration of oral function after oncologic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28(4):260–265Google Scholar
- 58.Werkmeister R, Szulczewski D, Walteros-Benz P, Joos U (1999) Rehabilitation with dental implants of oral cancer patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 27(1):38–41Google Scholar
- 59.Niimi A, Ueda M, Keller EE, Worthington P (1998) Experience with osseointegrated implants placed in irradiated tissues in Japan and the United States. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13(3):407–411Google Scholar
- 60.Keller EE, Tolman DE, Zuck SL, Eckert SE (1997) Mandibular endosseous implants and autogenous bone grafting in irradiated tissue: a 10-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12(6):800–813Google Scholar
- 61.Esser E, Wagner W (1997) Dental implants following radical oral cancer surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12(4):552–557Google Scholar