Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT for periodontal lesions
- 805 Downloads
- 21 Citations
Abstract
Objectives
The present study compares the diagnostic value of periodontal bone defect images using conventional two-dimensional single-tooth radiographs and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.
Materials and methods
Classified periodontal bone defects were prepared on pig mandibles and presented radiographically. Fifteen dentists were instructed to make a diagnosis based on these x-rays, regarding the type and the extent of the bone defects. Subsequently, the results were evaluated and compared to the morphology of the surgically prepared defects as the gold standard.
Results
On average, the diagnosis of infrabony defects were 21 %, dehiscence 25 %, and fenestration 33 % more accurate using the three-dimensional projection than with the single-tooth radiograph. Furthermore, the CBCT allows grade II furcation to be captured more accurately.
Conclusions
The results of this study indicate that a considerably more precise analysis of periodontal defects is possible due to the third dimension. Particularly, in the oro-vestibular orientation, defects could be detected significantly more accurate.
Clinical relevance
CBCT images offer an advantageous alternative to the conventional single-tooth radiograph while taking the higher exposure of radiation into account.
Keywords
CBCT Dental radiology Three-dimensional imaging Periodontal disease Bone defectReferences
- 1.Listgarten MA (1980) Periodontal probing: what does it mean? J Clin Periodontol 7:165–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Tyndall D, Rathore S (2008) Cone-beam CT diagnostic applications: caries, periodontal bone assessment, and endodontic applications. Dent Clin North Am 52:825–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Tugnait A, Clerehugh V, Hirschmann PN (2000) The usefulness of radiographs in diagnosis and management of periodontal diseases: a review. J Dent 28:219–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Mol A (2004) Imaging methods in periodontology. Periodontology 2000 2004(34):34–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Jeffcoat MK, Wang IC, Reddy MS (1995) Radiographic diagnosis in periodontics. Periodontology 2000 7:54–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Pihlstrom BL (2001) Periodontal risk assessment, diagnosis and treatment planning. Periodontology 2000 25:37–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Özmeric N, Kostioutchenko I, Hägler G, Frentzen M, Jervøe-Storm PM (2008) Cone-beam computed tomography in assessment of periodontal ligament space: in vitro study on artificial tooth model. Clin Oral Investig 12:233–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Jervøe-Storm PM, Hagner M, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Zöller JE, Jepsen S, Frentzen M (2010) Comparison of cone-beam computerized tomography and intraoral radiographs for determination of the periodontal ligament in a variable phantom. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Nackaerts O; SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium, Willems G (2011) Comparison of 6 cone-beam computed tomography systems for image quality and detection of simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Mol A, Balasundaram A (2008) In vitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:319–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Noujeim M, Prihoda T, Langlais R, Nummikoski P (2009) Evaluation of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography in the detection of simulated interradicular bone lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38:156–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Mengel R, Candir M, Shiratori K, Flores-de-Jacoby L (2005) Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of periodontal defects: an in vitro study on native pig and human mandibles. J Periodontol 76:665–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP (2006) Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements. J Periodontol 77:1261–1266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Yang J (2007) Diagnostic validity (or acuity) of 2D CCD versus 3D CBCT-images for assessing periodontal breakdown. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104:395–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Yang J (2008) Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:252–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Grimard BA, Hoidal MJ, Mills MP, Mellonig JT, Nummikoski PV, Mealey BL (2009) Comparison of clinical, periapical radiograph, and cone-beam volume tomography measurement techniques for assessing bone level changes following regenerative periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 80:48–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Walter C, Kaner D, Berndt DC, Weiger R, Zitzmann NU (2009) Three-dimensional imaging as a pre-operative tool in decision making for furcation surgery. J Clin Periodontol 36:250–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Walter C, Weiger R, Zitzmann NU (2010) Accuracy of three-dimensional imaging in assessing maxillary molar furcation involvement. J Clin Periodontol 37:436–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Walter C, Weiger R, Dietrich T, Lang N, Zitzmann NU (2012) Does three-dimensional imaging offer a financial benefit for treating maxillary molars with furcation involvement? A pilot clinical case series. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:351–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Faria Vasconcelos K, Evangelista KM, Rodrigues CD, Estrela C, de Sousa TO, Silva MAG (2012) Detection of periodontal bone loss using cone beam CT and intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41:64–69PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Fleiner J, Hanning C, Schulze D, Stricker A, Jacobs R (2012) Digital method for quantification of circumferential periodontal bone level using cone beam CT. Clin Oral Investig 17:389–396Google Scholar