Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 1053–1060 | Cite as

Fluoride release and mechanical properties after 1-year water storage of recent restorative glass ionomer cements

  • Maho Shiozawa
  • Hidekazu Takahashi
  • Naohiko Iwasaki
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationships between fluoride release and mechanical properties after 1-year water storage of five recent restorative glass ionomer cements (GICs).

Materials and methods

Five GICs, FujiIX GP EXTRA (FEX), FujiIX GP (FIX), GlasIonomer FX-II (GFX), Ketac Molar Easymix (KME), and Riva Self Cure (RSC), were examined. Cumulative fluoride release, compressive strength, and surface hardness were measured up to 1-year storage (n = 5), and analyzed with one-way or two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (α = 0.05). Elemental compositions before and after 1-year storage were also examined (n = 3).

Results

The amounts of fluoride release were significantly different among the products. The highest amount of fluoride release occurred during the first day. Then, the amount of fluoride release rapidly decreased and still continued until 1-year storage. Compressive strengths indicated that two main factors were significant (GFX < FEX = RSC < FIX < KME; 1 day < 1 week = 1 month = 3 months = 6 months = 1 year), but surface hardness showed a slightly different tendency (GFX = RSC < FEX = FIX = KME; 1 year < 1 day < 1 week = 1 month = 3 months = 6 months). Significant correlation was found between decrease of silicon and decrease rate of the surface hardness.

Conclusions

Fluoride releases were detected up to 1-year storage, but the mechanical properties slightly decreased due to decrease of Si after 1-year storage. Elution of Si instead of fluoride release was considered more critical to deteriorate the mechanical properties of GICs.

Clinical relevance

Fluoride released for 1-year water storage will contribute to secondary caries prevention. The amount of fluoride release did not affect these mechanical properties. These results indicate the usefulness of these GICs.

Keywords

Glass ionomer cement Long-term stability Fluoride release Compressive strength Surface hardness Elemental analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mr. Katsuhito Kato, researcher of GC Corp., for helping the measurement of fluoride release.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Bowen RL, Marjenhoff WA (1992) Dental composites/glass ionomers: the materials. Adv Dent Res 6:44–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nicholson JW (1998) Chemistry of glass-ionomer cements: a review. Biomaterials 19:485–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sidhu SK (2011) Glass-ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject? Aust Dent J 56(Suppl 1):23–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, Peutzfeldt A, van Dijken JW (2002) Hardness and in vitro wear of a novel ceramic restorative cement. Eur J Oral Sci 110:175–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guggenberger R, May R, Stefan KP (1998) New trends in glass-ionomer chemistry. Biomaterials 19:479–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCabe JF (1998) Resin-modified glass-ionomers. Biomaterials 19:521–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saito S, Tosaki S, Hirota K (1999) Characteristics of glass-ionomer cements. In: Davidson CL, Mjör IA (ed) Advances in Glass-Ionomer Cements. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, Carol Stream, pp 18–27Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nicholson JW, Croll TP (1997) Glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry. Quintessence Int 28:705–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frencken JE (2010) The ART approach using glass-ionomers in relation to global oral health care. Dent Mater 26:1–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McKenzie MA, Linden RW, Nicholson JW (2003) The physical properties of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer dental cements stored in saliva, proprietary acidic beverages, saline and water. Biomaterials 24:4063–4069PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mckenzie MA, Linden RW, Nicholson JW (2003) The effect of saliva on surface hardness and water sorption of glass-ionomers and “compomers”. J Mater Sci Mater Med 14:869–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Okada K, Tosaki S, Hirota K, Hume WR (2001) Surface hardness change of restorative filling materials stored in saliva. Dent Mater 17:34–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levallois B, Fovet Y, Lapeyre L, Gal JY (1998) In vitro fluoride release from restorative materials in water versus artificial saliva medium (SAGF). Dent Mater 14:441–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Clark HE (1984) Long-term F release from glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 63:158–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T (2007) Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater 23:343–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ellakuria J, Triana R, Mínguez N, Soler I, Ibaseta G, Maza J, García-Godoy F (2003) Effect of one-year water storage on the surface microhardness of resin-modified versus conventional glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 19:286–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zanata RL, Magalhães AC, Lauris JR, Atta MT, Wang L, Navarro MF (2011) Microhardness and chemical analysis of high-viscous glass-ionomer cement after 10 years of clinical service as ART restorations. J Dent 39:834–840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Moor RJ, Verbeeck RM (1998) Changes in surface hardness of conventional restorative glass ionomer cements. Biomaterials 19:2269–2275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Forss H (1993) Release of fluoride and other elements from light-cured glass lonomers in neutral and acidic conditions. J Dent Res 72:1257–1262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maho Shiozawa
    • 1
  • Hidekazu Takahashi
    • 2
  • Naohiko Iwasaki
    • 2
  1. 1.Advanced Biomaterials, Department of Restorative Sciences, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate SchoolTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Oral Biomaterials Engineering, Course of Oral Health Engineering, School of Oral Health Care Sciences, Faculty of DentistryTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations