Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 729–736 | Cite as

Effect of sonic application mode on the resin–dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified self-etch adhesive

  • Alexandra Mena-SerranoEmail author
  • Eugenio Jose Garcia
  • Alessandro Dourado Loguercio
  • Alessandra Reis
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the effect of different application modes on the immediate and 6-month resin–dentin bond strength (μTBS) and nanoleakage in the hybrid and adhesive layers.

Materials and methods

Three 1-step self-etch adhesives (One Coat 7.0 (OC), Clearfil S3 Bond (CS), and FuturaBond NR (FB)) were applied on a flat superficial dentin surface of 30 human molars under manual mode or sonic vibration at a frequency of 170 Hz (SV). Composite build-ups were constructed incrementally; specimens were sectioned to obtain resin–dentin sticks with cross-sectional area of 0.8 mm2 and tested in tension (0.5 mm/min) immediately (IM) or after 6 months (6M) of water storage. Two bonded sticks, from each tooth at each storage time, were immersed in a silver nitrate solution, photo-developed, and analyzed under scanning electron microscopy. The amount of nanoleakage was measured using the ImageTool 3.0 software. Data, from each adhesive, were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05).

Results

OC and CS showed higher μTBS and lower nanoleakage in the IM period when applied with SV groups. For FB, no significant difference was observed between the two modes of application. All materials showed lower nanoleakage in the SV groups. Higher nanoleakage was observed after 6M for OC and FB.

Conclusions

The sonic application mode at an oscillating frequency of 170 Hz can improve the resin–dentin μTBS, reduce the nanoleakage, and retard the degradation of the resin–dentin μTBS of Clearfil S3 Bond and One Coat 7.0 adhesives.

Clinical significance

Sonic application mode at an oscillating frequency of 170 Hz can be helpful and easy to use in dental practice to guaranty long-lasting restorations.

Keywords

Tensile strength Dentin-bonding agents Dentin Dental restoration Permanent 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was performed by Alexandra Mena Serrana as partial fulfillment of her MS degree at the State University of Ponta Grossa.

Conflict of interests

A. Reis and A. D. Loguercio are involved in the development of the sonic device employed in this study.

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(WMV 8534 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tay FR, Pashley DH (2003) Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc 69:726–731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perdigao J, Dutra-Correa M, Castilhos N, Carmo AR, Anauate-Netto C, Cordeiro HJ, Amore R, Lewgoy HR (2007) One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations. Am J Dent 20:125–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 21:864–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sarr M, Kane AW, Vreven J, Mine A, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J (2010) Microtensile bond strength and interfacial characterization of 11 contemporary adhesives bonded to bur-cut dentin. Oper Dent 35:94–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heintze SD, Ruffieux C, Rousson V (2010) Clinical performance of cervical restorations–a meta-analysis. Dent Mater 26:993–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pashley EL, Zhang Y, Lockwood PE, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH (1998) Effects of HEMA on water evaporation from water-HEMA mixtures. Dent Mater 14:6–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, Svizero N, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu CK, Carrilho MR (2006) Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater 22:973–980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gamborgi GP, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2007) Influence of enamel border and regional variability on durability of resin–dentin bonds. J Dent 35:371–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Osorio R, Pisani-Proenca J, Erhardt MC, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Tay FR, Toledano M (2008) Resistance of ten contemporary adhesives to resin–dentine bond degradation. J Dent 36:163–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M (2001) "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives—a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 17:373–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2002) Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 30:83–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakaoki Y, Sasakawa W, Horiuchi S, Nagano F, Ikeda T, Tanaka T, Inoue S, Uno S, Sano H, Sidhu SK (2005) Effect of double-application of all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Dent 33:765–772PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2008) Effect of double-application or the application of a hydrophobic layer for improved efficacy of one-step self-etch systems in enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 33:564–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Hashimoto M, Ito S, Brackett WW, García-Godoy F, Sunico M (2005) Conversion of one-step to two-step self-etch adhesives for improved efficacy and extended application. Am J Dent 18:126–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2006) Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive. Dent Mater 22:533–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reis A, Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, Bauer JR, Grande RH, Klein-Junior CA, Baumhardt-Neto R, Loguercio AD (2008) Can the durability of one-step self-etch adhesives be improved by double application or by an extra layer of hydrophobic resin? J Dent 36:309–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Sauro S, Tay FR, Di Lenarda R, Prati C, Biasotto M, Contardo L, Breschi L (2005) Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 113:525–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Velasquez LM, Sergent RS, Burgess JO, Mercante DE (2006) Effect of placement agitation and placement time on the shear bond strength of 3 self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent 31:426–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chan KM, Tay FR, King NM, Imazato S, Pashley DH (2003) Bonding of mild self-etching primers/adhesives to dentin with thick smear layers. Am J Dent 16:340–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Do Amaral RC, Stanislawczuk R, Zander-Grande C, Michel MD, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2009) Active application improves the bonding performance of self-etch adhesives to dentin. J Dent 37:82–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Do Amaral RC, Stanislawczuk R, Zander-Grande C, Gagler D, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2010) Bond strength and quality of the hybrid layer of one-step self-etch adhesives applied with agitation on dentin. Oper Dent 35:211–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Loguercio AD, Stanislawczuk R, Mena-Serrano A, Reis A (2011) Effect of 3-year water storage on the performance of one-step self-etch adhesives applied actively on dentine. J Dent 39:578–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Loguercio AD, Raffo J, Bassani F, Balestrini H, Santo D, Do Amaral RC, Reis A (2011) 24-month clinical evaluation in non-carious cervical lesions of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive applied using a rubbing motion. Clin Oral Investig 15:589–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Pashley DH, Pasquantonio G, Ruggeri A, Suppa P, Mazzotti G, Di Lenarda R, Tay FR (2006) Electric-current-assisted application of self-etch adhesives to dentin. J Dent Res 85:1092–1096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Visintini E, Mazzoni A, Vita F, Pasquantonio G, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, Breschi L (2008) Effects of thermocycling and use of ElectroBond on microtensile strength and nanoleakage using commercial one-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 116:564–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Finger WJ, Tani C (2005) Effect of application mode on bonding performance of self-etching adhesives. Am J Dent 18:41–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bagis B, Turkarslan S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Uctasli S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV (2008) Effect of ultrasonic agitation on bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 10:441–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bagis B, Turkaslan S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV (2009) Effect of high frequency ultrasonic agitation on the bond strength of self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 11:369–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harris FJ (1978) On the use of Windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete fourier transform. Proc IEEE 66:51–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tay FR, King NM, Chan KM, Pashley DH (2002) How can nanoleakage occur in self-etching adhesive systems that demineralize and infiltrate simultaneously? J Adhes Dent 4:255–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Montgomery DC (2009) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Miyazaki M, Platt JA, Onose H, Moore BK (1996) Influence of dentin primer application methods on dentin bond strength. Oper Dent 21:167–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dal-Bianco K, Pellizzaro A, Patzlaft R, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2006) Effects of moisture degree and rubbing action on the immediate resin–dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 22:1150–1156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Reis A, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Gones OM, Patzlaff R, Loguercio AD (2007) Impact of adhesive application to wet and dry dentin on long-term resin–dentin bond strengths. Oper Dent 32:380–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lea SC, Walmsley AD (2009) Mechano-physical and biophysical properties of power-driven scalers: driving the future of powered instrument design and evaluation. Periodontol 2000 51:63–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Violich DR, Chandler NP (2010) The smear layer in endodontics—a review. Int Endod J 43:2–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sapna N, Vandana KN (2010) Ultrasound in periodontics. IJDA 2:274–277Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR (2007) Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 40:415–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee J, Jang KT, Kim JW, Lee SH, Hahn SH, Kim CC (2003) Effect of ultrasonic vibration on dentin bond strength and resin infiltration. Am J Dent 16:404–408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Arabaci T, Cicek Y, Canakci CF (2007) Sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontal treatment: a review. Int J Dent Hyg 5:2–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hass V, Folkuenig MS, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2011) Influence of adhesive properties on resin–dentin bond strength of one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 13:417–424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A (2002) Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 30:371–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Hiraishi N, Yiu CK (2005) Water treeing in simplified dentin adhesives—deja vu? Oper Dent 30:561–579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sano H, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, Burrow MF, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH (1995) Comparative SEM and TEM observations of nanoleakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 20:160–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fabre HS, Fabre S, Cefaly DF, de Oliveira Carrilho MR, Garcia FC, Wang L (2007) Water sorption and solubility of dentin bonding agents light-cured with different light sources. J Dent 35:253–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Yoshiyama M, Saito T, Brackett WW, Waller JL, Pashley DH (2005) Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent 7:133–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yiu CK, King NM, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Carrilho MR, Tay FR (2004) Effect of resin hydrophilicity and water storage on resin strength. Biomaterials 25:5789–5796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Soles C, Yee A (2000) A discussion of the molecular mechanisms of moisture transport in epoxy resins. J Polym Sci B Polym 38:792–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ikeda T, De Munck J, Shirai K, Hikita K, Inoue S, Sano H, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Effect of evaporation of primer components on ultimate tensile strengths of primer–adhesive mixture. Dent Mater 21:1051–1058PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra Mena-Serrano
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eugenio Jose Garcia
    • 2
  • Alessandro Dourado Loguercio
    • 1
  • Alessandra Reis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of DentistryState University of Ponta GrossaPonta GrossaBrazil
  2. 2.São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations