Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 589–598 | Cite as

Comparison of the effect of two sugar-substituted chewing gums on different caries- and gingivitis-related variables: a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial

  • María C. Martínez-Pabón
  • Lucas Duque-Agudelo
  • Juan D. Díaz-Gil
  • Diana M. Isaza-Guzmán
  • Sergio I. Tobón-ArroyaveEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two sugar-substituted chewing gums besides toothbrushing on different clinical, microbiological, and biochemical caries- and gingivitis-related variables.

Materials and methods

The study was designed as a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial with three parallel arms. A total of 130 dental students, who volunteered after signing an informed consent, were randomly allocated to receive one of the following interventions: hexitol-sweetened gum containing casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), pentitol-sweetened gum containing no CPP-ACP, and control group with no gum. Subjects within the experimental groups chewed two gum pellets for 20 min three times a day after meals. The daily consumption level of both polyols was 6.0 g. Clinical examinations and salivary samplings were conducted at baseline and after 30 days of gum use. Pre- and post-intervention stimulated whole saliva samples were quantified for calcium/phosphate ionic concentration, total facultative bacterial load, Streptococcus mutans/Lactobacillus spp. counts, and Gram-negative percentage.

Results

A statistically significant reduction in visible plaque score was displayed in the hexitol/CPP-ACP gum group after the intervention when compared with baseline, but the order of the effect was in the same order as the differences between the groups at baseline. A similar tendency was seen in both the pentitol/non-CPP-ACP gum and control groups regarding total salivary facultative bacterial load and S. mutans count, but median values of these parameters were more significantly reduced in the pentitol/non-CPP-ACP gum group in comparison with those of the control group. Alterations of salivary Lactobacillus spp. were demonstrated only in the pentitol/non-CPP-ACP gum group.

Conclusion

Although these findings might indicate that a 30-day protocol of daily chewing of pentitol-sweetened gum containing no CPP-ACP might have some a reducing effect on the salivary levels of facultative bacteria, S. mutans and Lactobacillus spp., there was only a marginal, if any, benefit from the chewing gums under study on some microbiological caries- and gingivitis-related variables.

Clinical relevance

Taking into account that for transferring results into clinically relevant conclusions the findings need to be strong and consistent, adhering to single significant differences appears not appropriate. Hence, the clinical significance of chewing gums as an adjunctive tool for daily oral care remained questionable.

Keywords

Caries Casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate Gingivitis Sugar-substituted chewing gums Polyols Saliva 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Prof. Jaime A. Cury, from the Universidade Estadual de Campinas, UNICAMP, Brazil, for his assistance on the spectrophotometric determination of calcium and phosphate ionic concentrations. This study has been fully supported by a grant from the Research Development Committee of the University of Antioquia (CODI-Code 8700-678).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no financial interest in the products in this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB (2007) Dental caries. Lancet 369:51–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campus G, Cagetti MG, Cocco F, Sale S, Sacco G, Strohmenger L, Lingström P (2011) Effect of a sugar-free chewing gum containing magnolia bark extract on different variables related to caries and gingivitis: a randomized controlled intervention trial. Caries Res 45:393–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kakodkar P, Mulay S (2010) Effect of sugar-free gum in addition to tooth brushing on dental plaque and interdental debris. Dent Res J 7:64–69Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnes VM, Santarpia P, Richter R, Curtis J, Xu T (2005) Clinical evaluation of the anti-plaque effect of a commercial chewing gum. J Clin Dent 16:1–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burt BA (2006) The use of sorbitol- and xylitol-sweetened chewing gum in caries control. J Am Dent Assoc 137:190–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Loveren C (2004) Sugar alcohols: what is the evidence for caries-preventive and caries-therapeutic effects. Caries Res 38:286–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holgerson PL, Sjöström I, Stecksén-Blicks C, Twetman S (2007) Dental plaque formation and salivary mutans streptococci in schoolchildren after use of xylitol-containing chewing gum. Int J Paediatr Dent 17:79–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mäkinen KK, Hujoel PP, Bennett CA, Isokangas P, Isotupa K, Pape HR Jr, Mäkinen PL (1998) A descriptive report of the effects of a 16-month xylitol chewing-gum programme subsequent to a 40-month sucrose gum programme. Caries Res 32:107–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mäkinen KK, Isokangas P (1988) Relationship between carbohydrate sweeteners and oral diseases. Prog Food Nutr Sci 12:73–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morgan MV, Adams GG, Bailey DL, Tsao CE, Fischman SL, Reynolds EC (2008) The anticariogenic effect of sugar-free gum containing CPP-ACP nanocomplexes on approximal caries determined using digital bitewing radiography. Caries Res 42:171–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reynolds EC, Cai F, Shen P, Walker GD (2003) Retention in plaque and remineralization of enamel lesions by various forms of calcium in a mouthrinse or sugar-free chewing gum. J Dent Res 82:206–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iijima Y, Cai F, Shen P, Walker G, Reynolds C, Reynolds EC (2004) Acid resistance of enamel subsurface lesions remineralized by a sugar-free chewing gum containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate. Caries Res 38:551–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cross KJ, Huq NL, Palamara JE, Perich JW, Reynolds EC (2005) Physicochemical characterization of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate nanocomplexes. J Biol Chem 280:15362–15369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cai F, Shen P, Walker GD, Reynolds C, Yuan Y, Reynolds EC (2009) Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions by chewing gum with added calcium. J Dent 37:763–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mickenautsch S, Leal SC, Yengopal V, Bezerra AC, Cruvinel V (2007) Sugar-free chewing gum and dental caries: a systematic review. J Appl Oral Sci 15:83–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Azarpazhooh A, Limeback H (2008) Clinical efficacy of casein derivatives: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Dent Assoc 139:915–924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deshpande A, Jadad AR (2008) The impact of polyol-containing chewing gums on dental caries: a systematic review of original randomized controlled trials and observational studies. J Am Dent Assoc 139:1602–1614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yengopal V, Mickenautsch S (2009) Caries preventive effect of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP): a meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand 67:321–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leblebicioglu B, Kulekci G, Ciftci S, Keskin F, Badur S (2009) Salivary detection of periodontopathic bacteria and periodontal health status in dental students. Anaerobe 15:82–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gonçalves Lda R, Soares MR, Nogueira FC, Garcia CH, Camisasca DR, Domont G, Feitosa AC, Pereira DA, Zingali RB, Alves G (2011) Analysis of the salivary proteome in gingivitis patients. J Periodontal Res 46:599–606PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee A, Ghaname CB, Braun TM, Sugai JV, Teles RP, Loesche WJ, Kornman KS, Giannobile WV, Kinney JS (2012) Bacterial and salivary biomarkers predict the gingival inflammatory profile. J Periodontol 83:79–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lenander-Lumikari M, Loimaranta V (2000) Saliva and dental caries. Adv Dent Res 14:40–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hara AT, Zero DT (2010) The caries environment: saliva, pellicle, diet, and hard tissue ultrastructure. Dent Clin North Am 54:455–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hong X, Hu DY (2010) Salivary Streptococcus mutans level: value in caries prediction for 11-12-year-old children. Community Dent Health 27:248–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gao XL, Seneviratne CJ, Lo EC, Chu CH, Samaranayake LP (2011) Novel and conventional assays in determining abundance of Streptococcus mutans in saliva. Int J Paediatr Dent 22(5):363–368. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01207.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Luo A, Yang D, Xin B, Paster B, Qin J (2012) Microbial profiles in saliva from children with and without caries in mixed dentition. Oral Dis 18(6):595–601. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2012.01915.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, Pitts NB (2007) The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 35:170–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baelum V, Hintze H, Wenzel A, Danielsen B, Nyvad B (2012) Implications of caries diagnostic strategies for clinical management decisions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 40:257–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    European Food Safety Authority (2010) Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to sugar-free chewing gum and reduction of tooth demineralisation which reduces the risk of dental caries pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA Journal 8:1775Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Löe H, Silness J (1963) Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 21:533–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ainamo J, Bay I (1975) Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J 25:229–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I (1970) Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. J Periodontol 41:41–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Smith HG Jr, Bauer PJ (1979) Light-induced permeability changes in sonicated bovine disks: arsenazo III and flow system measurements. Biochemistry 18:5067–5073PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fiske CM, Subbarow Y (1925) The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. J Biol Chem 66:375–400Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hannig M, Hannig C (2010) Nanomaterials in preventive dentistry. Nat Nanotechnol 5:565–569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hanham A, Addy M (2001) The effect of chewing sugar-free gum on plaque regrowth at smooth and occlusal surfaces. J Clin Periodontol 28:255–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Steinberg LM, Odusola F, Mandel ID (1992) Remineralizing potential, antiplaque and anti-gingivitis effects of xylitol and sorbitol sweetened chewing gum. Clin Prev Dent 14:31–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Addy M (1995) Evaluation of clinical trials of agents and procedures to prevent caries and periodontal disease: choosing products and recommending procedures. Int Dent J 45:185–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Addy M, Perriam E, Sterry A (1982) Effects of sugared and sugar-free chewing gum on the accumulation of plaque and debris on the teeth. J Clin Periodontol 9:346–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pizzo G, Licata ME, La Cara M, Pizzo I, Guiglia R, Melilli D (2007) The effects of sugar-free chewing gums on dental plaque regrowth: a comparative study. J Dent 35:503–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rose RK (2000) Binding characteristics of Streptococcus mutans for calcium and casein phosphopeptide. Caries Res 34:427–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cross KJ, Huq NL, Reynolds EC (2007) Casein phosphopeptides in oral health—chemistry and clinical applications. Curr Pharm Des 13:793–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mäkinen KK, Alanen P, Isokangas P, Isotupa K, Söderling E, Mäkinen PL, Wenhui W, Weijian W, Xiaochi C, Yi W, Boxue Z (2008) Thirty-nine-month xylitol chewing-gum programme in initially 8-year-old school children: a feasibility study focusing on mutans streptococci and lactobacilli. Int Dent J 58:41–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dawes C, Macpherson LM (1992) Effects of nine different chewing-gums and lozenges on salivary flow rate and pH. Caries Res 26:176–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ribelles Llop M, Guinot Jimeno F, Mayné Acién R, Bellet Dalmau LJ (2010) Effect of xylitol chewing gum on salivary flow rate, pH, buffering capacity and presence of Streptococcus mutans in saliva. Eur J Peadiatric Dent 11:9–14Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dawes C, Dong C (1995) The flow rate and electrolyte composition of whole saliva elicited by the use of sucrose-containing and sugar-free chewing-gums. Arch Oral Biol 40:699–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tenovuo J, Mansson-Rahemtulla B, Pruitt KM, Arnold R (1981) Inhibition of dental plaque acid production by the salivary peroxidase system. Infect Immun 34:208–214PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ashley FP, Wilson RF (1977) The relation between dietary sugar experience and the quantity and biochemical composition of dental plaque in man. Arch Oral Biol 22:409–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Brambilla E, Twetman S, Felloni A, Cagetti MG, Canegallo L, Garcia-Godoy F, Strohmenger L (1999) Salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in 9- and 13-year-old Italian schoolchildren and the relation to oral health. Clin Oral Investig 3:7–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Giacaman RA, Araneda E, Padilla C (2010) Association between biofilm-forming isolates of mutans streptococci and caries experience in adults. Arch Oral Biol 55:550–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Marcotte H, Lavoie MC (1998) Oral microbial ecology and the role of salivary immunoglobulin A. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:71–109PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mäkinen KK, Chen CY, Mäkinen PL, Bennett CA, Isokangas PJ, Isotupa KP, Pape HR Jr (1996) Properties of whole saliva and dental plaque in relation to 40-month consumption of chewing gums containing xylitol, sorbitol of sucrose. Caries Res 30:180–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mäkinen KK, Saag M, Isotupa KP, Olak J, Nõmmela R, Söderling E, Mäkinen PL (2005) Similarity of the effects of erythritol and xylitol on some risk factors of dental caries. Caries Res 39:207–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Isotupa KP, Gunn S, Chen CY, Lopatin D, Mäkinen KK (1995) Effect of polyol gums on dental plaque in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107:497–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mäkinen KK (2011) Sugar alcohol sweeteners as alternatives to sugar with special consideration of xylitol. Med Princ Pract 20:303–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • María C. Martínez-Pabón
    • 1
  • Lucas Duque-Agudelo
    • 1
  • Juan D. Díaz-Gil
    • 1
  • Diana M. Isaza-Guzmán
    • 1
  • Sergio I. Tobón-Arroyave
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.POPCAD Research Group, Laboratory of Immunodetection and Bioanalysis, Faculty of DentistryUniversity of AntioquiaMedellínColombia

Personalised recommendations