Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of horizontal root fractures: an in vitro study
- First Online:
- 718 Downloads
This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two different cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) units with several intraoral radiography techniques for detecting horizontal root fractures.
The study material comprised 82 extracted human maxillary incisors without root fractures that had not undergone any root canal treatment. Root fractures were created in the horizontal plane in 31 teeth by a mechanical force using a hammer with the tooth placed on a soft foundation as described in a previous study. The teeth were divided into two groups: a control group with no fractures and a test group with fractures. These were randomized to the empty maxillary anterior sockets of a dry human maxilla. Each tooth was imaged at various vertical angles using each of the following modalities: a 3D Accuitomo 170 CBCT, a NewTom 3G CBCT, a VistaScan PSP, a CCD sensor, and conventional film. Specificity and sensitivity for assessing horizontal root fracture by each radiographic technique were calculated. Chi-square statistics were used to evaluate differences between modalities. Kappa statistics assessed the agreement between observers. Results were considered significant at P < 0.05.
The kappa values for inter-observer agreement between observers ranged between 0.88 and 0.98 for the 3D Accuitomo 170, 0.82 and 0.91 for the NewTom 3G, and 0.61 and 0.72 for the different types of intraoral images. The diagnostic accuracy for detecting fracture lines in 3D Accuitomo 170 (0.93) was significantly higher than NewTom 3G (0.87), VistaScan (0.71), CCD (0.70), and CF (0.68).
3D Accuitomo 170 has the highest sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for detecting horizontal root fracture among the 5 radiographic modalities examined. CBCT should be considered as the most reliable imaging modality of choice for the diagnosis of horizontal root fracture.
CBCT imaging offers the clear advantage over conventional imaging that traumatized teeth can be visualized in all three dimensions—especially the oro-facial dimension
KeywordsCone-beam computed tomography Horizontal root fracture Diagnosis Root fractures
- 12.Andreasen FM, Andreasen JO (1994) Root fractures. In: Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM (eds) Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth, 3rd edn. Munsksgaard, Copenhagen, pp 279–311Google Scholar
- 24.Costa FF, Gaia BF, Umetsubo OS, Pinheiro LR, Tortamano IP, Cavalcanti MG (2012) Use of large-volume cone-beam computed tomography in identification and localization of horizontal root fracture in the presence and absence of intracanal metallic post. J Endod 38:856–859. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Scarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, Farman AG (2009) Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Int J Dent 634567. doi:10.1155/2009/634567
- 26.Iikubo M, Kobayashi K, Mishima A, Shimoda S, Daimaruya T, Igarashi C, Imanaka M, Yuasa M, Sakamoto M, Sasano T (2009) Accuracy of intraoral radiography, multidetector helical CT, and limited cone-beam CT for the detection of horizontal tooth root fracture. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108:e70–e74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram MI, Al Faleh W, Al-Khader M, Al-Sadhan R (2012) The validity of different display monitors in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions in cone beam computed tomography images. Acta Odontol Scand. Nov 21. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 33.National Radiological Protection Board. Occupational, Public and Medical Exposure. Documents of the NRPB. Didcot, UK: NRPB, 1993; 4.Google Scholar