Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 17, Issue 9, pp 2127–2137 | Cite as

Light curing through glass ceramics with a second- and a third-generation LED curing unit: effect of curing mode on the degree of conversion of dual-curing resin cements

  • Simon FluryEmail author
  • Adrian Lussi
  • Reinhard Hickel
  • Nicoleta Ilie
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to measure the degree of conversion (DC) of five dual-curing resin cements after different curing modes with a second- and a third-generation light-emitting diode (LED) curing unit. Additionally, irradiance of both light curing units was measured at increasing distances and through discs of two glass ceramics for computer-aided design/manufacturing (CAD/CAM).

Materials and methods

Irradiance and spectra of the Elipar FreeLight 2 (Standard Mode (SM)) and of the VALO light curing unit (High Power Mode (HPM) and Xtra Power Mode (XPM)) were measured with a MARC radiometer. Irradiance was measured at increasing distances (control) and through discs (1.5 to 6 mm thickness) of IPS Empress CAD and IPS e.max CAD. DC of Panavia F2.0, RelyX Unicem 2 Automix, SpeedCEM, BisCem, and BeautiCem SA was measured with an attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared spectrometer when self-cured (negative control) or light cured in SM for 40 s, HPM for 32 s, or XPM for 18 s. Light curing was performed directly (positive control) or through discs of either 1.5- or 3-mm thickness of IPS Empress CAD or IPS e.max CAD. DC was analysed with Kruskal–Wallis tests followed by pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum tests (α = 0.05).

Results

Maximum irradiances were 1,545 mW/cm2 (SM), 2,179 mW/cm2 (HPM), and 4,156 mW/cm2 (XPM), and all irradiances decreased by >80 % through discs of 1.5 mm, ≥95 % through 3 mm, and up to >99 % through 6 mm. Generally, self-curing resulted in the lowest DC. For some cements, direct light curing did not result in higher DC compared to when light cured through ceramic discs. For other cements, light curing through ceramic discs of 3 mm generally reduced DC.

Conclusions

Light curing was favourable for dual-curing cements. Some cements were more susceptible to variations in curing mode than others.

Clinical relevance

When light curing a given cement, the higher irradiances of the third-generation LED curing unit resulted in similar DC compared to the second-generation one, though at shorter light curing times.

Keywords

Luting resins Polymerization Light intensity Curing light Radiant exposure Degree of cure 

Notes

Acknowledgments

S. Flury was supported by a grant (grant number: PB BEP3_136565) of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF, www.snf.ch). Furthermore, we thank S. Hayoz and Prof. Dr. J. Hüsler, Institute of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Bern, for statistical analyses as well as Dr. A. Peutzfeldt for the scientific commentaries on the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or non-financial.

References

  1. 1.
    Fasbinder DJ, Dennison JB, Heys D, Neiva G (2010) A clinical evaluation of chairside lithium disilicate CAD/CAM crowns: a two-year report. J Am Dent Assoc 141(Suppl 2):10S–14SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frankenberger R, Taschner M, Garcia-Godoy F, Petschelt A, Krämer N (2008) Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years. J Adhes Dent 10:393–398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fasbinder DJ (2006) Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 137(Suppl):22S–31SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M (2008) Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 10:251–258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Dijken JW (2003) Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and self-cured resin composite luted ceramic inlays. A 5-year clinical evaluation. Dent Mater 19:670–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Dijken JW, Höglund-Aberg C, Olofsson AL (1998) Fired ceramic inlays: a 6-year follow up. J Dent 26:219–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ilie N, Simon A (2012) Effect of curing mode on the micro-mechanical properties of dual-cured self-adhesive resin cements. Clin Oral Investig 16:505–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flury S, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A (2011) The effect of polymerization procedure on Vickers hardness of dual-curing resin cements. Am J Dent 24:226–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vrochari AD, Eliades G, Hellwig E, Wrbas KT (2009) Curing efficiency of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 25:1104–1108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Janda R, Roulet JF, Latta M, Kaminsky M, Rüttermann S (2007) Effect of exponential polymerization on color stability of resin-based filling materials. Dent Mater 23:696–704Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC, Condon JR, Todd R (1997) Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res 76:1508–1516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sideridou ID, Achilias DS (2005) Elution study of unreacted Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, UDMA, and Bis-EMA from light-cured dental resins and resin composites using HPLC. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 74:617–626PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caughman WF, Caughman GB, Shiflett RA, Rueggeberg F, Schuster GS (1991) Correlation of cytotoxicity, filler loading and curing time of dental composites. Biomaterials 12:737–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kilinc E, Antonson SA, Hardigan PC, Kesercioglu A (2011) The effect of ceramic restoration shade and thickness on the polymerization of light- and dual-cure resin cements. Oper Dent 36:661–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koch A, Kroeger M, Hartung M, Manetsberger I, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Friedl KH (2007) Influence of ceramic translucency on curing efficacy of different light curing units. J Adhes Dent 9:449–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jung H, Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Furch H, Bernhart S, Schmalz G (2006) Polymerization efficiency of different photocuring units through ceramic discs. Oper Dent 31:68–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hadis M, Leprince JG, Shortall AC, Devaux J, Leloup G, Palin WM (2011) High irradiance curing and anomalies of exposure reciprocity law in resin-based materials. J Dent 39:549–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Halvorson RH, Erickson RL, Davidson CL (2002) Energy dependent polymerization of resin-based composite. Dent Mater 18:463–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Musanje L, Darvell BW (2003) Polymerization of resin composite restorative materials: exposure reciprocity. Dent Mater 19:531–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nomoto R, Uchida K, Hirasawa T (1994) Effect of light intensity on polymerization of light-cured composite resins. Dent Mater J 13:198–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rueggeberg FA (2011) State-of-the-art: dental photocuring—a review. Dent Mater 27:39–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brunner E, Munzel U (2002) Nichtparametrische Datenanalyse (in German). Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Price RB, Felix CM, Whalen JM (2010) Factors affecting the energy delivered to simulated class I and class V preparations. J Can Dent Assoc 76:a94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ilie N, Hickel R (2008) Correlation between ceramics translucency and polymerization efficiency through ceramics. Dent Mater 24:908–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK (2007) Degree of conversion of dual-cure luting resins light-polymerized through various materials. Acta Odontol Scand 65:201–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Faria-e-Silva AL, Moraes RR, Ogliari FA, Piva E, Martins LR (2009) Panavia F: the role of the primer. J Oral Sci 51:255–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Emami N, Söderholm KJ (2003) How light irradiance and curing time affect monomer conversion in light-cured resin composites. Eur J Oral Sci 111:536–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A (2005) Polymerization contraction of resin composite vs. energy and power density of light-cure. Eur J Oral Sci 113:417–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E (2005) Resin composite properties and energy density of light cure. J Dent Res 84:659–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Flury
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adrian Lussi
    • 1
  • Reinhard Hickel
    • 2
  • Nicoleta Ilie
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental MedicineUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Restorative DentistryDental School of the Ludwig-Maximilians-UniversityMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations