Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 17, Supplement 1, pp 61–62 | Cite as

What are the unmet needs in the dental office/at home to treat dentin hypersensitivity?

  • Karl Glockner
Open Access
Short Communication

Keywords

Dentin hypersensitivity Etiology Diagnosis Therapy 

Oral discomfort due to tooth hypersensitivity is a common occurrence and a frequent reason why patients visit their dentists. Epidemiological oral studies demonstrated that in populations of 18–65 years old patients, 40–60 % have signs of hypersensitivity. Tooth hypersensitivity manifests itself clinically as a painful tooth reaction to sensory stimulus because of a loss of tooth hard tissue. This loss may be a reason of cracked enamel, tooth decay, non-carious lesions as well as tooth neck or root exposure as a result of periodontal diseases and therapy [1].

The successful management of dentin hypersensitivity is a very challenging treatment for dental professionals. The intensity can range between the different patients and is referred to the subjective perception. The temperature sensitivity assessment by cold air and the pain expression by a VAS scale are very subjective measurements that vary from patient to patient. Some approaches for objectification of the pain are the tactile hypersensitivity measurement with the Yeaple probe and the electrical stimulus sensitivity assessment with the Vitality scanner [2].

The caries-preventive benefits of fluoride are well-known established and proofed for decades [3]. Fluoride does some prevention to demineralization, controls remineralisation, promotes wear resistance, interferes with microbiology, reduces hypersensitivity, interferes directly with the biofilm and changes acid resistance in biofilm. Fluoride works for everyone independent of age [4].

The upgoing stairway of therapy starts at non-invasive tooth pastes to mouthrinses to topical agents and ends at invasive therapy like resins or that leads to endodontics if an irreversible pulpitis occurs. Additional possible local treatments are a desensitisation by the Er:YAG laser or application of ozone.

For immediate release of sensations concerning exposed dental necks and hypersensitivity, the topic application of desensitising materials is of big interest. Recommendations for daily treatments in the dental offices are the use of solutions containing fluorides, varnishes with solvents and dentin bonding agents. Recommendations for home treatments are use of non-abrasive desensitising tooth pastes and rinsing solutions, habits change and patient’s education to smart brushing with soft toothbrushes. So, more brushing should mean less caries, but not more erosions as Patrick Schmidlin mentioned.

One problem mentioned by Lars Petersson is the lack of efficient products which suit for elderly and mouth-dried patients. On the market, available toothpastes are not tolerated by mouth-dried patients. Manufacturer should be focused on that. There is a need for toothpastes without the necessity of rinsing because the elderly, especially mouth-dried patients, swallow it. It might be a matter of flavour because the slightest flavour is too strong for them.

Recent studies show that hypersensitivity can be reasonably well controlled by using toothpastes with a fluoride concentration of 1,500 ppm in long-term therapy, especially in the combination containing 8.0 % arginine [5]. Stannous fluoride creates a layer on the surface; aminefluoride precipitates for mineralizing solutions. In theory, potassium nitrate blocks the synapse between nerve cells, but no clear evidence is available for the support of potassium-containing toothpastes for dentine hypersensitivity [6]. By protein precipitation, glutaraldehyde leads to an occlusion of the dentinal tubules.

A single topical application of fluoride varnish reduces cervical hypersensitivity for up to 24 weeks [7]. Fluoride varnish has a momentarily effect on hypersensitivity, but it must be repeated after some months and works best in combination with fluoride mouthrinses [8]. Beside the fluoride effect, colophonium as an ingredient in varnishes can additionally plug dental tubules.

In case of hypersensitivity, the fluoride rinsing is recommended twice a day as Peterson stated. As fluoridated toothpaste primarily led to a higher degree of remineralisation of dentine caries lesions, the additional use of fluoridated dental rinse will enhance this effect [9]. The option of application of casein CPP-ACP has no long-lasting effect on dental hypersensitivities [10].

Clinical recommendation for patients with a risk of root caries, toothpaste with aminofluoride in a concentration of 1,500 ppm twice a day has the highest priority. It is effective and cost-effective [11].

The next step is the application of a dentin bonding agent. Problem is that the dentine sealing is not visible, only if a filling is placed [12]. Dentin adhesives are plugging the tubules while coating the dentin.

One important additional therapeutical effect is the placebo effect. Because in clinical studies we find a success rate in placebo groups up to 40 %, this is a big issue. With this, a dentist should be aware and influence his therapeutic strategy. So we can state that a big part of the needs to treat exposed dental necks are met.

Notes

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Addy M, Urquart E (1992) Dentine hypersensitivity: its prevalence, etiology and clinical management. Dent Updat 19:407–412Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kleinberg I, Kaufmann HW, Wolff M (1994) Measurement of tooth hypersensitivity and oral factors involved in its development. Arch Oral Biol 39(Suppl):63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Driscol WS, Nowjack-Raymer R, Selwitz RH, Li SH, Heifetz SB (1992) A comparison of the caries-preventive effects of fluoride mouthrinsing, fluoride tablets, and both procedures combined: final results after eight years. J Publ Health Dent 52:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Griffin SO, Regnier E, Griffin PM, Huntley V (2007) Effectiveness of fluoride in preventing caries in adults. J Dent Res 86(5):410–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Que K, Fu Y, Lin L, Hu D, Zhang YP, Panagakos FS, DeVizio W, Mateo LR (2010) Dentin hypersensitivity reduction of a new toothpaste containing 8.0% arginine and 1450 ppm fluoride: an 8-week clinical study on Chinese adults. Am J Dent 23(Spec No):28A–35APubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poulsen S, Errboe M, Lescay MY, Glenny A-M (2006) Potassium containing toothpastes for dentine hypersensitivity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3. Art. No.: doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001476.pub2.
  7. 7.
    Ritter AV, de Dias WL, Miguez P, Caplan DJ, Swift EJ Jr (2006) Treating cervical dentin hypersensitivity with fluoride varnish: a randomized clinical study. JADA 137:1013–1020PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marinho VCC, Higgins JPT, Sheiham A, Logan S (2009) Combinations of topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, varnishes) versus single topical fluoride for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Oral Health Group. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002781.pub2
  9. 9.
    Petersson LG, Kambara M (2004) Remineralisation study of artificial root caries lesions after fluoride treatment. An in vitro study using electric caries monitor and transversal micro-radiograph. Gerodont 21:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wegehaupt FJ, Tauböck TT, Stillhard A, Schmidlin PR, Attin T (2011) Influence of extra- and intra-oral application of CPP-ACP and fluoride on re-hardening of eroded enamel. Acta Odontol Scand 25:1–7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spliet C, Fleßa S (2008) Modelling lifelong costs of caries with and without fluoride use. Eur J Oral Sci 116(2):164–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmidlin PR, Göhring TN, Roos M, Zehnder M (2006) Wear resistance and surface roughness of a newly devised adhesive patch for sealing smooth enamel surfaces. Oper Dent 31(1):115–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Klin. Abteilung für Zahnerhaltung, Univ. Klinik für Zahn-, Mund- und KieferheilkundeMedizinische Universität GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations