Trends in World Dental Research: an overview of the last three decades using the Web of Science
- 513 Downloads
The objective of this paper is to analyse the scientific activity of dental sciences over the last 30 years.
Materials and methods
Dental-research output was identified by retrieving all citable dental documents in the Web of Science (WoS) database in the periods 1986–1988, 1996–1998, and 2006–2008. For this, a two-phase search strategy was designed: firstly, output in Dentistry, Oral Surgery, and Medicine (DOSM) Journal Citation Reports (JCR) category journals were compiled; secondly, for journal documents of other JCR categories but related to Dentistry (Non-DOSM), an innovative search strategy was designed based on a double criterion, thematic and institutional.
The results showed that DOSM production increased in absolute but decreased in relative terms over the last 30 years. The JCR categories where dental researchers publish also varied. Surprisingly, the geographic distribution of the production shows a growing concentration of the steadily fewer countries, a previously undescribed phenomenon, while the thematic analysis reveals that this production continued to form four broad thematic areas encompassing the remaining specialties: Dental Materials Prosthodontics, Orthodontics, and General Dentistry.
Scientific production in dentistry has changed in the past three decades both quantitatively and qualitatively, as well as their geographical distribution despite being structured around the same specialties.
In this study, along with some key messages about the key shifts in publication trends, in terms of subject, where published and by whom, we propose a new methodology which could be useful to professionals as well as researchers, in which the exhaustivity and precision rates for scientific information retrieval improve.
KeywordsDental research Dentistry Publications Journal impact factor Bibliometrics Biomedical research
We thank David Nesbitt for the English version of the text. This research was supported by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (Spain) grant MAT2009:09795.
Conflict of interest
The authors not have a financial relationship with the organization that sponsored the research. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Price DJS (1963) Little science, big science. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 11.American Dental Association (2012) ADA specialties. http://www.ada.org/495.aspx. Accessed January 2012
- 12.Batagelj V, Mrvar A (2003) Pajek. Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks. In: Jünger M, Mutzel P (eds) Graph drawing software. Springer, Berlin, pp 77–103Google Scholar
- 21.Pestaña A (1997) El MEDLINE como fuente de información bibliométrica de la producción española en Biomedicina y Ciencias Médicas. Comparación con el Science Citation Index. Med Clin 109:506–511Google Scholar
- 24.Lewison G (1996) The definition of biomedical research subfields with title keywords and application to the analysis of research outputs. Res Evaluat 6:25–36Google Scholar
- 27.Granda-Orive JI, García Rio F, Aleixandre Benavent R, Valderrama Zurian JC, Jiménez Ruiz CA, Solano Reina S, Villanueva Serrano S, Alonso Arroyo A (2007) Spanish productivity in smoking research relative to world and European Union productivity from 1999 through 2003, analyzed with the Science Citation Index. Arch Bronconeumol 43:212–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Archambault E (2010) 30 Years in science. Secular movements in knowledge creation. http://www.science-metrix.com/30years-Paper.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2012