Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 431–439 | Cite as

One-year results of vital pulp therapy in permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis: an ongoing multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial

  • Saeed AsgaryEmail author
  • Mohammad Jafar Eghbal
  • Jamileh Ghoddusi
  • Shahram Yazdani
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

Root canal therapy (RCT) and tooth extraction have been conventional treatment options for management of human mature teeth with irreversible pulpitis. Excellent short-term treatment outcomes of vital pulp therapy with calcium-enriched mixture cement (VPT/CEM), as a new treatment option, on postoperative pain relief was demonstrated; if intermediate- and long-term treatment outcomes of the new treatment are also non-inferior compared to RCT, then VPT/CEM may become a viable treatment option for management of mature teeth with irreversible pulpitis.

Materials and methods

In 23 healthcare centers, 407 9- to 65-year-old patients were randomly allocated into two study arms including one-visit RCT (reference treatment; n = 202) and VPT/CEM (alternative treatment; n = 205). Six- and twelve-month clinical and radiographic successes were assessed.

Results

Mean follow-up times at 6- and 12-month follow-ups were “6.70 ± 0.68 and 6.72 ± 0.71 months” and “12.96 ± 0.67 and 12.90 ± 0.66 months” in the available cases of RCT and VPT/CEM arms, respectively. Favorable clinical success rates in the two study arms did not show statistical difference; however, the radiographic success rate in the VPT/CEM was significantly greater than RCT arm at the two follow-ups (P < 0.001). The patients’ age had no effect on the treatment outcomes (P = 0.231).

Conclusions

Treatment outcomes of VPT/CEM may be superior to RCT in mature molars with irreversible pulpitis. The performance of biomaterials such CEM cement may assist in the shift towards more biologic treatments.

Clinical relevance

VPT/CEM may be a realistic alternative treatment for human mature molar teeth with symptoms of irreversible pulpitis; the use of VPT/CEM is highly beneficial for patients as well as general dentists.

Keywords

Biomaterial Calcium-enriched mixture CEM cement Endodontics Human Molar Pulpitis Pulpotomy Vital pulp therapy 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the study participants and dentists (Drs. S. Niknam, H. Abdolmaleki, M. Shahriari, B. Sepehri, M. Zarei, H. Mohadesi, L. Kochmeshki, N. Shirzaei, S.H. Hoseini, M.R. Naderi, A.R. Torkamanzadeh, N. Sahranavard, J. Mohebi, A. Naseri, M. Forozanfar, A. Razavi, A. Izadi, H. Fadaei, K. Khorshidian, H.A. Taheri, M.H. Bagheri-Atabak, M. Zareshahi, and M. Pahlevan-Shamsi) for their enthusiastic contributions; as well as Drs. K. Bagheri-lankarani, S.H. Emami-Razavi, S.M. Alavian, A.R. Mesdaghinia, M.M. Goya, M.H. Khoshnevisan, S.M. Tabatabaei, K Etemad, M.M. Vardi, M. Sourosh, and H. Hesary, who provided the national supervision of and support for this trial; Dr S.M.R. Safavi for critical review; Drs. A.R. Zali, S. Mohamad-Sadeghi, M.R. Razzaghi, M. Piriaei, and S. Kheirieh for administrative help; Drs. A. Akbarzadeh and M.J. Kharazi-Fard, who helped to develop the original statistical design/analysis; Drs. R.A. Taheri, F. Rahnama, A. Heravi, G.A. Dehghani, and H. Fotohi, who monitored the trial in different states; Dr. E. Soheilipour, M. Ghorbanpour, B. Shadman, O. Hosseini, and Z. Khademi, who entered and checked the data; Drs. H. Nazarinia and S. Goorang, who interpreted the x-rays; and Dr. L. Alim Marvasti for the English editing of the manuscript.

This work was supported by the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education (Health Deputy, Oral Health Office) and Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences [grant number p/25/17/1/tm/103].

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Kojima K, Inamoto K, Nagamatsu K, Hara A, Nakata K, Morita I, Nakagaki H, Nakamura H (2004) Success rate of endodontic treatment of teeth with vital and nonvital pulps. A meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97:95–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siqueira JF, Rôças IN, Riche FNSJ, Provenzano JC (2008) Clinical outcome of the endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis using an antimicrobial protocol. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:757–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asgary S, Shadman B, Ghalamkarpour Z, Shahravan A, Ghoddusi J, Bagherpour A, Akbarzadeh Baghban A, Hashemipour M, Ghasemian Pour M (2010) Periapical status and quality of root canal fillings and coronal restorations in Iranian population. Iranian Endodontic J 5:74–82Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldberg M, Schmalz G (2011) Toward a strategic plan for pulp healing: from repair to regeneration. Clin Oral Investig 1–2Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caplan DJ, Cai J, Yin G, White BA (2005) Root canal filled versus non-root canal filled teeth: a retrospective comparison of survival times. J Public Health Dent 65:90–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McDougal RA, Delano EO, Caplan D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M (2004) Success of an alternative for interim management of irreversible pulpitis. J Am Dent Assoc 135:1707–1712PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eghbal MJ, Asgary S, Baglue RA, Parirokh M, Ghoddusi J (2009) MTA pulpotomy of human permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis. Aust Endod J 35:4–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Asgary S, Ehsani S (2009) Permanent molar pulpotomy with a new endodontic cement: a case series. J Conserv Dent 12:31–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nosrat A, Asgary S (2010) Apexogenesis of a symptomatic molar with calcium enriched mixture. Int Endod J 43:940–944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Asgary S (2011) Calcium-enriched mixture pulpotomy of a human permanent molar with irreversible pulpitis and condensing apical periodontitis. J Conserv Dent 14:90–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Asgary S. Endodontic filling material, USA. 7,942,961, 2011 May 17Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Parirokh M (2008) Sealing ability of a novel endodontic cement as a root-end filling material. J Biomed Mater Res A 87:706–709PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Asgary S, Kamrani FA (2008) Antibacterial effects of five different root canal sealing materials. J Oral Sci 50:469–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Asgary S, Shahabi S, Jafarzadeh T, Amini S, Kheirieh S (2008) The properties of a new endodontic material. J Endod 34:990–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Parirokh M, Ghoddusi J (2009) Effect of two storage solutions on surface topography of two root-end fillings. Aust Endod J 35:147–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Parirokh M, Ghoddusi J, Kheirieh S, Brink F (2009) Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate’s composition with Portland cements and a new endodontic cement. J Endod 35:243–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Parirokh M, Ghanavati F, Rahimi H (2008) A comparative study of histologic response to different pulp capping materials and a novel endodontic cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:609–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parirokh M, Mirsoltani B, Raoof M, Tabrizchi H, Haghdoost AA (2011) Comparative study of subcutaneous tissue responses to a novel root-end filling material and white and grey mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 44:283–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Ehsani S (2010) Periradicular regeneration after endodontic surgery with calcium-enriched mixture cement in dogs. J Endod 36:837–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Samiee MEM, Parirokh M, Abbas FM, Asgary S (2009) Repair of furcal perforation using a new endodontic cement. Clin Oral Investig 14:653–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tabarsi B, Parirokh M, Eghbal M, Haghdoost A, Torabzadeh H, Asgary S (2010) A comparative study of dental pulp response to different pulpotomy agents. Int Endod J 43:565–571Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Asgary S, Eghbal MJ (2010) The effect of pulpotomy using a calcium-enriched mixture cement versus one-visit root canal therapy on postoperative pain relief in irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial. Odontology 98:126–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    LZ S (1965) The dependence of the results of pulp therapy on certain factors. Acta Odontol Scand 14 (suppl 21):Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dugas NN, Lawrence HP, Teplitsky P, Friedman S (2002) Quality of life and satisfaction outcomes of endodontic treatment. J Endod 28:819–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Friedman S, Mor C (2004) The success of endodontic therapy—healing and functionality. J Calif Dent Assoc 32:493–503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dugas NNLH, Teplitsky PE, Pharoah MJ, Friedman S (2003) Periapical health and treatment quality assessment of root-filled teeth in two Canadian populations. Int Endod J 36:181–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang Z, Pan J, Wright JT, Bencharit S, Zhang S, Everett ET, Teixeira FB, Preisser JS (2010) Putative stem cells in human dental pulp with irreversible pulpitis: an exploratory study. J Endod 36:820–825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aguilar P, Linsuwanont P (2011) Vital pulp therapy in vital permanent teeth with cariously exposed pulp: a systematic review. J Endod 37:581–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bogen G, Chandler N (2008) Vital pulp therapy. In: Ingle (ed) Ingle's endodontics, 6th edn. BC Decker INC, Lewiston, pp 1310–1329Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bjorndal L (2008) Indirect pulp therapy and stepwise excavation. Pediatr Dent 30:225–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Levin LG, Law AS, Holland GR, Abbott PV, Roda RS (2009) Identify and define all diagnostic terms for pulpal health and disease states. J Endod 35:1645–1657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Seltzer S, Bender IB, Ziontz M (1963) The dynamics of pulp inflammation: correlations between diagnostic data and actual histologic findings in the pulp. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 16:969–977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Matsuo T, Nakanishi T, Shimizu H, Ebisu S (1996) A clinical study of direct pulp capping applied to carious-exposed pulps. J Endod 22:551–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Caliskan MK (1995) Pulpotomy of carious vital teeth with periapical involvement. Int Endod J 28:172–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ (2006) Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA 295:1152–1160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bohay RN (2000) The sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of radiographic periapical diagnosis of posterior teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:639–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dammaschke T, Leidinger J, Schafer E (2010) Long-term evaluation of direct pulp capping—treatment outcomes over an average period of 6.1 years. Clin Oral Investig 14:559–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Orstavik D (1996) Time-course and risk analyses of the development and healing of chronic apical periodontitis in man. Int Endod J 29:150–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fristad I, Molven O, Halse A (2004) Nonsurgically retreated root filled teeth—radiographic findings after 20–27 years. Int Endod J 37:12–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Salehrabi R, Rotstein I (2004) Endodontic treatment outcomes in a large patient population in the USA: an epidemiological study. J Endod 30:846–850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bjørndal L, Laustsen M, Reit C (2006) Root canal treatment in Denmark is most often carried out in carious vital molar teeth and retreatments are rare. Int Endod J 39:785–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Asgary S, Eghbal M (2012) Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy in permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis using biomaterials: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Acta Odontol Scand. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.654251
  44. 44.
    Alongi DJ, Yamaza T, Song Y, Fouad AF, Romberg EE, Shi S, Tuan RS, Huang GT (2010) Stem/progenitor cells from inflamed human dental pulp retain tissue regeneration potential. Regen Med 5:617–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ranly DM, Garcia-Godoy F (2000) Current and potential pulp therapies for primary and young permanent teeth. J Dent 28:153–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Massler M (1978) Preserving the exposed pulp: a review. J Pedod 2:217–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nosrat A, Seifi A, Asgary S (2011) Regenerative endodontic treatment (revascularization) for necrotic immature permanent molars: a review and report of two cases with a new biomaterial. J Endod 37:562–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Malekafzali B, Shekarchi F, Asgary S (2011) Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy in primary molars using two endodontic biomaterials. A 2-year randomised clinical trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent 12:189–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nosrat A, Seifi A, Asgary S (2012) Pulpotomy in caries-exposed immature permanent molars using calcium-enriched mixture cement or mineral trioxide aggregate: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2012.01224.x
  50. 50.
    Asgary S (2010) Furcal perforation repair using calcium enriched mixture cement. J Conserv Dent 13:156–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zarrabi MH, Javidi M, Jafarian AH, Joushan B (2010) Histologic assessment of human pulp response to capping with mineral trioxide aggregate and a novel endodontic cement. J Endod 36:1778–1781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nosrat A, Asgary S (2010) Apexogenesis treatment with a new endodontic cement: a case report. J Endod 36:912–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Asgary SNA, Seifi A (2011) Management of inflammatory external root resorption using calcium-enriched mixture cement. J Endod 37:411–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hasan Zarrabi M, Javidi M, Naderinasab M, Gharechahi M (2009) Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial activity of three cements: new endodontic cement (NEC), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Portland. J Oral Sci 51:437–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ward J (2002) Vital pulp therapy in cariously exposed permanent teeth and its limitations. Aust Endod J 28:29–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mente J, Geletneky B, Ohle M, Koch MJ, Friedrich Ding PG, Wolff D, Dreyhaupt J, Martin N, Staehle HJ, Pfefferle T (2010) Mineral trioxide aggregate or calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping: an analysis of the clinical treatment outcome. J Endod 36:806–813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Geurtsen W (2001) Biocompatibility of root canal filling materials. Aust Endod J 27:12–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schmalz G (2009) Determination of biocompatibility. In: Schmalz G, Arenholt-Bindslev D (eds) Biocompatibility of dental materials. Springer, Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp 13–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saeed Asgary
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohammad Jafar Eghbal
    • 2
  • Jamileh Ghoddusi
    • 3
  • Shahram Yazdani
    • 4
  1. 1.Iranian Center for Endodontic ResearchShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Dental Research CenterShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  3. 3.Endodontic Department, Dental SchoolMashad University of Medical SciencesMashadIran
  4. 4.Educational Development Center (EDC)Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations