Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 649–656 | Cite as

Sex differences in dental caries experience: clinical evidence, complex etiology

Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

A sex difference in oral health has been widely documented through time and across cultures. Women's oral health declines more rapidly than men's with the onset of agriculture and the associated rise in fertility. The magnitude of this disparity in oral health by sex increases during ontogeny: from childhood, to adolescence, and through the reproductive years. Representative studies of sex differences in caries, tooth loss, and periodontal disease are critically reviewed. Surveys conducted in Hungary, India, and in an isolated traditional Brazilian sample provide additional support for a significant sex bias in dental caries, especially in mature adults. Compounding hormonal and reproductive factors, the sex difference in oral health in India appears to involve social and religious causes such as son preference, ritual fasting, and dietary restrictions during pregnancy. Like the sex difference in caries, tooth loss in women is greater than in men and has been linked to caries and parity. Results of genome wide association studies have found caries susceptible and caries protective loci that influence variation in taste, saliva, and enamel proteins, affecting the oral environment and the micro-structure of enamel. Genetic variation, some of which is X-linked, may partly explain how sex differences in oral health originate. A primary, but neglected, factor in explaining the sex differential in oral health is the complex and synergistic changes associated with female sex hormones, pregnancy, and women's reproductive life history. Caries etiology is complex and impacts understanding of the sex difference in oral health. Both biological (genetics, hormones, and reproductive history) and anthropological (behavioral) factors such culture-based division of labor and gender-based dietary preferences play a role.

Keywords

Gender Caries experience Pregnancy Reproduction Sex hormones Genome-wide scans 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Sections of this review were presented at professional meetings of the Australasian Society for Human Biology (Auckland, NZ; December 2003), the Canadian Association of Physical Anthropologists (Edmonton, Canada; October 2003), the 16th meeting of the European Paleopathology Association (Santorini, Greece; August 2006), the American Association of Physical Anthropologists (Philadelphia, PA; April 2007), and the 14th International Symposium on Dental Morphology (Griefswald, Germany; August 2008). Thanks to Prof. Dr. Kurt W. Alt for inviting me to contribute an article on sex differences in dental caries to this special issue of Clinical Oral Investigations.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Haugejorden O (1996) Using the DMF gender difference to assess the 'major' role of fluoride toothpastes in the caries decline in industrialized countries: a meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 24:369–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Institute of Medicine (US) (2001) Committee on understanding the biology of sex and gender differences, Exploring the biological contributions to human health: Does Sex Matter? National Academy Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boggess KA (2008) Maternal oral health in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 111:976–986Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gajendra S, Kumar JV (2004) Oral health and pregnancy: a review. NY State Dent J 70:40–44Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Russell SL, Mayberry LJ (2008) Pregnancy and oral health: a review and recommendations to reduce gaps in practice and research. MCN, Am J Matern Child Nursing 33:32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Silk H, Douglass AB, Douglass JM, Silk L (2008) Oral health during pregnancy. Am Fam Physician 77:1139–1144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Acharya S, Bhat PV, Acharya S (2009) Factors affecting oral health-related quality of life among pregnant women. Int J Dent Hygiene 7:102–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Covington P (1996) Women's oral health issues: an exploration of the literature. Probe 30:173–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    National Institutes of Health (2006) Study finds periodontal treatment does not lower pre-term birth risk. (http//www.nih.gov/news/pr/nov2006/nidcr-01.htm)
  10. 10.
    Klatsky M, Fischer RL (1953) The human masticatory apparatus: an introduction to dental anthropology. Dental Items of Interest Publ Co, BrooklynGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Larsen CS (1983) Behavioral implications of temporal change in cariogenesis. J Archaeol Sci 10:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cohen MN, Armelagos GJ (1984) Paleopathology at the origins of agriculture, ed. Academic, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lukacs JR (1992) Dental paleopathology and agricultural intensification in South Asia: new evidence from Bronze Age Harappa. Am J Phys Anthropol 87(1):133–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tayles N, Domett K, Halcrow S (2009) Can dental caries be interpreted as evidence of farming? The Asian experience. In: Koppe T, Meyer G, Alt KW (eds) Comparative Dental Morphology. Karger, Basel, pp 162–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lukacs JR (2007) Climate, subsistence and health in prehistoric India: the biological impact of a short term subsistence shift. In: Cohen MN, Crane-Kramer GMM (eds) Ancient Health: Skeletal Indicators of Agricultural and Economic Intensification. University Press of Florida, Gainsville, pp 237–249Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Larsen CS (1998) Gender, health and activity in foragers and farmers in the American southeast: implications for social organization in the Georgia Bight. In: Grauer AL, Stuart-Macadam P (eds) Sex and gender in paleopathological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 165–187Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walker P, Erlandson J (1986) Dental evidence for prehistoric dietary change on the northern Channel Islands, California. Am Antiquity 51:375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lukacs JR (1996) Sex differences in dental caries rates with the origin of agriculture in South Asia. Curr Anthropol 37:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lukacs JR, Pal JN (1993) Mesolithic subsistence in north India: inferences from dental attributes. Curr Anthropol 34(5):745–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lukacs JR (1990) On hunter-gatherers and their neighbors in prehistoric India: context and pathology. Curr Anthropol 31(2):183–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lukacs JR, Largaespada LL (2006) Explaining sex differences in dental caries prevalence: saliva, hormones and 'life history' etiologies. Am J Hum Biol 18:540–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lukacs JR, Thompson LM (2007) Dental caries prevalence by sex in prehistory: magnitude and meaning. In: Irish J, Nelson G (eds) Technique and application in dental anthropology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 136–177Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lukacs JR (2008) Fertility and agriculture accentuate sex differences in dental caries rates. Curr Anthropol 49:901–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brothwell D (1981) Digging up bones, 3 rdth edn. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH (1994) STANDARDS for data collection from human skeletal remains. Arkansas Archaeol Surv, FayettevilleGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hillson S (2001) Recording dental caries in archaeological human remains. Internat J Osteoarchaeol 11:249–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lukacs JR (1989) Dental paleopathology: methods for reconstructing dietary patterns. In: Yasar Iscan M, Kennedy KAR (eds) Reconstruction of life from the skeleton. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, pp 261–286Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wesolowski V (2006) Caries prevalence in skeletal series—is it possible to compare? Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 101(II):139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Madléna M, Hermann P, Jáhn M, Fejérdy P (2008) Caries prevalence and tooth loss in Hungarian adult population: results of a national survey. BMC Public Health 8:364, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/8/364 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mangi SL (1954) The effect of pregnancy on the incidence of dental caries in Indian women. J All India Dent Assoc 26:1–4Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Arantes R, Santos RV, Frazao P, Coimbra CEA (2009) Caries, gender and socio-economic change in the Xavante Indians from central Brazil. Ann Hum Biol 36:162–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    World Health Organization (1997) Oral health surveys: basic methods, 4th edn. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lukacs JR (2010) The gender gap in oral health in India: A meta-analysis and review of contributing factors. Anthropol Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Miller BD (1981) The endangered sex: neglect of female children in rural North India. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pearson AM (1996) "Because it gives me peace of mind": Ritual fasts in the religious lives of hindu women. State University of New York, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vallianatos H (2006) Poor and pregnant in New Delhi, India. Qual Institute Press, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Alvarez JO (1995) Nutrition, tooth development and dental caries. Am J Clin Nutr 61:410–416Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Psoter WJ, Reid BC, Katz RV (2005) Malnutrition and dental caries: a review of the literature. Caries Res 39:441–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Johansson I, Ericson T, Steen L (1984) Studies of the effect of diet on saliva secretion and caries development—the effect of fasting on saliva composition of female subjects. J Nutr 114:2010–2020PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Psoter WJ, Spielman AL, Gebrian B, St Jean R, Katz Ralph V (2008) Effect of childhood malnutrition on salivary flow and pH. Arch Oral Biol 53:231–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cucina A, Tiesler V (2003) Dental caries and antemortem tooth loss in the Northern Peten area, Mexico: a biocultural perspective on status differences among the classic Maya. Am J Phys Anthropol 122:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nelson GC, Lukacs JR, Yule P (1999) Dates, caries, and early tooth loss during the Iron Age of Oman. Am J Phys Anthropol 108:333–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Oyamada J, Igawa K, Kitagawa Y, Manabe Y, Kato K, Matsushita T, Rokutanda A (2007) Low AMTL ratios in Medieval Japanese dentition excavated from the Yuigahama–Minami site in Kamakura. Anthropol Sci 115:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Watson JT, Fields M, Martin DL (2010) Introduction of agriculture and its effects on women's oral health. Am J Hum Biol 22:92–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Keenleyside A (2008) Dental pathology and diet at Apollonia, a Greek colony on the black sea. Internat J Osteoarchaeol 18:262–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Corraini P, Baelum V, Pannuti CM, Pustiglioni AN, Romito GA, Pustiglioni FE (2009) Tooth loss prevalence and risk indicators in an isolated population of Brazil. Acta Odontol Scand 67:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    López R, Baelum V (2006) Gender differences in tooth loss among Chilean adolescents: Socio-economic and behavioral correlates. Acta Odontol Scand 64:169–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Shigli K, Hebbal M, Angadi GS (2009) Relative contribution of caries and periodontal disease in adult tooth loss among patients reporting to the Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum, India. Gerodontol 26:218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Al Shammery A, El Backly M, Guile EE (1998) Permanent tooth loss among adults and children in Saudi Arabia. Community Dent Health 15:277–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Meisel P, Reifenberger J, Haase R, Nauck M, Brant C, Kocher T (2008) Women are periodontally healthier than men, but why don't they have more teeth than men? Menopause: J North Am Menopause Soc 15:270–275Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Russell SL, Ickovics JR, Yaffee RA (2008) Exploring potential pathways between parity and tooth loss among American women. Am J Public Health 98:1263–1270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Christensen K, Gaist D, Jeune B, Vaupel JW (1998) A tooth per child? Lancet 352:204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Miller G (2009) The looming crisis in human genetics. The Economist: The World in 2010. pp. 151–152Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vieira AR, Marazita ML, Goldstein-McHenry T (2008) Genome-wide scan finds suggestive caries loci. J Dent Res 87:915–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Deeley K, Letra A, Rose EK, Brandon CA, Resick JM, Marazita ML, Vieira AR (2008) Possible association of amelogenin to high caries experience in a Guatemalan–Mayan population. Caries Res 42:8–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Patir A, Seymen F, Yildirim M, Deeley K, Cooper ME, Marazita ML, Vieira AR (2008) Enamel formation genes are associated with high caries experience in Turkish children. Caries Res 42:394–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Russell RRB (2008) How has genomics altered our view of caries microbiology? Caries Res 42:319–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nasidze I, Li J, Quinque D, Tang K, Stoneking M (2009) Global diversity in the human salivary microbiome. Genome Res 19:636–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Marsh PD (2004) Dental plaque as a microbial biofilm. Caries Res 38:204–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kolenbrander PE, Palmer RJ Jr (2004) Human oral bacterial biofilms. In: Ghannoum M, O'Toole GA (eds) Microbial biofilms. ASM Press, Washington, pp 85–117Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Armelagos GJ (1998) Introduction: sex, gender and health status in prehistoric and contemporary populations. In: Grauer AL, Stuart-Macadam P (eds) Sex and gender in paleopathological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Walker PL, Cook DC (1998) Brief communication: gender and sex: vive la difference. Am J Phys Anthropol 106:255–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations