Effect of two X-ray tube voltages on detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs. An in vitro study
- 142 Downloads
This study evaluated the effect of two different tube voltages on clinicians’ ability to diagnose approximal carious lesions in digital radiographs. One hundred extracted teeth were radiographed twice at two voltage settings, 60 and 70 kV, using a standardized procedure. Seven observers evaluated the radiographs on a standard color monitor pre-calibrated according to DICOM part 14. Evaluations were made at ambient light levels below 50 lx. All observations were analyzed with receiver operating characteristic curves. A histological examination of the teeth served as the criterion standard. A paired t test compared the effects of the two voltages. The significance level was set to p < 0.05. Weighted kappa statistics estimated intra-observer agreement. No significant difference in accuracy of approximal carious lesion diagnosis was found between the two voltage settings. But five observers rated dentin lesions on radiographs exposed at 70 kV better than on radiographs exposed at 60 kV. Intra-observer agreement differed from fair to moderate. There was no significant difference in accuracy of approximal carious lesion diagnosis between digital radiographs exposed with 60 or 70 kV.
KeywordsDisplay monitor Digital radiography Dental caries ROC curve Kilo voltage
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
- 6.Hellén-Halme K, Nilsson M, Petersson A (2009) Effect of monitors on approximal caries detection in digital radiographs-standard versus precalibrated DICOM part 14 displays: An in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol EndodGoogle Scholar
- 7.Kullendorff B, Nilsson M, Rohlin M (1996) Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 82:344–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), Task Group 18 Assessment of Display Performance for Medical Imaging Systems. http://deckard.mc.duke.edu/∼samei/tg18. 2008-09-20
- 10.Berkhout WER (2007) Implementation of digital dental radiography. User aspects, radiation dose and diagnostic effects. Thesis. Academic Centre for Dentistry in Amsterdam, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- 13.Swedish Radiation Safety Authority. http://www.stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se/In-English/About-the-Swedish-Radiation-Safety-Authority1 2009-02-25
- 16.Barten PGJ (1999) Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its effects on image quality. Knegsel: HV Press. Proefschrift Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 1999. ISBN 90-90112613-9. NUGI 832Google Scholar
- 17.DICOM, Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine. http://medical.nema.org 2007-02-08. DICOM part 14: Grayscale Standard Display Function.
- 21.Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 29.WHO Oral Health Country/Area. WHO Collaborating Centre, Malmö University, Sweden. http://www.whocollab.od.mah.se/euro/sweden/sweden.html 2008-06-12.
- 30.Swets JA, Pickett RM (1982) Evaluation of diagnostic systems: methods from signal detection theory. Academic, New York, pp 60–80Google Scholar