Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 607–611 | Cite as

Retention force measurement of telescopic crowns

  • Stefan BayerEmail author
  • Helmut Stark
  • Sebastian Mues
  • Ludger Keilig
  • Anja Schrader
  • Norbert Enkling
Original Article

Abstract

This study deals with the determination of the retentive force between primary and secondary telescopic crowns under clinical conditions. Forty-three combined fixed–removable prostheses with a total of 140 double crowns were used for retention force measurement of the telescopic crowns prior to cementation. The crowns had a preparation of 1–2°. A specifically designed measuring device was used. The retentive forces were measured with and without lubrication by a saliva substitute. The measured values were analyzed according to the type of tooth (incisors, canines, premolars, and molars). Additionally, a comparison between lubricated and unlubricated telescopic crowns was done. As maximum retention force value 29.98 N was recorded with a telescopic crown on a molar, while the minimum of 0.08 N was found with a specimen on a canine. The median value of retention force of all telescopic crowns reached 1.93 N with an interquartile distance of 4.35 N. No statistically significant difference between lubricated and unlubricated specimens was found. The results indicate that retention force values of telescopic crowns, measured in clinical practice, are often much lower than those cited in the literature. The measurements also show a wide range. Whether this proves to be a problem for the patient’s quality of life or not can however only be established by a comparison of the presented results with a follow-up study involving measurement of intraoral retention and determination by e.g. oral health impact profile.

Keywords

Retention force Withdrawal force Telescopic crown Double crown Denture Friction 

References

  1. 1.
    Behr M, Hofmann E, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G (2000) Technical failure rates of double crown-retained removable partial dentures. Clinical oral investigations 4:87–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wostmann B, Balkenhol M, Weber A, Ferger P, Rehmann P (2007) Long-term analysis of telescopic crown retained removable partial dentures: survival and need for maintenance. J dent 35:939–945CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stark H, Schrenker H (1998) Performance of telescopic crwon retained dentures—a clinical long-term study (Bewährung teleskopverankerter Prothesen—eine klinische Langzeitstudie). Dtsch zahnarztl Z 3:183–186Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stark H (ed) (1996) Clinical and material research of experiences and wear behavior of telescopic retained dentures (Klinische und werkstoffkundliche Untersuchungen zur Bewährung von Teleskopprothesen und zum Verschleißverhalten von Teleskopkronen). Hänsel-Hohenhausen, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Igarashi Y, Goto T (1997) Ten-year follow-up study of conical crown-retained dentures. Int J Prosthodont 10:149–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beschnidt SM, Chitmongkolsuk S, Prull R (2001) Telescopic crown-retained removable partial dentures: review and case report. Compend Contin Educ Dent 22:927–928PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bergman B, Ericson A, Molin M (1996) Long-term clinical results after treatment with conical crown-retained dentures. Int J Prosthodont 9:533–538PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grossmann AC, Hassel AJ, Schilling O, Lehmann F, Koob A, Rammelsberg P (2007) Treatment with double crown-retained removable partial dentures and oral health-related quality of life in middle- and high-aged patients. Int J Prosthodont 20:576–578PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wostmann B, Balkenhol M, Kothe A, Ferger P (2008) Dental impact on daily living of telescopic crown-retained partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 21:419–421PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mock F, Schrenker H, Stark HK (2005) Success of telescopic crowns—a prospective long-term study (Eine klinische Langzeitstudie zur Bewährung von Teleskopprothesen). Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 3:148–153Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hagner MW, Grüner M, Bayer S, Keilig L, Reimann S, Bourauel C, Utz KH, Stark H (2006) Wear analysis of telescopic crowns—an in vitro study (Eine In-vitro-Studie zum Verschleiß von Teleskopkronen). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 11:594–603Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Becker H (1983) Retention mechanism of telescopic crowns (Das Haftverhalten teleskopierender Kronen). Zahnarztl Prax 34:281–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Korber KH (1983) Conical crowns—a rational telescopic system (Konuskronen–Das rationelle Teleskopsystem). Hülting, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Botega DM, Mesquita MF, Henriques GE, Vaz LG (2004) Retention force and fatigue strength of overdenture attachment systems. J Oral Rehabil 31:884–889CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lehmann KM, Armin, F v. Studies on the retention capability of push-button attachments (Untersuchungen über die Retentionskräfe von Druckknopfankern). Schweiz Mschr Zanheilk 1976:521–530Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    DIN 50320 (1979) Wear: terms, system analysis of wear, structure of wear processes. (Verschleiß. Begriffe, Systemanalyse von Verschleißvorgängen, Gliederung des Verschleißgebietes). Beuth, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stuttgen U (1985) Effect of saliva smears in experimental wear studies on precious and non-precious metal casting alloys (Zum Einfluss der Speichelschmierung auf experimentelle Verschleissuntersuchungen an EM- und NEM-Gusslegierungen). Zahntechnik 43:466–468, 470–461Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stuttgen U (1983) Experimental study of the parallelism of milled telescoping primary anchors (Experimentelle Untersuchung zur Parallelität gefräster teleskopierender Primäranker). Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 38:538–540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Minagi S, Natsuaki N, Nishigawa G, Sato T (1999) New telescopic crown design for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 81:684–688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gungor MA, Artunc C, Sonugelen M (2004) Parameters affecting retentive force of conus crowns. J Oral Rehabil 31:271–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stancic I, Jelenkovic A (2008) Retention of telescopic denture in elderly patients with maximum partially edentulous arch. Gerodontology 25:162–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Bayer
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Helmut Stark
    • 1
  • Sebastian Mues
    • 1
  • Ludger Keilig
    • 2
  • Anja Schrader
    • 1
  • Norbert Enkling
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Materials ScienceUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Oral TechnologyUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  3. 3.Clinic for Prosthetic DentistryUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations