The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: a 3D finite element analysis
- 1.4k Downloads
The biomechanical behavior of implant thread plays an important role on stresses at implant-bone interface. Information about the effect of different thread profiles upon the bone stresses is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different implant thread designs on stress distribution characteristics at supporting structures. In this study, three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) stress-analysis method was used. Four types of 3D mathematical models simulating four different thread-form configurations for a solid screw implant was prepared with supporting bone structure. V-thread (1), buttress (2), reverse buttress (3), and square thread designs were simulated. A 100-N static axial occlusal load was applied to occlusal surface of abutment to calculate the stress distributions. Solidworks/Cosmosworks structural analysis programs were used for FE modeling/analysis. The analysis of the von Mises stress values revealed that maximum stress concentrations were located at loading areas of implant abutments and cervical cortical bone regions for all models. Stress concentration at cortical bone (18.3 MPa) was higher than spongious bone (13.3 MPa), and concentration of first thread (18 MPa) was higher than other threads (13.3 MPa). It was seen that, while the von Mises stress distribution patterns at different implant thread models were similar, the concentration of compressive stresses were different. The present study showed that the use of different thread form designs did not affect the von Mises concentration at supporting bone structure. However, the compressive stress concentrations differ by various thread profiles.
KeywordsImplant thread form design Dental implants Biomechanics Finite element analysis Stress distribution
Conflict of interest
This study is funded by the Research Projects Counsil of the University of Selcuk. The authors declare that they have no financial, professional, or other personal interest that could influence the position presented in the paper.
- 1.Beer FP, DeWolf JT, Johnston ER (2005) Mechanics of materials, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill International, Singapore, pp 360–378Google Scholar
- 7.Geng JP, Ma XX (1995) A differential mathematical model to evaluate side-surface of an Archimede implant. Shanghai Shengwu Gongcheng Yixue 50:19Google Scholar
- 12.Misch CE (2005) Dental implant prosthetics. Mosby, St Louis, pp 322–347Google Scholar
- 17.Singley JE, Mischke CR (1989) Mechanical engineering design, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 123–157Google Scholar
- 18.Timoshenko S, Young DH (1968) Elements of strength of materials, 5th edn. Wadsworth, Florence, p 377Google Scholar
- 19.Ugural AC, Fenster SK (2003) Advanced strength and applied elasticity, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, New York, pp 155–157Google Scholar